Change of state and valency

The goal of this article is twofold. First, I explore the hypothesis that a number of regularities in the distribution of the two types of inchoative constructions with verbs of change of state in French, the superficially intransitive construction and the reflexive construction (illustrated in (1)–(3)), can be captured by an analysis whereby monovalent verbs of change of state may project the Patient argument to the subject or to the object position. When the Patient argument is projected to the subject position (as in (1a) and (3a)), the construction is unergative. When it is projected to the object position, the construction is unaccusative (as in (1b)–(3b)). Verbs of change of state in French diner as to whether they may enter an intransitive inchoative construction (1), a reflexive inchoative construction (2) or both (3).

[1]  Masayoshi Shibatani,et al.  The grammar of causative constructions , 1976 .

[2]  Luigi Burzio,et al.  Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach , 1986 .

[3]  Uriel Weinreich,et al.  On semantics , 1980 .

[4]  M. Zubizarreta.  The relation between morphophonology and morphosyntax: the case of Romance causatives , 1985 .

[5]  Glynn Winskel,et al.  Event Structures , 1986, Advances in Petri Nets.

[6]  H. Borer.  The syntax of pronominal clitics , 1986 .

[7]  Co Vet,et al.  Temps, aspects et adverbes de temps en francais contemporain: Essai de semantique formelle , 1982 .

[8]  Jack Burston.  The pronominal verb construction in French: An argument against the fortuitous homonomy hypothesis , 1979 .

[9]  Lorraine S. Levin.  Operations on lexical forms : unaccusative rules in Germanic languages , 1985 .

[10]  Nicolas Ruwet,et al.  Théorie syntaxique et syntaxe du français , 1975 .

[11]  Anna Maria Di Sciullo.  MODULARITY AND THE MAPPING FROM THE LEXICON TO THE SYNTAX , 1990 .

[12]  Carol Lee Tenny.  Studies in generative approaches to aspect , 1988 .

[13]  Van Valin,et al.  Semantic Parameters of Split Intransitivity , 1990 .

[14]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[15]  Géraldine Legendre.  Object raising in French: A unified account , 1986 .

[16]  Géraldine Legendre.  Topics in French Syntax , 1994 .

[17]  T. Hoekstra,et al.  UNERGATIVES AS COPULAR VERBS; LOCATIONAL AND EXISTENTIAL PREDICATION , 1990 .

[18]  J. V. Oosten.  The nature of subjects, topics and agents : a cognitive explanation , 1984 .

[19]  A. Zribi-Hertz,et al.  La réflexivité ergative en français moderne , 1987 .

[20]  Marianne Mithun,et al.  Active/agentive case marking and its motivations , 1991 .

[21]  Samuel Jay Keyser,et al.  Recent transformational studies in European languages , 1978 .

[22]  S. J. Keyser,et al.  On the middle and ergative constructions in English , 1984 .

[23]  C. Tenny.  Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness , 1987 .

[24]  Mark C. Baker,et al.  Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing , 1988 .

[25]  R. Oehrle,et al.  Books Awaiting Review , 1984, CL.

[26]  Nicolas Ruwet,et al.  Weather-verbs and the unaccusative hypothesis , 1989 .

[27]  Géraldine Legendre,et al.  Unaccusativity in French , 1989 .

[28]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Topic...comment , 1988 .

[29]  Maria Luisa Zubizarreta,et al.  Levels of representation in the lexicon and in the syntax , 1987 .

[30]  Mira Rothemberg,et al.  Les verbes à la fois transitifs et intransitifs en français contemporain , 1974 .

[31]  David M. Perlmutter,et al.  MULTIATTACHMENT AND THE UNACCUSATIVE HYPOTHESIS: THE PERFECT AUXILIARY IN ITALIAN , 1989 .

[32]  Brian D. Joseph,et al.  Studies in relational grammar , 1984 .

[33]  M. Baltin,et al.  The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .

[34]  Scott Delancey,et al.  Notes on Agentivity and Causation , 1984 .

[35]  Margaret E. Winters,et al.  Studies in Romance linguistics , 1988 .

[36]  La construction impersonnelle et la structure de la phrase , 1989 .