Dissecting the functional program of Escherichia coli promoters: the combined mode of action of Lac repressor and AraC activator.

The mode of action of regulated promoters is largely determined by kinetic parameters which govern the interaction between promoters and proteins involved in induction and repression of transcription. To gain insight into the interplay between positively and negatively acting transcriptional regulators, in this case AraC and LacR, we have generated a panel of promoter sequences derived from P(lac), the promoter of the Escherichia coli lac operon. The function of these promoters is limited at different steps and to various extents within the pathway of RNA polymerase (RNAP)/promoter interaction. Moreover, in all promoters the cAMP receptor protein binding site was replaced by the binding motif of AraC to prevent pleiotropic effects in vivo upon activation. Analyzing the activation of these promoters by AraC in vivo under conditions of repression by LacR and derepression yielded a three step model of transcription initiation which reveals mechanisms of AraC and LacR action. Our data show three distinct rate limiting steps at which AraC can exert its function. In general, the activator accelerates the formation of the first stable complex between RNAP and promoter. At most promoter sequences, however, its main impact is on the conversion of the closed to the open complex. However, AraC is also capable of eliminating limitations at steps following open complex formation.

[1]  H. Bujard,et al.  PL of coliphage lambda: an alternative solution for an efficient promoter. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[2]  B. Müller-Hill,et al.  The three operators of the lac operon cooperate in repression. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[3]  Robert Entriken,et al.  Escherichia coli promoter sequences predict in vitro RNA polymerase selectivity , 1984, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  M. Capp,et al.  Inhibition of Transcription Initiation buIacRepressor , 1995 .

[5]  H. Birnboim,et al.  A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. , 1979, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  M. Susskind,et al.  The effects of mutations in the ant promoter of phage P22 depend on context. , 1988, Genetics.

[7]  H. Bujard,et al.  Stalling of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase in the +6 to +12 region in vivo is associated with tight binding to consensus promoter elements. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  M. Jacquet,et al.  The kinetics of sigma subunit directed promoter recognition by E. coli RNA polymerase. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  F. Sanger,et al.  DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  J. Gralla,et al.  Interaction of RNA polymerase with lacUV5 promoter DNA during mRNA initiation and elongation. Footprinting, methylation, and rifampicin-sensitivity changes accompanying transcription initiation. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  M Lanzer,et al.  Promoters largely determine the efficiency of repressor action. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  C. Harley,et al.  Analysis of E. coli promoter sequences. , 1987, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  M. Ehrenberg,et al.  Activities of constitutive promoters in Escherichia coli. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  K. Wood,et al.  Firefly luciferase gene: structure and expression in mammalian cells , 1987, Molecular and cellular biology.

[15]  T. Dunn,et al.  Upstream repression and CRP stimulation of the Escherichia coli L-arabinose operon. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  H. Bujard,et al.  Independent and tight regulation of transcriptional units in Escherichia coli via the LacR/O, the TetR/O and AraC/I1-I2 regulatory elements. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  M. Record,et al.  Inhibition of transcription initiation by lac repressor. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  W. McClure,et al.  Mechanism and control of transcription initiation in prokaryotes. , 1985, Annual review of biochemistry.

[19]  J. Gralla,et al.  KMnO4 as a probe for lac promoter DNA melting and mechanism in vivo. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[20]  R. Burgess,et al.  A procedure for the rapid, large-scall purification of Escherichia coli DNA-dependent RNA polymerase involving Polymin P precipitation and DNA-cellulose chromatography. , 1975, Biochemistry.

[21]  R. Schleif,et al.  AraC protein can activate transcription from only one position and when pointed in only one direction. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  H. Bujard,et al.  Promoter recognition and promoter strength in the Escherichia coli system. , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[23]  J. Brosius,et al.  Characterization in vitro of the effect of spacer length on the activity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase at the TAC promoter. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[24]  H. Bujard,et al.  Promoters of Escherichia coli: a hierarchy of in vivo strength indicates alternate structures. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[25]  R. Schleif,et al.  Determining residue-base interactions between AraC protein and araI DNA. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  H. Bujard,et al.  Functional dissection of Escherichia coli promoters: information in the transcribed region is involved in late steps of the overall process. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[27]  H. Bujard,et al.  Principles Governing the Activity of E. coli Promoters , 1990 .

[28]  H. Bremer,et al.  Effects of Fis on ribosome synthesis and activity and on rRNA promoter activities in Escherichia coli. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  M. Thomas Record,et al.  RNA Polymerase-Promoter Interactions: the Comings and Goings of RNA Polymerase , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[30]  H. Bujard,et al.  Transcription from efficient promoters can interfere with plasmid replication and diminish expression of plasmid specified genes. , 1982, The EMBO journal.