Factor analysis techniques for assessing sufficient unidimensionality of cancer related fatigue

Background: Fatigue is the most common unrelieved symptom experienced by people with cancer. The purpose of this study was to examine whether cancer-related fatigue (CRF) can be summarized using a single score, that is, whether CRF is sufficiently unidimensional for measurement approaches that require or assume unidimensionality. We evaluated this question using factor analysis techniques including the theory-driven bi-factor model. Methods: Five hundred and fifty five cancer patients from the Chicago metropolitan area completed a 72-item fatigue item bank, covering a range of fatigue-related concerns including intensity, frequency and interference with physical, mental, and social activities. Dimensionality was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) techniques. Results: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) techniques identified from 1 to 17 factors. The bi-factor model suggested that CRF was sufficiently unidimensional. Conclusions: CRF can be considered sufficiently unidimensional for applications that require unidimensionality. One such application, item response theory (IRT), will facilitate the development of short-form and computer-adaptive testing. This may further enable practical and accurate clinical assessment of CRF.

[1]  J. V. Von Roenn,et al.  An item bank was created to improve the measurement of cancer-related fatigue. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  David Cella,et al.  Item banking to improve, shorten and computerize self-reported fatigue: An illustration of steps to create a core item bank from the FACIT-Fatigue Scale , 2003, Quality of Life Research.

[3]  E. A. Jones,et al.  Fatigue associated with chronic liver disease: A riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma , 1995, Hepatology.

[4]  Ron D. Hays.  Computer Program Exchange , 1987 .

[5]  R. Hambleton,et al.  Fundamentals of Item Response Theory , 1991 .

[6]  P. Stone,et al.  Cancer-related fatigue: inevitable, unimportant and untreatable? Results of a multi-centre patient survey. Cancer Fatigue Forum. , 2000, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[7]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[8]  G. Karabatsos,et al.  Validation of the Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis quality of life instrument , 1996, Neurology.

[9]  D. Cella,et al.  Cancer-related fatigue: prevalence of proposed diagnostic criteria in a United States sample of cancer survivors. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  W. Velicer.  Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations , 1976 .

[11]  J. Denburg,et al.  Psychological aspects of systemic lupus erythematosus: cognitive function, mood, and self-report. , 1997, The Journal of rheumatology.

[12]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis : The effect of sample size , 1988 .

[13]  B. Garssen,et al.  Fatigue in cancer patients. , 1993, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. , 1999 .

[15]  D. Cella,et al.  Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system. , 1997, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[16]  William Stout,et al.  A New Item Response Theory Modeling Approach with Applications to Unidimensionality Assessment and Ability Estimation , 1990 .

[17]  G. Kraft,et al.  Symptomatic fatigue in multiple sclerosis. , 1984, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  Larry Hatcher,et al.  A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling , 1994 .

[19]  R. Cattell.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[20]  James C. Hayton,et al.  Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: a Tutorial on Parallel Analysis , 2004 .

[21]  H. Kaiser.  The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis , 1960 .

[22]  Richard G. Lomax,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2022 .

[23]  J. Parker,et al.  Predictors of subjective fatigue among individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. , 1998, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[24]  D. Cella,et al.  Assessing Quality of Life in Oncology Clinical Practice: A Review of Barriers and Critical Success Factors , 2002 .

[25]  Louis W. Glorfeld.  An Improvement on Horn's Parallel Analysis Methodology for Selecting the Correct Number of Factors to Retain , 1995 .

[26]  Donald Hedeker,et al.  Full-information item bi-factor analysis , 1992 .

[27]  R E Slaughter,et al.  The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer. , 1998, Oncology nursing forum.

[28]  S. Embretson,et al.  Item response theory for psychologists , 2000 .

[29]  L. Tucker,et al.  A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1973 .

[30]  R. Srivastava.  Fatigue in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients , 1989 .

[31]  C. Cleeland,et al.  The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients , 1999, Cancer.

[32]  D. Cella,et al.  Fatigue in cancer patients compared with fatigue in the general United States population , 2002, Cancer.

[33]  Jenq-Wen Huang,et al.  Chronic Fatigue in Long-Term Peritoneal Dialysis Patients , 2000, American Journal of Nephrology.

[34]  J. Beals,et al.  The Structure of Problem and Positive Behavior Among American Indian Adolescents: Gender and Community Differences , 1997, American journal of community psychology.

[35]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Test Theory: A Unified Treatment , 1999 .

[36]  C. Akinsanya.  Cancer pain relief and palliative care , 1992 .

[37]  J. Horn.  A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis , 1965, Psychometrika.

[38]  W. Velicer,et al.  Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. , 1986 .

[39]  G. Lyman,et al.  Measurement of Fatigue in Cancer Patients: Development and Validation of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory , 1998, Quality of Life Research.

[40]  E. Smets,et al.  The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. , 1995, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[41]  P. Fayers,et al.  Health-related quality of life in the general Norwegian population assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire: the QLQ=C30 (+ 3). , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[42]  F. Wolfe,et al.  The prevalence and meaning of fatigue in rheumatic disease. , 1996, The Journal of rheumatology.

[43]  B. Zumbo.  A Handbook on the Theory and Methods of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELING AS A UNITARY FRAMEWORK FOR BINARY AND LIKERT-TYPE (ORDINAL) ITEM SCORES , 1999 .

[44]  S. Passik,et al.  Fatigue in ambulatory AIDS patients. , 1998, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[45]  David J. Kerr,et al.  Cancer-related fatigue: inevitable, unimportant and untreatable? Results of a multi-centre patient survey. Cancer Fatigue Forum. , 2000, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[46]  B P O'Connor,et al.  SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[47]  Wayne F. Velicer,et al.  Construct Explication through Factor or Component Analysis: A Review and Evaluation of Alternative Procedures for Determining the Number of Factors or Components , 2000 .