In-Vehicle Stopping Decision Advisory System for Drivers Approaching a Traffic Signal

All drivers are familiar with the basic traffic signal dilemma: whether to enter the intersection or to stop when they see the green phase ending. Wrong decisions to cross may lead to red light running (RLR) violations and to angle crashes; unnecessary stop decisions lead to excess queue and frustration and may lead to rear-end crashes. This study examined a conceptual in-vehicle system designed to facilitate the decision making of drivers approaching a signal. According to the distance from the traffic light and the remaining time for the green phase, the system provided an auditory and visual indication to drivers if they needed to stop. A driving simulator experiment was conducted with 20 participants; each participant drove through 28 interurban traffic lights, 14 with and 14 without the evaluated system. Results showed a 96% reduction in RLR violations and a 70% reduction in the behavioral dilemma zone range. Change in signal crossing decision probability was modest (6% reduction) and not statistically significant. An exploratory evaluation suggested that driver hesitation during the amber light was substantially reduced and that intersection clearing time was shorter and much more predictable. If similar effects occur in reality, fewer angle crashes and fewer rear-end crashes can be expected.

[1]  H Köll,et al.  Driver behaviour during flashing green before amber: a comparative study. , 2004, Accident Analysis and Prevention.

[2]  David Mahalel,et al.  The Flashing Green Light Paradox , 2012 .

[3]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Evaluation of Intersection Safety Camera Program in Edmonton, Canada , 2007 .

[4]  Yu-Chiun Chiou,et al.  Driver responses to green and red vehicular signal countdown displays: Safety and efficiency aspects. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Chong-Cheng Hsu,et al.  The effect of a collision warning system on the driving performance of young drivers at intersections , 2009 .

[6]  Kevin N. Balke,et al.  AWEGS using Intellidrive℠ Architecture--A Proof of Concept , 2011 .

[7]  Srinivasa R Sunkari,et al.  Performance of advance warning for end of green system for high-speed signalized intersections , 2005 .

[8]  Stephen H Richards,et al.  Impact of “Signal Ahead” pavement marking on driver behavior at signalized intersections , 2009 .

[9]  K. M. Lum,et al.  A before-and-after study on green signal countdown device installation , 2006 .

[10]  James A Bonneson,et al.  Investigation of time into red for red light-related crashes , 2005 .

[11]  Prahlad D Pant,et al.  ACTIVE ADVANCE WARNING SIGNS AT HIGH-SPEED SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS: RESULTS OF A STUDY IN OHIO , 1992 .

[12]  Panagiotis Papaioannou,et al.  Driver behaviour, dilemma zone and safety effects at urban signalized intersections in Greece. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  C. Farmer,et al.  Reducing red light running through longer yellow signal timing and red light camera enforcement: results of a field investigation. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  A. Aeron-Thomas,et al.  Red-light cameras for the prevention of road traffic crashes. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  Allan F. Williams,et al.  Changes in crash risk following re-timing of traffic signal change intervals. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Alena Erke Red light for red-light cameras? A meta-analysis of the effects of red-light cameras on crashes. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  James A Bonneson,et al.  Effect of Yellow-Interval Timing on the Frequency of Red-Light Violations at Urban Intersections , 2004 .

[18]  Robert Herman,et al.  A review of the yellow interval dilemma , 1996 .

[19]  Nicholas J Garber,et al.  Safety Impacts of Photo-Red Enforcement at Suburban Signalized Intersections an Empirical Bayes Approach , 2006 .

[20]  Kangwon Shin,et al.  The impact of red light cameras on safety in Arizona. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.