A comparative study of protein synthesis in in vitro systems: from the prokaryotic reconstituted to the eukaryotic extract-based

BackgroundCell-free protein synthesis is not only a rapid and high throughput technology to obtain proteins from their genes, but also provides an in vitro platform to study protein translation and folding. A detailed comparison of in vitro protein synthesis in different cell-free systems may provide insights to their biological differences and guidelines for their applications.ResultsProtein synthesis was investigated in vitro in a reconstituted prokaryotic system, a S30 extract-based system and a eukaryotic system. Compared to the S30 system, protein synthesis in the reconstituted system resulted in a reduced yield, and was more cold-sensitive. Supplementing the reconstituted system with fractions from a size-exclusion separation of the S30 extract significantly increased the yield and activity, to a level close to that of the S30 system. Though protein synthesis in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems showed no significant differences for eukaryotic reporter proteins, drastic differences were observed when an artificial fusion protein was synthesized in vitro. The prokaryotic systems failed to synthesize and correctly fold a significant amount of the full-length fusion protein, even when supplemented with the eukaryotic lysate. The active full-length fusion protein was synthesized only in the eukaryotic system.ConclusionThe reconstituted bacterial system is sufficient but not efficient in protein synthesis. The S30 system by comparison contains additional cellular factors capable of enhancing protein translation and folding. The eukaryotic translation machinery may have evolved from its prokaryotic counterpart in order to translate more complex (difficult-to-translate) templates into active proteins.

[1]  Jim Swartz,et al.  Developing cell-free biology for industrial applications , 2006, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[2]  Takuya Ueda,et al.  Protein synthesis by pure translation systems. , 2005, Methods.

[3]  H. Taguchi,et al.  Chaperone-assisted folding of a single-chain antibody in a reconstituted translation system. , 2004, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[4]  C. Gualerzi,et al.  Transcriptional and post-transcriptional control of cold-shock genes. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  P. Brick,et al.  Crystal structure of firefly luciferase throws light on a superfamily of adenylate-forming enzymes. , 1996, Structure.

[6]  Bei-Wen Ying,et al.  Efficient protein selection based on ribosome display system with purified components. , 2007, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[7]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Recent advances in producing and selecting functional proteins by using cell-free translation. , 1998, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[8]  J W Szostak,et al.  RNA-peptide fusions for the in vitro selection of peptides and proteins. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  J. Frydman.  Folding of newly translated proteins in vivo: the role of molecular chaperones. , 2001, Annual review of biochemistry.

[10]  J. Szostak,et al.  Ribosomal synthesis of unnatural peptides. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[11]  G. Kramer,et al.  Expression of different coding sequences in cell‐free bacterial and eukaryotic systems indicates translational pausing on Escherichia coli ribosomes , 2000, FEBS letters.

[12]  Joseph D Puglisi,et al.  Quantitative polysome analysis identifies limitations in bacterial cell-free protein synthesis. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[13]  F. Hartl,et al.  Recombination of protein domains facilitated by co-translational folding in eukaryotes , 1997, Nature.

[14]  S. Blacklow,et al.  Pure translation display. , 2004, Analytical biochemistry.

[15]  Geoffrey Chang,et al.  The past, present and future of cell-free protein synthesis. , 2005, Trends in biotechnology.

[16]  J. Douthwaite,et al.  Highly efficient ribosome display selection by use of purified components for in vitro translation. , 2006, Journal of immunological methods.

[17]  Takuya Ueda,et al.  Cell-free translation reconstituted with purified components , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  F. Hartl,et al.  Principles of Chaperone-Assisted Protein Folding: Differences Between in Vitro and in Vivo Mechanisms , 1996, Science.

[19]  G. Zubay,et al.  In vitro synthesis of protein in microbial systems. , 1973, Annual review of genetics.

[20]  Judith Frydman,et al.  Folding of nascent polypeptide chains in a high molecular mass assembly with molecular chaperones , 1994, Nature.

[21]  Y. Baba,et al.  Efficiency of cell-free protein synthesis based on a crude cell extract from Escherichia coli, wheat germ, and rabbit reticulocytes. , 2008, Journal of biotechnology.