Lexical Creativity from Word Associations

A fluent ability to associate tasks, concepts, ideas, knowledge and experiences in a relevant way is often considered an important factor of creativity, especially in problem solving. We are interested in providing computational support for discovering such creative associations. In this paper we design minimally supervised methods that can perform well in the remote associates test (RAT), a well-known psychometric measure of creativity. We show that with a large corpus of text and some relatively simple principles, this can be achieved. We then develop methods for a more general word association model that could be used in lexical creativity support systems, and which also could be a small step towards lexical creativity in computers.

[1]  S. Mednick,et al.  Remote Associates Test, College, Adult, Form 1 and Examiner's Manual, Remote Associates Test, College and Adult Forms 1 and 2. , 1967 .

[2]  Hannu Toivonen,et al.  Biomine: predicting links between biological entities using network models of heterogeneous databases , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[3]  H. Pashler,et al.  Incubation benefits only after people have been misdirected , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Nada Lavrac,et al.  Bisociative Knowledge Discovery for Microarray Data Analysis , 2010, ICCC.

[5]  Graeme Hirst,et al.  Semantic distance in WordNet: An experimental, application-oriented evaluation of five measures , 2004 .

[6]  J. R. Firth,et al.  A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory, 1930-1955 , 1957 .

[7]  F. M. Andrews,et al.  Creative Thinking and Level of Intelligence , 1967 .

[8]  Zellig S. Harris,et al.  Distributional Structure , 1954 .

[9]  S. Mednick.  The associative basis of the creative process. , 1962, Psychological review.

[10]  R. G. Evans,et al.  The Remote Associates Test as a Predictor of Productivity in Brainstorming Groups , 1981 .

[11]  Ted Dunning,et al.  Accurate Methods for the Statistics of Surprise and Coincidence , 1993, CL.

[12]  G. Regehr,et al.  Intuition in the context of discovery , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  Pedro M. Domingos,et al.  On the Optimality of the Simple Bayesian Classifier under Zero-One Loss , 1997, Machine Learning.

[14]  George A. Miller,et al.  WordNet: A Lexical Database for English , 1995, HLT.

[15]  David P. Dailey.  An Analysis and Evaluation of the Internal Validity of the Remote Associates Test: What Does it Measure? , 1978 .

[16]  Sascha Topolinski,et al.  Where there's a will-there's no intuition. The unintentional basis of semantic coherence judgments , 2008 .

[17]  Richard A. Harshman,et al.  Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis , 1990, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[18]  Ewan Klein,et al.  Natural Language Processing with Python , 2009 .

[19]  Hannu Toivonen,et al.  Corpus-Based Generation of Content and Form in Poetry , 2012, ICCC.

[20]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Why Nouns Are Learned before Verbs: Linguistic Relativity Versus Natural Partitioning. Technical Report No. 257. , 1982 .

[21]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[22]  Erez Lieberman Aiden,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books , 2010, Science.

[23]  Mark Jung-Beeman,et al.  Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.