Experimental and numerical evaluation of CO2 huff-n-puff processes in Bakken formation

Abstract Experimental and numerical techniques have been developed to evaluate performance of CO 2 huff-n-puff processes for unlocking resources from the Bakken tight oil formations. Experimentally, a series of coreflooding tests have been conducted by using core samples collected from the Bakken tight formation with a permeability range of 0.27–0.83 mD. The performance of four recovery schemes (i.e., waterflooding, immiscible CO 2 huff-n-puff, near-miscible CO 2 huff-n-puff, and miscible CO 2 huff-n-puff processes) has been comparatively evaluated. Theoretically, numerical simulation is performed to match the experimental measurements and then extended for evaluating field-scale CO 2 huff-n-puff performance in the Bakken formation. Once the history matching on either the experimental measurements or the field geological model is completed, the tuned numerical model is then employed to optimize the injection pressure, soaking time, and production pressure, respectively. It is experimentally found that the waterflooding process leads to a higher oil recovery factor of 51.5% in comparison with the immiscible CO 2 huff-n-puff process, while both the near-miscible and miscible CO 2 huff-n-puff processes result in a higher recovery efficiency with the final recovery factors of 63.0% and 61.0% of OOIP, respectively. As for the history matched reservoir geological model, either a higher injection pressure or a lower production pressure usually results in better recovery performance but lower than the corresponding experimental measurements, while recovery factor can be optimized if soaking time of 15 days is applied in this study.

[1]  Matthew T. Balhoff,et al.  Effect of Reservoir Heterogeneity on Primary Recovery and CO2 Huff 'n' Puff Recovery in Shale-Oil Reservoirs , 2014 .

[2]  Shengnan Chen,et al.  Simulation and Optimization of CO 2 Huff-and-Puff Processes in Tight Oil Reservoirs , 2016 .

[3]  Daoyong Yang,et al.  Performance evaluation of injectivity for water-alternating-CO2 processes in tight oil formations , 2015 .

[4]  D. Beliveau,et al.  Waterflood and CO2 Flood of the Fractured Midale Field (includes associated paper 22947 ) , 1993 .

[5]  X. Zhou,et al.  EOS Simulation for CO 2 Huff-n-Puff Process , 2005 .

[6]  Adam Wilson Modeling of EOR in Shale Reservoirs Stimulated by Cyclic Gas Injection , 2015 .

[7]  Daoyong Yang,et al.  A damped iterative EnKF method to estimate relative permeability and capillary pressure for tight formations from displacement experiments , 2016 .

[8]  Kamy Sepehrnoori,et al.  CO2 injection for enhanced oil recovery in Bakken tight oil reservoirs , 2015 .

[9]  Janet K. Pitman,et al.  Diagenesis and fracture development in the Bakken Formation, Williston Basin; implications for reservoir quality in the middle member , 2001 .

[10]  Atsushi Hatakeyama,et al.  Fluid Saturation Monitoring by Cased Hole Logging for CO 2 Huff-n-Puff Test in a Vietnam Offshore Field , 2013 .

[11]  J. Sheng Increase liquid oil production by huff-n-puff of produced gas in shale gas condensate reservoirs , 2015 .

[12]  R. Barati,et al.  A comprehensive approach to sweet-spot mapping for hydraulic fracturing and CO2 huff-n-puff injection in Chattanooga shale formation , 2016 .

[13]  D. J. MacAllister Evaluation of CO2 Flood Performance: North Coles Levee CO2 Pilot, Kern County, California , 1989 .

[14]  Yongan Gu,et al.  Interfacial Tensions of the Crude Oil + Reservoir Brine + CO2 Systems at Pressures up to 31 MPa and Temperatures of 27 °C and 58 °C , 2005 .

[15]  C. Ehlig-Economides,et al.  Petroleum production systems , 1993 .

[16]  Sixu Zheng,et al.  Enhanced Swelling Effect and Viscosity Reduction of Solvent(s)/CO2/Heavy-Oil Systems , 2013 .

[17]  M. Dong,et al.  A Laboratory Study on Near-Miscible CO Injection in Steelman Reservoir , 2001 .

[18]  Erling Halfdan Stenby,et al.  Review of WAG Field Experience , 2001 .

[19]  Bing Wei,et al.  Experimental investigation of CO2 huff-n-puff process for enhancing oil recovery in tight reservoirs , 2016 .

[20]  A. Kane Performance Review of a Large-Scale CO2-WAG Enhanced Recovery Project, SACROC Unit Kelly-Snyder Field , 1979 .

[21]  Helen K. Haskin,et al.  An Evaluation of CO2 Huff 'n' Puff Tests in Texas , 1989 .