Mesh-morphing algorithms for specimen-specific finite element modeling.

Despite recent advances in software for meshing specimen-specific geometries, considerable effort is still often required to produce and analyze specimen-specific models suitable for biomechanical analysis through finite element modeling. We hypothesize that it is possible to obtain accurate models by adapting a pre-existing geometry to represent a target specimen using morphing techniques. Here we present two algorithms for morphing, automated wrapping (AW) and manual landmarks (ML), and demonstrate their use to prepare specimen-specific models of caudal rat vertebrae. We evaluate the algorithms by measuring the distance between target and morphed geometries and by comparing response to axial loading simulated with finite element (FE) methods. First a traditional reconstruction process based on microCT was used to obtain two natural specimen-specific FE models. Next, the two morphing algorithms were used to compute mappings from the surface of one model, the source, to the other, the target, and to use this mapping to morph the source mesh to produce a target mesh. The microCT images were then used to assign element-specific material properties. In AW the mappings were obtained by wrapping the source and target surfaces with an auxiliary triangulated surface. In ML, landmarks were manually placed on corresponding locations on the surfaces of both source and target. Both morphing algorithms were successful in reproducing the shape of the target vertebra with a median distance between natural and morphed models of 18.8 and 32.2 microm, respectively, for AW and ML. Whereas AW-morphing produced a surface more closely resembling that of the target, ML guaranteed correspondence of the landmark locations between source and target. Morphing preserved the quality of the mesh producing models suitable for FE simulation. Moreover, there were only minor differences between natural and morphed models in predictions of deformation, strain and stress. We therefore conclude that it is possible to use mesh-morphing techniques to produce accurate specimen-specific FE models of caudal rat vertebrae. Mesh morphing techniques provide advantages over conventional specimen-specific finite element modeling by reducing the effort required to generate multiple target specimen models, facilitating intermodel comparisons through correspondence of nodes and maintenance of connectivity, and lends itself to parametric evaluation of "artificial" geometries with a focus on optimizing reconstruction.

[1]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  A statistical method for robust 3D surface reconstruction from sparse data , 2004, Proceedings. 2nd International Symposium on 3D Data Processing, Visualization and Transmission, 2004. 3DPVT 2004..

[2]  S R Arridge,et al.  A method for generating patient-specific finite element meshes for head modelling. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  R W Prager,et al.  3D shape recovery of a newborn skull using thin-plate splines. , 2000, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[4]  C. R. Ethier,et al.  Factors influencing optic nerve head biomechanics. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  Jyh-Horng Chen,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Reconstruction and Modeling of Middle Ear Biomechanics by High‐Resolution Computed Tomography and Finite Element Analysis , 2006, The Laryngoscope.

[6]  Ruth K Wilcox The influence of material property and morphological parameters on specimen-specific finite element models of porcine vertebral bodies. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  D C Barber,et al.  Automatic segmentation of medical images using image registration: diagnostic and simulation applications , 2005, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[8]  Robert Davis Cook,et al.  Finite Element Modeling for Stress Analysis , 1995 .

[9]  R. T. Hart,et al.  Shape adaptation of long bone structures using a contour based approach , 2005, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[10]  J. Weiss,et al.  Subject-specific finite element model of the pelvis: development, validation and sensitivity studies. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  John G. Sled,et al.  Mechanics of Individual-Specific Models of the Corneo-Scleral Shell in Glaucoma , 2007 .

[12]  Bernhard Preim,et al.  Comparison of Fundamental Mesh Smoothing Algorithms for Medical Surface Models , 2006, SimVis.

[13]  J. Banavar,et al.  Computer Simulation of Liquids , 1988 .

[14]  M. Viceconti,et al.  The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[15]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  An improved method for the automatic mapping of computed tomography numbers onto finite element models. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[16]  Suzanne M. Shontz,et al.  A Mesh Warping Algorithm Based on Weighted Laplacian Smoothing , 2003, IMR.

