Seagrass ecology at the turn of the millennium: challenges for the new century

Abstract A review of the literature on seagrass ecology produced over the past decade (1989–1997) showed a sustained increase in the scientific production in international journals, with a doubling of the annual publication rate every four years. This production is highly concentrated in Aquatic Botany and three other journals (>50% of papers), involving contributors from 33 countries. Research efforts are growing rapidly in W. Europe, the Mediterranean Sea, the Caribbean Sea, and Australia. Studies on seagrass ecology also increase in NW America and SE Asia. Development of research is particularly strong in themes such as disturbance of seagrass meadows, and their growth, biogeochemistry and population dynamics. Yet, seagrass ecology is a rather imbalanced science, with half of the production produced by scientists from only two countries, examining only 10% of the seagrass flora from two biogeographic areas. Seagrass ecology is dominated by descriptive research (>60% of papers), with a paucity of efforts to synthesize results and derive general relationships. These characteristics result in a present lack of predictive ability, and scientific basis for the management of seagrass ecosystems. Coordination of research efforts in seagrass ecology has been limited, such that great uncertainty arises when scaling up the knowledge produced locally to assess seagrass resources at regional and global scales. Seagrass ecology must progress from the present descriptive stage to synthesis, either through large-scale comparative analyses or the formulation of general models, yielding the power to predict the time course of seagrass decline and recovery and the role of seagrass meadows in the ecosystem. The development of a cooperative framework should contribute to expanding the scale of the research, develop the capacity to conduct new relevant research, establish a global network monitoring seagrass resources, and incorporate seagrass ecosystems into international programs examining the health and functioning of the oceans.

[1]  H. Bach A dynamic model describing the seasonal variations in growth and the distribution of eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) I. Model theory , 1993 .

[2]  W. Dennison,et al.  Light intensity and the interactions between physiology, morphology and stable isotope ratios in five species of seagrass , 1996 .

[3]  P. Nørnberg,et al.  Coastal and near-shore changes correlated with die-back in eel-grass (Zostera Marina, L.) , 1981 .

[4]  Carlos M. Duarte,et al.  The fate of marine autotrophic production , 1996 .

[5]  Núria Marbà,et al.  The capacity of seagrasses to survive increased turbidity and siltation: The significance of growth form and light use , 1997 .

[6]  R. M. Bond Ecology of a Swamp in the American Tropics , 1933, Nature.

[7]  Carlos M. Duarte,et al.  Submerged aquatic vegetation in relation to different nutrient regimes , 1995 .

[8]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[9]  C. Duarte Allometric scaling of seagrass form and productivity , 1991 .

[10]  D. P. Wilson The Decline of Zostera Marina L. at Salcombe and its Effects on the Shore , 1949, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[11]  C. Hartog “Wasting disease” and other dynamic phenomena in Zostera beds , 1987 .

[12]  M. Mateo,et al.  Stable carbon isotopes in seagrasses: variability in ratios and use in ecological studies , 1996 .

[13]  C. Duarte Seagrass nutrient content , 1990 .

[14]  C. Duarte,et al.  Are seagrass growth and survival constrained by the reducing conditions of the sediment , 1999 .

[15]  P. Fong,et al.  Modeling seagrass communities in tropical and subtropical bays and estuaries: a mathematical model synthesis of current hypotheses , 1994 .

[16]  Robert J. Orth,et al.  Assessing Water Quality with Submersed Aquatic Vegetation , 1993 .

[17]  W. Kemp,et al.  Ecosystem model of an estuarine submersed plant community: Calibration and simulation of eutrophication responses , 1996 .

[18]  M. Hemminga The root/rhizome system of seagrasses: an asset and a burden , 1998 .

[19]  C. Duarte,et al.  Changes in community structure and biomass of seagrass communities along gradients of siltation in SE Asia , 1998 .

[20]  Frederick T. Short,et al.  Natural and human-induced disturbance of seagrasses , 1996, Environmental Conservation.

[21]  A. Ives,et al.  Bottle or big-scale studies: how do we do ecology? , 1996 .

[22]  Carlos M. Duarte,et al.  Seagrass Biomass And Production: A Reassessment , 1999 .

[23]  C. Duarte,et al.  Dynamics of a landscape mosaic: size and age distributions, growth and demography of seagrass Cymodocea nodosa patches , 1997 .

[24]  Michelle Waycott,et al.  Phylogenetic Studies in Alismatidae, II: Evolution of Marine Angiosperms (Seagrasses) and Hydrophily , 1997 .

[25]  P. Erftemeijer,et al.  Mass-Balance Constraints on Nutrient Cycling in Tropical Seagrass Beds , 1995 .

[26]  C. Duarte Seagrass depth limits , 1991 .

[27]  N. Marbà,et al.  Rhizome elongation and seagrass clonal growth , 1998 .

[28]  C. Duarte,et al.  Rates of changes in organic matter and nutrient stocks during seagrass Cymodosea nodosa colonization and stand development , 1997 .

[29]  J. Downing Comparing Apples with Oranges: Methods of Interecosystem Comparison , 1991 .

[30]  A. Cotton Disappearance of Zostera marina , 1933, Nature.