Examining interindividual differences in select muscle and whole‐body adaptations to continuous endurance training

What is the central question of the study? Do interindividual differences in trainability exist for morphological and molecular skeletal muscle responses to aerobic exercise training? What is the main finding and its importance? Interindividual differences in trainability were present for some, but not all, morphological and molecular outcomes included in our study. Our findings suggest that it is inappropriate, and perhaps erroneous, to assume that variability in observed responses reflects interindividual differences in trainability in skeletal muscle responses to aerobic exercise training.

[1]  B. Gurd,et al.  Risk of bias and reporting practices in studies comparing VO2max responses to sprint interval vs. continuous training: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2021, Journal of sport and health science.

[2]  B. Gurd,et al.  Exercise response variability: Random error or true differences in exercise response? , 2020, Experimental physiology.

[3]  B. Gurd,et al.  Repeatability of training-induced skeletal muscle adaptations in active young males. , 2020, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[4]  C. G. Perry,et al.  A comparison of pain responses, hemodynamic reactivity and fibre type composition between Bergström and microbiopsy skeletal muscle biopsies , 2020, Current research in physiology.

[5]  Y. Burelle,et al.  Fiber-specific and whole-muscle LRP130 expression in rested, exercised, and fasted human skeletal muscle , 2020, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology.

[6]  Kevin A. Murach,et al.  Cores of Reproducibility in Physiology (CORP): Fiber Typing Human Skeletal Muscle with Fluorescent Immunohistochemistry. , 2019, Journal of applied physiology.

[7]  R. Ross,et al.  An appraisal of the SDIR as an estimate of true individual differences in training responsiveness in parallel‐arm exercise randomized controlled trials , 2019, Physiological reports.

[8]  D. Hood,et al.  Maintenance of Skeletal Muscle Mitochondria in Health, Exercise, and Aging. , 2019, Annual review of physiology.

[9]  R. Ross,et al.  Individual Variability in Waist Circumference and Body Weight in Response to Exercise , 2019, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  B. Gurd,et al.  Does blood lactate predict the chronic adaptive response to training: A comparison of traditional and talk test prescription methods. , 2019, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[11]  F. Amati,et al.  Distinct patterns of skeletal muscle mitochondria fusion, fission and mitophagy upon duration of exercise training , 2018, Acta physiologica.

[12]  Jeremy J. Walsh,et al.  Interindividual variability and individual responses to exercise training in adolescents with obesity. , 2020, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[13]  D. Hood,et al.  Autophagy and mitophagy flux in young and aged skeletal muscle following chronic contractile activity , 2018, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  A. Batterham,et al.  Inter‐individual differences in weight change following exercise interventions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2018, Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[15]  Tim Meyer,et al.  Repeated testing for the assessment of individual response to exercise training. , 2018, Journal of applied physiology.

[16]  M. Tschakovsky,et al.  Contribution of central and peripheral adaptations to changes in maximal oxygen uptake following 4 weeks of sprint interval training. , 2018, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[17]  J. Bangsbo,et al.  Exercise and exercise training‐induced increase in autophagy markers in human skeletal muscle , 2018, Physiological reports.

[18]  D. Bishop,et al.  The gene SMART study: method, study design, and preliminary findings , 2017, BMC Genomics.

[19]  W. Bloch,et al.  Influence of endurance training on skeletal muscle mitophagy regulatory proteins in type 2 diabetic men , 2017, Endocrine research.

[20]  Leonard A Kaminsky,et al.  Importance of Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Clinical Practice: A Case for Fitness as a Clinical Vital Sign A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association , 2016, Circulation.

[21]  W. Hopkins Individual responses made easy. , 2015, Journal of applied physiology.

[22]  A. Batterham,et al.  True and false interindividual differences in the physiological response to an intervention , 2015, Experimental physiology.

[23]  G. Parise,et al.  Fibre-Specific Responses to Endurance and Low Volume High Intensity Interval Training: Striking Similarities in Acute and Chronic Adaptation , 2014, PloS one.

[24]  Michael I Lambert,et al.  High Responders and Low Responders: Factors Associated with Individual Variation in Response to Standardized Training , 2014, Sports Medicine.

[25]  J. Quadrilatero,et al.  Rapid Determination of Myosin Heavy Chain Expression in Rat, Mouse, and Human Skeletal Muscle Using Multicolor Immunofluorescence Analysis , 2012, PloS one.

[26]  D. Jones,et al.  Variability in the magnitude of response of metabolic enzymes reveals patterns of co‐ordinated expression following endurance training in women , 2011, Experimental physiology.

[27]  N. Vollaard,et al.  Systematic analysis of adaptations in aerobic capacity and submaximal energy metabolism provides a unique insight into determinants of human aerobic performance. , 2009, Journal of applied physiology.

[28]  S. Halpern Evaluating preference effects in partially unblinded, randomized clinical trials. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[29]  T. Treasure,et al.  Minimisation: the platinum standard for trials? , 1998, BMJ.

[30]  C. Bouchard,et al.  Inheritance of Human Skeletal Muscle and Anaerobic Capacity Adaptation to High-Intensity Intermittent Training* , 1986, International journal of sports medicine.