Achieving Clinical Statement Interoperability Using R-MIM and Archetype-Based Semantic Transformations

Effective use of electronic healthcare records (EHRs) has the potential to positively influence both the quality and the cost of health care. Consequently, sharing patient's EHRs is becoming a global priority in the healthcare information technology domain. This paper addresses the interoperability of EHR structure and content. It describes how two different EHR standards derived from the same reference information model (RIM) can be mapped to each other by using archetypes, refined message information model (R-MIM) derivations, and semantic tools. It is also demonstrated that well-defined R-MIM derivation rules help tracing the class properties back to their origins when the R-MIMs of two EHR standards are derived from the same RIM. Using well-defined rules also enable finding equivalences in the properties of the source and target EHRs. Yet an R-MIM still defines the concepts at the generic level. Archetypes (or templates), on the other hand, constrain an R-MIM to domain-specific concepts, and hence, provide finer granularity semantics. Therefore, while mapping clinical statements between EHRs, we also make use of the archetype semantics. Derivation statements are inferred from the Web Ontology Language definitions of the RIM, the R-MIMs, and the archetypes. Finally, we show how to transform Health Level Seven clinical statement instances to EHRcom clinical statement instances and vice versa by using the generated mapping definitions.

[1]  F. Alan Andersen,et al.  The American National Standards Institute , 1984, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[2]  A L Rector,et al.  Goals for concept representation in the GALEN project. , 1993, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[3]  Yildiray Kabak,et al.  Artemis message exchange framework: semantic interoperability of exchanged messages in the healthcare domain , 2005, SGMD.

[4]  DogacAsuman,et al.  Artemis message exchange framework , 2005 .

[5]  P. V. Biron,et al.  The HL7 Clinical Document Architecture. , 2001, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[6]  D. Lindberg,et al.  Unified Medical Language System , 2020, Definitions.

[7]  Marco Eichelberg,et al.  A survey and analysis of Electronic Healthcare Record standards , 2005, CSUR.

[8]  Craig E. Kuziemsky,et al.  Ontology-based information integration in health care: a focus on palliative care , 2003, Eleventh Annual International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice.

[9]  Fabio Massimo Zanzotto,et al.  XeOML : An XML-based extensible Ontology Mapping Language , 2004 .

[10]  A. Dogac,et al.  Archetype-Based Semantic Interoperability of Web Service Messages in the Health Care Domain , 2005 .

[11]  Philippe Thiran,et al.  OWL-based approach for semantic interoperability , 2005, 19th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA'05) Volume 1 (AINA papers).

[12]  Marco Eichelberg,et al.  Enhancing IHE XDS for Federated Clinical Affinity Domain Support , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[13]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  The GRAIL concept modelling language for medical terminology , 1997, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[14]  Dan Brickley,et al.  Rdf vocabulary description language 1.0 : Rdf schema , 2004 .

[15]  Sam Heard,et al.  Exploiting ebXML registry semantic constructs for handling archetype metadata in healthcare informatics , 2006, Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontologies.

[16]  Amnon Shabo,et al.  Model Formulation: HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2 , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..