Structural origin of slow diffusion in protein folding

Interactions that slow protein folding As proteins fold, they diffuse over an energy barrier that separates unfolded and folded states. The transition path defines how a single protein crosses the barrier and so contains key information on the mechanism of folding. Transition paths have not yet been experimentally observed, but Chung et al. have discovered which structural features of the protein affect the duration of the transition. As the protein folds, non-native salt bridges form and break, slowing diffusion along the transition path. Science, this issue p. 1504 Single-molecule experiments and simulations show how molecular interactions can direct protein folding by slowing diffusion. Experimental, theoretical, and computational studies of small proteins suggest that interresidue contacts not present in the folded structure play little or no role in the self-assembly mechanism. Non-native contacts can, however, influence folding kinetics by introducing additional local minima that slow diffusion over the global free-energy barrier between folded and unfolded states. Here, we combine single-molecule fluorescence with all-atom molecular dynamics simulations to discover the structural origin for the slow diffusion that markedly decreases the folding rate for a designed α-helical protein. Our experimental determination of transition path times and our analysis of the simulations point to non-native salt bridges between helices as the source, which provides a quantitative glimpse of how specific intramolecular interactions influence protein folding rates by altering dynamics and not activation free energies.

[1]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: A synthesis , 1994, Proteins.

[2]  Jane Clarke,et al.  Experimental evidence for a frustrated energy landscape in a 3-helix bundle protein family , 2009, Nature.

[3]  Jane Clarke,et al.  Localizing internal friction along the reaction coordinate of protein folding by combining ensemble and single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy , 2012, Nature Communications.

[4]  W. Eaton,et al.  Measuring ultrafast protein folding rates from photon-by-photon analysis of single molecule fluorescence trajectories. , 2013, Chemical physics.

[5]  E. Henry,et al.  Chemical, physical, and theoretical kinetics of an ultrafast folding protein , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Scott H. Northrup,et al.  The stable states picture of chemical reactions. I. Formulation for rate constants and initial condition effects , 1980 .

[7]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  Ultrafast folding of α3D: A de novo designed three-helix bundle protein , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  R. Dror,et al.  How Fast-Folding Proteins Fold , 2011, Science.

[9]  J. Hofrichter,et al.  Effect of Viscosity on the Kinetics of α-Helix and β-Hairpin Formation , 2001 .

[10]  G. Papoian,et al.  Concerted dihedral rotations give rise to internal friction in unfolded proteins. , 2014, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[11]  W. Eaton,et al.  Characterizing the unfolded states of proteins using single-molecule FRET spectroscopy and molecular simulations , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Joan-Emma Shea,et al.  Transmission Coefficients, Committors, and Solvent Coordinates in Ion-Pair Dissociation. , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[13]  C. M. Jones,et al.  The role of solvent viscosity in the dynamics of protein conformational changes. , 1992, Science.

[14]  K. Lindorff-Larsen,et al.  How robust are protein folding simulations with respect to force field parameterization? , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[15]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Viscosity Dependence of the Folding Rates of Proteins , 1997, cond-mat/9705309.

[16]  Jane Clarke,et al.  Separating the effects of internal friction and transition state energy to explain the slow, frustrated folding of spectrin domains , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  G. Hummer,et al.  Reaction coordinates and rates from transition paths. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  A. Szabó,et al.  Decoding the pattern of photon colors in single-molecule FRET. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[19]  H. Chung,et al.  Fast single-molecule FRET spectroscopy: theory and experiment. , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[20]  G. Hummer From transition paths to transition states and rate coefficients. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[21]  M. Klein,et al.  Nosé-Hoover chains : the canonical ensemble via continuous dynamics , 1992 .

[22]  A. Szabó,et al.  Single-molecule FRET with diffusion and conformational dynamics. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[23]  William A. Eaton,et al.  Single molecule fluorescence probes dynamics of barrier crossing , 2013, Nature.

[24]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Dynamics of ion pair interconversion in a polar solvent , 1990 .

[25]  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen,et al.  Atomistic description of the folding of a dimeric protein. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[26]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The experimental survey of protein-folding energy landscapes , 2005, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[27]  Mike Heilemann,et al.  A reducing and oxidizing system minimizes photobleaching and blinking of fluorescent dyes. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[28]  Hoover,et al.  Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[29]  W. DeGrado,et al.  Solution structure and dynamics of a de novo designed three-helix bundle protein. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Andrew J. Viterbi,et al.  Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm , 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[31]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Native contacts determine protein folding mechanisms in atomistic simulations , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Shoji Takada,et al.  Microscopic Theory of Protein Folding Rates.II: Local Reaction Coordinates and Chain Dynamics , 2000, cond-mat/0008455.

[33]  Peter G Wolynes,et al.  Frustration in biomolecules , 2013, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[34]  William A Eaton,et al.  Experimental determination of upper bound for transition path times in protein folding from single-molecule photon-by-photon trajectories , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  H. Kramers Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions , 1940 .

[36]  John E. Straub,et al.  Time scales and pathways for kinetic energy relaxation in solvated proteins: Application to carbonmonoxy myoglobin , 2000 .

[37]  K. Lindorff-Larsen,et al.  Atomic-level description of ubiquitin folding , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  William A Eaton,et al.  Extracting rate coefficients from single-molecule photon trajectories and FRET efficiency histograms for a fast-folding protein. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[39]  R. Best,et al.  Dependence of Internal Friction on Folding Mechanism , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[40]  B. Schuler,et al.  Single-molecule spectroscopy of protein folding dynamics--expanding scope and timescales. , 2013, Current opinion in structural biology.

[41]  M. Orrit Chemical and physical aspects of charge transfer in the fluorescence intermittency of single molecules and quantum dots , 2010, Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology.

[42]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[43]  J. Dzubiella,et al.  Peptide chain dynamics in light and heavy water: zooming in on internal friction. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[44]  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen,et al.  Protein folding kinetics and thermodynamics from atomistic simulation , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  J. Hofrichter,et al.  Diffusion-limited contact formation in unfolded cytochrome c: estimating the maximum rate of protein folding. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  J. Hofrichter,et al.  The protein folding 'speed limit'. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[47]  William A Eaton,et al.  Measuring internal friction of an ultrafast-folding protein , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  R. Best,et al.  Molecular Origins of Internal Friction Effects on Protein Folding Rates , 2014, Nature Communications.

[49]  Kevin J. McHale,et al.  Single-Molecule Fluorescence Experiments Determine Protein Folding Transition Path Times , 2012, Science.

[50]  J. Onuchic,et al.  DIFFUSIVE DYNAMICS OF THE REACTION COORDINATE FOR PROTEIN FOLDING FUNNELS , 1996, cond-mat/9601091.

[51]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[52]  J. Clarke,et al.  Protein Folding: Adding a Nucleus to Guide Helix Docking Reduces Landscape Roughness , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[53]  Joseph A. Bank,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S10 Table S1 References Movies S1 to S3 Atomic-level Characterization of the Structural Dynamics of Proteins , 2022 .