Wastewater treatment of a vegetable oil factory by a hybrid ultrafiltration-activated carbon process

Abstract In this paper, experimental investigation of wastewater treatment by ultrafiltration (UF) is introduced. In the experiments, a UF membrane (UFPHT20-6338) and samples of Behshahr Ind. Co. wastewater as feed were used. Effect of operating conditions such as pressure difference, cross flow velocity, shear stress, temperature, concentration of organic compounds and pH on permeation flux, flux decline and fouling resistance were studied. Results show that a pressure difference more than 3 × 105 Pa (3 bar), a high cross flow velocity (depending on economic considerations), a temperature of 30 °C and a pH of 9 are the best operating conditions. Fouling of the membrane completely follows Hermia's model (cake filtration mechanism). Analysis of the wastewater treated by UF represents 91, 87, 100, 85 and 40% reduction in COD, TOC, TSS, [PO43−] and [Cl−], respectively. Also, treatment of the wastewater by UF-powdered activated carbon (PAC) was studied. According to results, using PAC in feed circulation loop of UF system with a concentration of about 0.1% (W) not only improves water quality but also increases permeation flux. A shear stress induced by PAC on the membrane surface decreases cake layer thickness and as a result increases permeation flux. Analysis of the wastewater treated by UF-PAC represents 94, 93, 100, 99 and 43% reduction in COD, TOC, TSS, [PO4−3] and [Cl−], respectively. Reduction of the phosphate concentration by UF-PAC is very considerable. A comparison between the results shows that UF is better than conventional biological method and UF-PAC is better than UF.

[1]  S. Elmaleh,et al.  Cross-flow ultrafiltration of hydrocarbon and biological solid mixed suspensions , 1996 .

[2]  Robert W. Field,et al.  Process factors during removal of oil-in-water emulsions with cross-flow microfiltration , 1996 .

[3]  P. Wang.  A pilot study of the treatment of waste rolling emulsion using zirconia microfiltration membranes , 2000 .

[4]  L. Nicolet,et al.  Recirculation of powdered activated carbon for the adsorption of dyes in municipal wastewater treatment plants , 1999 .

[5]  T. Mohammadi,et al.  Wastewater treatment using ultrafiltration at a vegetable oil factory , 2004 .

[6]  O. Mori,et al.  Effects of pore size on separation mechanisms of microfiltration of oily water, using porous glass tubular membrane , 1998 .

[7]  Vernon L. Snoeyink,et al.  Predicting and Verifying Organics Removal by PAC in an , 1991 .

[8]  P. Cote,et al.  Immersed membrane filtration for the production of drinking water: combination with PAC for NOM and SOCs removal , 1998 .

[9]  Shinichiro Ohgaki,et al.  Biological powdered activated carbon (BPAC) microfiltration for wastewater reclamation and reuse , 1996 .

[10]  Jörg E. Drewes,et al.  Removal of organic halogens (AOX) from municipal wastewater by powdered activated carbon (PAC) / activated sludge (AS) treatment , 1997 .

[11]  M. Hlavacek.  Break-up of oil-in-water emulsions induced by permeation through a microfiltration membrane , 1995 .

[12]  B. Jönsson,et al.  Influence of pH on the adsorptive fouling of ultrafiltration membranes by fatty acid , 2000 .

[13]  R. Machado,et al.  Separation of nutmeg essential oil and dense CO2 with a cellulose acetate reverse osmosis membrane , 2001 .

[14]  K. Scott,et al.  Intensified membrane filtration with corrugated membranes , 2000 .

[15]  R. Aim,et al.  Coagulation—adsorption—ultrafiltration for wastewater treatment and reuse☆ , 2000 .

[16]  Dezhi Sun,et al.  Demulsification of water-in-oil emulsion by using porous glass membrane , 1998 .

[17]  Hongde Zhou,et al.  Advanced technologies in water and wastewater treatment , 2001 .

[18]  M. Clark,et al.  Using PAC–UF to treat a low‐quality surface water , 1998 .