[17]  C. Whyne,et al.  Quantitative characterization of metastatic disease in the spine. Part I. Semiautomated segmentation using atlas-based deformable registration and the level set method. , 2007, Medical physics.

[18]  S Weghorst,et al.  Creating fast finite element models from medical images. , 2000, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[19]  Jinxiang Dong,et al.  Rapidly generate lumbar spine volume mesh , 2005, Ninth International Conference on Computer Aided Design and Computer Graphics (CAD-CG'05).

[20]  Vicente Grau,et al.  Segmentation of trabeculated structures using an anisotropic Markov random field: application to the study of the optic nerve head in glaucoma , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  Y Payan,et al.  The mesh-matching algorithm: an automatic 3D mesh generator for finite element structures. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Nikhil S. Phatak,et al.  Noninvasive Determination of Ligament Strain with Deformable Image Registration , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  H. David Sheets,et al.  Geometric morphometrics for biologists : a primer , 2004 .

[24]  K. Brock,et al.  Accuracy of finite element model-based multi-organ deformable image registration. , 2005, Medical physics.

[25]  K. Brock,et al.  Feasibility of a novel deformable image registration technique to facilitate classification, targeting, and monitoring of tumor and normal tissue. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  A fast and simple stretch-minimizing mesh parameterization , 2004, Proceedings Shape Modeling Applications, 2004..

[27]  Justin W. Fernandez,et al.  Anatomically based geometric modelling of the musculo-skeletal system and other organs , 2004, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[28]  Thomas W. Sederberg,et al.  Free-form deformation of solid geometric models , 1986, SIGGRAPH.

[29]  Hanif M. Ladak,et al.  Template-based finite-element mesh generation from medical images , 2005, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[30]  Alla Sheffer,et al.  Shape preserving mesh deformation , 2004, SIGGRAPH '04.

[31]  Jeffrey A. Weiss,et al.  Use of medical image data to compute strain fields in biological tissue , 1997 .

[32]  Ivana Kolingerová,et al.  Morphing of meshes with attributes , 2004, SCCG '04.

[33]  S. Lele,et al.  The promise of geometric morphometrics. , 2002, American journal of physical anthropology.

[34]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  Fast and intuitive generation of geometric shape transitions , 2000, The Visual Computer.

[35]  P J Hunter,et al.  A cerebral palsy assessment tool using anatomically based geometries and free-form deformation , 2005, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[36]  T. Vetter,et al.  A statistical method for robust 3D surface reconstruction from sparse data , 2004 .

[37]  J. Weiss,et al.  Strain measurement in coronary arteries using intravascular ultrasound and deformable images. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[38]  R. Krause,et al.  Automatic construction of boundary parametrizations for geometric multigrid solvers , 2006 .

[39]  Peter J Hunter,et al.  The use of sparse CT datasets for auto-generating accurate FE models of the femur and pelvis. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[40]  Linping Zhao,et al.  Finite element (FE) modeling of the mandible: from geometric model to tetrahedral volumetric mesh. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[41]  Marc Alexa,et al.  Local control for mesh morphing , 2001, Proceedings International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications.

[42]  F L Bookstein,et al.  Describing a craniofacial anomaly: finite elements and the biometrics of landmark locations. , 1987, American journal of physical anthropology.

[43]  Thomas Lange,et al.  Visualization of the variability of 3D statistical shape models by animation. , 2004, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[44]  Mathieu Charlebois,et al.  Validation of a voxel-based FE method for prediction of the uniaxial apparent modulus of human trabecular bone using macroscopic mechanical tests and nanoindentation. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[45]  Anton E. Bowden,et al.  Warping template finite element models into alignment with subject specific image data , 1998 .

[46]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Automatic generation of accurate subject-specific bone finite element models to be used in clinical studies. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[47]  P. M. Ku ASME winter annual meeting , 1978 .

[48]  Anne Verroust-Blondet,et al.  Three-dimensional metamorphosis: a survey , 1998, The Visual Computer.

[49]  Anton E. Bowden,et al.  Anatomical registration and segmentation by warping template finite element models , 1998, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.