Supporting Fourth Graders’ Ability to Interpret Graphs Through Real-Time Graphing Technology: A Preliminary Study

This study examined to what extent inquiry-based instruction supported with real-time graphing technology improves fourth grader’s ability to interpret graphs as representations of physical science concepts such as motion and temperature. This study also examined whether there is any difference between inquiry-based instruction supported with real-time graphing software and inquiry-based instruction supported with traditional laboratory equipment in terms of improving fourth graders’ ability to interpret motion and temperature graphs. Results of this study showed that there is a significant advantage in using real-time graphing technology to support fourth graders’ ability to interpret graphs.

[1]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Why Students May not Learn to Interpret Scientific Inscriptions , 2002 .

[2]  Camille L. Wainwright.  The Effectiveness of a Computer-Assisted Instruction Package in High School Chemistry. , 1989 .

[3]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications , 2008 .

[4]  Zacharias C. Zacharia,et al.  Enhancing Fourth Graders' Ability to Interpret Graphical Representations through the Use of Microcomputer-Based Labs Implemented within an Inquiry-Based Activity Sequence. , 2007 .

[5]  Mark Millar.  Technology in the Lab; Part I: What Research Says about Using Probeware in the Science Classroom , 2005 .

[6]  Ricardo Trumper,et al.  What Are Microcomputer-Based Laboratories (MBLs) for? An Example from Introductory Kinematics , 2002 .

[7]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  THE EFFECT OF SIMULTANEOUS MOTION PRESENTATION AND GRAPH GENERATION IN A KINEMATICS LAB , 1990 .

[8]  Robert Tinker,et al.  Learning Science in Grades 3–8 Using Probeware and Computers: Findings from the TEEMSS II Project , 2008 .

[9]  Rafi Nachmias,et al.  Cognitive consequences of microcomputer-based laboratories: Graphing skills development* , 1987 .

[10]  Jonte Bernhard,et al.  Physics Learning and Microcomputer Based Laboratory (MBL) Learning Effects of Using MBL as a Technological and as a Cognitive Tool , 2003 .

[11]  Gaea Leinhardt,et al.  Functions, Graphs, and Graphing: Tasks, Learning, and Teaching , 1990 .

[12]  Heather Brasell,et al.  The effect of real‐time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity , 1987 .

[13]  Mark van 't Hooft,et al.  Inquiry-Based Instruction Through Handheld-Based Science Activities: Preservice Teachers’ Attitude and Self-Efficacy , 2006 .

[14]  John E. Sasser.  The effect of using computer tutorials as homework assignments on the mathematics achievements of elementary education majors , 1991 .

[15]  Irina Lyublinskaya,et al.  Integrating Graphing Calculators and Probeware Into Science Methods Courses: Impact on Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Confidence and Perspectives on Technology for Learning and Teaching , 2008 .

[16]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  The Use Of Handhelds In School Science:A water quality study , 2008 .

[17]  Leah P. McCoy.  The effect of geometry tool software on high school geometry achievement , 1991 .

[18]  Rafi Nachmias,et al.  Learning Scientific Reasoning Skills in Microcomputer-Based Laboratories , 1990 .

[19]  Pamela Van Scotter,et al.  The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins, Effectiveness, and Applications , 2006 .

[20]  David W. Brooks,et al.  Cookbook Procedures in MBL Physics Exercises , 2003 .

[21]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs , 1994 .

[22]  Ömer Geban,et al.  Effectiveness of Using Computer-Assisted Supplementary Instruction for Teaching the Mole Concept , 1995 .

[23]  James A. Kulik,et al.  Instructional Technology and College Teaching , 1980 .

[24]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Data and graph interpretation practices among preservice science teachers , 2005 .

[25]  Regan L. Mandryk,et al.  Supporting children's collaboration across handheld computers , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[26]  J. Mokros,et al.  The impact of microcomputer‐based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs , 1987 .

[27]  Randy Yerrick,et al.  Meeting the Needs of Middle Grade Science Learners through Pedagogical and Technological Intervention. , 2009 .

[28]  P. W. Laws,et al.  Millikan Lecture 1996: Promoting active learning based on physics education research in introductory physics courses , 1997 .

[29]  John W. Shrum,et al.  The effects of microcomputer‐based laboratory exercises on the acquisition of line graph construction and interpretation skills by high school biology students , 1990 .

[30]  Nora H. Sabelli.  For our children's sake, take full advantage of technology , 1995 .

[31]  Ömer Geban,et al.  Effects of Computer Simulations and Problem-Solving Approaches on High School Students , 1992 .

[32]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[33]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. , 1991 .