The determination of particle size distribution by means of the photoelectric sedimentometer

The study of the properties of powders has received an increasing mount of attention during recent years.1 These properties my be classified, fiat, into bulk and average properties, and secondly, into individual properties. The bulk properties may be further divided into static and dynamic, the static properties being those which depend upon the static geometry of the powder. For example, bulk density, void distribution, flow through plugs and beds of powder, the number of contacts between powder particles and other packing properties arc static properties, whilst the dynamic ones are those concerned with Bow, such as angles of internal friction. The specific surface is an example of an average property. Individual properties arc those such as sizes and shapes of the panicles, and in these it is usually necessary to describe the results statistically by means of distribution functions. The size distribution is an important example of the latter. This details the number of individual grains in unit weight of a sample which have sizes within a differential range, and the first step in obtaining such a function is to describe the size in a convenient way. When the particles are all similar in shape, their sizes can be simply defined, but the further removed the particle shapes are from geometrical figures, the more difficult it becomes to describe the size by one parameter. There are a number of different ways of defining the size of grains; Green,1 Martin,3 Perrot and Kinney,4 Weigell,5 Work,6 Heywood7 and others recommend various “diameters” derived from microscopic methods. Other “diameters” are due to Andreasen, “and Oden” The diameter used depends partly upon the available methods of measuring or upon the likelihood of correlating it with some other property of interest. To take account of the limitations of the various methods, a further parameter, called the “shape factor” is often utilized. The “shape factor” in general terms usually implies some constant or parameter which will allow one parameter of the particle to be derived from another.

[1]  H. Rose,et al.  On the measurement of the size characteristics of powders by photo‐extinction methods. I. Theoretical considerations , 1946 .

[2]  K. Sollner A Simplified Method of Preparing Microscopic Glass Spheres , 1939 .

[3]  H. Heywood Measurement of the Fineness of Powdered Materials , 1938 .

[4]  L. R. Bacon Measurement of absolute viscosity by the falling sphere method , 1936 .

[5]  D. L. Bishop A sedimentation method for the determination of the particle size of finely divided materials (such as hydrated lime) , 1934 .

[6]  H. Heywood Calculation of the Specific Surface of a Powder , 1933 .

[7]  N. N. Andrejew Apparat für quantitative Untersuchungen der dispersen Systeme mit photoelektrischer Zelle , 1931 .

[8]  A. H. M. Andreasen Ueber die Gültigkeit des Stokes'schen Gesetzes für nicht kugelförmige Teilchen , 1929 .

[9]  H. Green The effect of non-uniformity and particle shape on “average particle size” , 1927 .

[10]  A. H. Pfund,et al.  Particle Size, Distribution and its Function in Paints and Enamels: A Relative Method of Determining Particle Size of Pigments1 , 1927 .

[11]  E. Crowther,et al.  An automatic and continuous recording balance. (The odén-keen balance.) , 1924 .

[12]  H. Green A photomicrographic method for the determination of particle size of paint and rubber pigments , 1921 .

[13]  S. Odén Eine neue Methode zur Bestimmung der Körnerverteilung in Suspensionen , 1916 .

[14]  H. D. Arnold LXXIV. Limitations imposed by slip and inertia terms upon Stoke's law for the motion of spheres through liquids , 1911 .

[15]  R. Ladenburg Über die innere Reibung zäher Flüssigkeiten und ihre Abhängigkeit vom Druck , 1907 .

[16]  H. S. A. M. B.Sc. XXXI. The motion of a sphere in a viscous fluid , 1900 .