Addressing competitiveness and leakage concerns in climate policy: An analysis of border adjustment measures in the US and the EU

The implementation of climate policies in the US and EU in light of uncertainties about future international climate policy has shifted attention to two interrelated concerns, namely competitiveness and carbon leakage. Although various policy measures are available to address these concerns, there has been much discussion about one such measure in particular: the use of offsetting measures at the border. This article compares policy discussions in the US and the EU on how to address competitiveness and carbon leakage concerns, with a focus on the role of import-related border adjustment measures. It analyses the kinds of measures that so far have been put forward with a view to addressing competitiveness and carbon leakage; compares the approaches to the problems in the US and the EU; and provides a preliminary discussion of international cooperation on border adjustment measures. It concludes that two kinds of cooperation are needed between the EU and the US - not only cooperation through formal international negotiations, but also cooperation through international learning processes, in which the EU and the US learn from each other about design and implementation issues as they develop their respective cap-and-trade systems.

[1]  Frank Biermann,et al.  Implementing the Kyoto Protocol without the USA: the strategic role of energy tax adjustments at the border , 2004 .

[2]  Joost Pauwelyn.  U.S. Federal Climate Policy and Competitiveness Concerns: The Limits and Options of International Trade Law , 2007 .

[3]  Trevor Houser,et al.  Leveling the Carbon Playing Field: International Competition and US Climate Policy Design , 2008 .

[4]  Karoline S. Rogge,et al.  EU emissions trading: an early analysis of national allocation plans for 2008–2012 , 2006 .

[5]  T. Manders,et al.  Border tax adjustment and the EU-ETS, a quantitative assessment , 2008 .

[6]  J. D. Cendra.  Can Emission Trading Schemes be Coupled with Border Tax Adjustments? An Analysis vis-à-vis WTO Law , 2006 .

[7]  K. Neuhoff,et al.  Border Tax Adjustments: A Feasible way to Support Stringent Emission Trading , 2007 .

[8]  John Whalley,et al.  Leveling the Carbon Playing Field: International Competition and US Climate Policy Design by Trevor Houser, Rob Bradley, Britt Childs, Jacob Werksman and Robert Heilmayr Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2008 , 2009, World Trade Review.

[9]  Jason E. Bordoff.  International Trade Law and the Economics of Climate Policy: Evaluating the Legality and Effectiveness of Proposals to Address Competitiveness and Leakage Concerns , 2009, Brookings Trade Forum.

[10]  Christian Egenhofer,et al.  The Making of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme:: Status, Prospects and Implications for Business , 2007 .

[11]  European Emissions Trading — the Business Perspective , 2002 .

[12]  Adam.  Climate and trade policies in a post-2012 world , 2009 .

[13]  J. Hovi,et al.  The United States and international climate cooperation: International "pull" versus domestic "push" , 2007 .

[14]  Daniel W. Drezner,et al.  The Economic and Environmental Effects of Border Tax Adjustments for Climate Policy , 2009, Brookings Trade Forum.

[15]  S. Agrawala,et al.  Indispensability and Indefensibility? The United States in the Climate Treaty Negotiations , 1999 .

[16]  Alan K. Fox,et al.  Comparing Policies to Combat Emissions Leakage: Border Carbon Adjustments versus Rebates , 2011 .

[17]  S. Charnovitz,et al.  Trade and Climate Change: A Report by the United Nations Environment Programme and the World Trade Organization by UNEP and the WTO Geneva: WTO, 2009 , 2010 .

[18]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  Mission Impossible !? On the Harmonization of National Allocation Plans under the EU Emissions Trading Directive , 2004 .

[19]  S. Oberthür,et al.  EU Leadership in International Climate Policy: Achievements and Challenges , 2008 .

[20]  T. Brewer.  The trade regime and the climate regime: institutional evolution and adaptation , 2003 .

[21]  Frank Biermann,et al.  European emissions trading and the international competitiveness of energy-intensive industries: A legal and political evaluation of possible supporting measures , 2007 .

[22]  Angela Köppl,et al.  Stringency and Distribution in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme - The 2005 Evidence , 2007 .

[23]  Michael Grubb,et al.  Allocation and competitiveness in the EU emissions trading scheme: policy overview , 2006 .

[24]  A. Ellerman,et al.  The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: Origins, Allocation, and Early Results , 2007, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[25]  ZhongXiang Zhang.  Encouraging Developing Country Involvement in a Post-2012 Climate Change Regime: Carrots, Sticks or Both? , 2009 .

[26]  T. Brewer,et al.  The WTO and the Kyoto Protocol: interaction issues , 2004 .

[27]  F. Sindico.  The EU and Carbon Leakage: How to Reconcile Border Adjustments with the WTO? , 2008, European Energy and Environmental Law Review.

[28]  Christiane Gerstetter,et al.  Trade and climate change , 2009 .

[29]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  Climate change policy and international trade: Policy considerations in the US , 2009 .