Integrating multiple technologies to understand the foraging behaviour of Hawaiian monk seals

The objective of this research was to investigate and describe the foraging behaviour of monk seals in the main Hawaiian Islands. Specifically, our goal was to identify a metric to classify foraging behaviour from telemetry instruments. We deployed accelerometers, seal-mounted cameras and GPS tags on six monk seals during 2012–2014 on the islands of Molokai, Kauai and Oahu. We used pitch, calculated from the accelerometer, to identify search events and thus classify foraging dives. A search event and consequent ‘foraging dive’ occurred when the pitch was greater than or equal to 70° at a depth less than or equal to −3 m. By integrating data from the accelerometers with video and GPS, we were able to ground-truth this classification method and identify environmental variables associated with each foraging dive. We used Bayesian logistic regression to identify the variables that influenced search events. Dive depth, body motion (mean overall dynamic body acceleration during the dive) and proximity to the sea floor were the best predictors of search events for these seals. Search events typically occurred on long, deep dives, with more time spent at the bottom (more than 50% bottom time). We can now identify where monk seals are foraging in the main Hawaiian Islands (MHI) and what covariates influence foraging behaviour in this region. This increased understanding will inform management strategies and supplement outreach and recovery efforts.

[1]  F. Parrish,et al.  HAWAIIAN MONK SEALS (MONACHUS SCHAUINSLANDI) FORAGING IN DEEP‐WATER CORAL BEDS , 2002 .

[2]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Reptilian diving: highly variable dive patterns in the green turtle Chelonia mydas , 1999 .

[3]  Ian Jonsen,et al.  Supervised accelerometry analysis can identify prey capture by penguins at sea , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[4]  Jason D. Baker,et al.  EFFECTS OF RESEARCH HANDLING ON THE ENDANGERED HAWAIIAN MONK SEAL , 2002 .

[5]  G. Antonelis,et al.  Foraging interaction between monk seals and large predatory fish in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands , 2008 .

[6]  Kyler Abernathy,et al.  Identification of Prey Captures in Australian Fur Seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus) Using Head-Mounted Accelerometers: Field Validation with Animal-Borne Video Cameras , 2015, PloS one.

[7]  L. Fuiman,et al.  Classification of Weddell seal dives based on 3-dimensional movements and video-recorded observations , 2003 .

[8]  Akinori Takahashi,et al.  Linking animal-borne video to accelerometers reveals prey capture variability , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  W. Bowen,et al.  Dive shapes reveal temporal changes in the foraging behaviour of different age and sex classes of harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) , 2002 .

[10]  M. Hindell,et al.  Three-dimensional dive profiles of free-ranging Weddell seals , 2000, Polar Biology.

[11]  D. Costa,et al.  Foraging energetics and diving behavior of lactating New Zealand sea lions, Phocarctos hookeri. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[12]  Kristian Beedholm,et al.  What a jerk: prey engulfment revealed by high-rate, super-cranial accelerometry on a harbour seal (Phoca vitulina) , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[13]  E. Shepard Identification of animal movement patterns using tri-axial accelerometry , 2008 .

[14]  M. Biuw,et al.  The intensity of horizontal and vertical search in a diving forager: the harbour seal , 2015, Movement ecology.

[15]  Peter T. Madsen,et al.  Keeping momentum with a mouthful of water: behavior and kinematics of humpback whale lunge feeding , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  N. Liebscha,et al.  Mouthing off about fish capture : Jaw movement in pinnipeds reveals the real secrets of ingestion , 2007 .

[17]  G. Andrew,et al.  arm: Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2014 .

[18]  Christopher C Wilmers,et al.  The golden age of bio-logging: how animal-borne sensors are advancing the frontiers of ecology. , 2015, Ecology.

[19]  Jason F. Schreer,et al.  COMPARATIVE DIVING PATTERNS OF PINNIPEDS AND SEABIRDS , 2001 .

[20]  D. Coltman,et al.  Balancing foraging and reproduction in the male harbour seal, an aquatically mating pinniped , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  K. Longenecker Fishes in the Hawaiian monk seal diet, based on regurgitate samples collected in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands , 2010 .

[22]  Deborah Austin,et al.  Stomach temperature telemetry reveals temporal patterns of foraging success in a free-ranging marine mammal. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[23]  L. Lowry,et al.  DIVING BEHAVIOR OF SUBADULT AND ADULT HARBOR SEALS IN PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND, ALASKA , 2001 .

[24]  Tomonori Hiraishi,et al.  Monitoring the spawning behaviour of chum salmon with an acceleration data logger , 2006 .

[25]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Prying into the intimate details of animal lives: use of a daily diary on animals , 2008 .

[26]  M. Plummer,et al.  CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC , 2006 .

[27]  Deborah Austin,et al.  Linking movement, diving, and habitat to foraging success in a large marine predator. , 2006, Ecology.

[28]  Samir I. Sayegh,et al.  Acoustic tracking system for monitoring under‐ice movements of polar seals , 1992 .

[29]  J. Baker,et al.  Effects of video camera attachment on the foraging behavior of immature Hawaiian monk seals , 2004 .

[30]  K. Yoda,et al.  A new technique for monitoring the behaviour of free-ranging Adélie penguins. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[31]  M. Heithaus,et al.  FORAGING OF JUVENILE MONK SEALS AT FRENCH FRIGATE SHOALS, HAWAII , 2005 .

[32]  C. Ware,et al.  Averaged Propulsive Body Acceleration (APBA) Can Be Calculated from Biologging Tags That Incorporate Gyroscopes and Accelerometers to Estimate Swimming Speed, Hydrodynamic Drag and Energy Expenditure for Steller Sea Lions , 2016, PloS one.

[33]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Moving towards acceleration for estimates of activity-specific metabolic rate in free-living animals: the case of the cormorant. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[34]  J. Speakman,et al.  Flipper strokes can predict energy expenditure and locomotion costs in free-ranging northern and Antarctic fur seals , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[35]  Rory P. Wilson,et al.  Assessing the development and application of the accelerometry technique for estimating energy expenditure. , 2011, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.

[36]  J. Baker,et al.  Translocation as a tool for conservation of the Hawaiian monk seal , 2011 .

[37]  Kit M. Kovacs,et al.  Functional classification of harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) dives using depth profiles, swimming velocity, and an index of foraging success , 1999 .

[38]  M. Fedak,et al.  Habitat use and diving behaviour of harbour seals in a coastal archipelago in Norway , 1995 .

[39]  C. Littnan,et al.  Dietary comparison of two Hawaiian monk seal populations: the role of diet as a driver of divergent population trends , 2013 .

[40]  R. Bannasch,et al.  Diving behaviour of gentoo penguins,Pygoscelis papua; factors keeping dive profiles in shape , 1996 .

[41]  Jason F. Schreer,et al.  STATISTICAL CLASSIFICATION OF DIVING BEHAVIOR , 1995 .

[42]  W. Bowen,et al.  Prey-dependent foraging tactics and prey profitability in a marine mammal , 2002 .

[43]  M. Hindell,et al.  Fine-scale three-dimensional spatial use by diving, lactating female Weddell seals Leptonychotes weddellii , 2002 .