Comparison of sandy soil shear strength parameters obtained by various construction direct shear apparatuses

An analysis of test results performed by common type of direct shear apparatuses shows that normal stress on the shear plane of soil sample is not equal to vertical component of distributed external load applied to the top of soil sample. Performed measurements cleared that only 65–85% of total vertical load is transmitted to the sample shear plane. Thus, determining of the soil shear strength depends on shear apparatus construction, i.e. on actual magnitude of vertical load transmitted to the shear plane. The paper presents an analysis of shear strength parameters of sand determined by two different construction of direct shear apparatuses with movable lower shear ring. The soil shear strength parameters by employing direct shear apparatus SPF-2 have been obtained under constant vertical load and measuring the vertical load at different positions, namely: at the bottom and that of at the top of soil sample, respectively. The soil strength parameters by employing the universal shear testing device ADS 1/3 were determined under two conditions, namely: by maintaining constant soil volume and that of for constant vertical load, respectively. In both cases the vertical load was measured at the top of soil sample.

[1]  Craig H. Benson,et al.  Comparison of shear strength of sand backfills measured in small-scale and large-scale direct shear tests , 2008 .

[2]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  The Direct Shear Strength and Dilatancy of Sand–gravel Mixtures , 2006 .

[3]  Colin Thornton,et al.  A numerical examination of the direct shear test , 2007 .

[4]  Peijun Guo,et al.  Modified Direct Shear Test for Anisotropic Strength of Sand , 2008 .

[5]  Colin Thornton,et al.  Numerical Simulations of the Direct Shear Test , 2003 .

[6]  Hajime Matsuoka,et al.  Simplified Direct Box Shear Test on Granular Materials and Its Application to Rockfill Materials. , 1998 .

[7]  David M. Potts,et al.  NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF DRAINED DIRECT AND SIMPLE SHEAR TESTS. DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE , 1993 .

[8]  Daiva Zilioniene,et al.  Evaluation of Soil Shear Strength Parameters via Triaxial Testing by Height Versus Diameter Ratio of Sample , 2009 .

[9]  De’an Sun,et al.  On the interface friction in direct shear test | NOVA. The University of Newcastle's Digital Repository , 2005 .

[10]  Matt S Dietz,et al.  An improved direct shear apparatus for sand , 2004 .

[11]  Jonas Amšiejus,et al.  Probabilistic Assessment of Soil Shear Strength Parameters Using Triaxial Test Results , 2007 .

[12]  Ivo Herle,et al.  Measurement of wall friction in direct shear tests on soft soil , 2012 .

[13]  Luis E. Vallejo,et al.  Discrete Element Method Evaluation of Granular Crushing Under Direct Shear Test Conditions , 2005 .

[14]  A Alikonis,et al.  IMPROVEMENT OF SHEAR BOX APPARATUS AND METHODOLOGY OF TEST , 1999 .

[15]  S. Liu,et al.  Simulating a direct shear box test by DEM , 2006 .

[16]  Alan J. Lutenegger,et al.  Specimen size and scale effects of direct shear box tests of sands , 2006 .

[17]  A Numerical View into Direct Shear Specimen Size Effects , 2007 .

[18]  Jonas Amšiejus,et al.  Stress‐strain analysis in the soil sample during laboratory testing , 2007 .