Balancing on a tightrope: Managing the boundaries of a firm-sponsored OSS community and its impact on innovation and absorptive capacity

Realizing the innovation potential of OSS communities, firms now create or sponsor their own open source software (OSS) communities, generally as part of an open innovation strategy. However, maximizing the innovation capability of a sponsored OSS community is a challenging task since firms cannot rely on traditional hierarchical authority to control community members. Furthermore, a firm's efforts to manage its sponsored community may also impact the firm's absorptive capacity, or its ability to effectively absorb and leverage the valuable knowledge created by the community. Thus, the purpose of this article is to investigate two research questions: 1) How does the boundary management of a firm-sponsored OSS community impact the community's innovation capacity? and 2) How does the boundary management of a firm-sponsored OSS community impact the firm's absorptive capacity? Using the results from our qualitative analysis of eZ Systems and its successfully sponsored OSS community - eZ Publish - we develop a theoretical model depicting how the boundary management of a firm-sponsored OSS community influences both the community's innovation capacity and the absorptive capacity of the firm. In addition, the results of our study highlight the central importance of an integrative IT platform in boundary management activities.

[1]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation , 2006 .

[2]  Sylwia Męcfal.  Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[3]  R. Coase.  The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[4]  Sharon F. Matusik,et al.  Absorptive Capacity in the Software Industry: Identifying Dimensions That Affect Knowledge and Knowledge Creation Activities , 2005 .

[5]  J. Henkel.  Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux (gekürzte Version) , 2006 .

[6]  E. Huizingh.  Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives , 2011 .

[7]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  From communities of practice to mycorrhizae , 2013 .

[8]  Robert M. Mason,et al.  The negotiation and selection of horizontal mechanisms to support post-implementation ERP organizations , 2012, Inf. Technol. People.

[9]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[10]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[11]  Thierry Burger-Helmchen,et al.  User Communities and Social Software in the Video Game Industry , 2011 .

[12]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Applying Common Identity and Bond Theory to Design of Online Communities , 2007 .

[13]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Future of Competition: Co-Creating Unique Value With Customers , 2004 .

[14]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[15]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation , 2004 .

[16]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Co‐creating unique value with customers , 2004 .

[17]  Paul Michael Di Gangi,et al.  Steal my idea! Organizational adoption of user innovations from a user innovation community: A case study of Dell IdeaStorm , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[18]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[19]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[20]  Fiona Murray,et al.  Exploring the Foundations of Cumulative Innovation: Implications for Organization Science , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[21]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[22]  D. Faems,et al.  Book review: Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm / by H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke and J. West. - Oxford University Press. - ISBN 978-0-19929072-7 , 2008 .

[23]  Margit Osterloh,et al.  Open Source Software Development - Just Another Case of Collective Invention? , 2004 .

[24]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[25]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Boundary Management in Online Communities: Case Studies of the Nine Inch Nails and ccMixter Music Remix Sites , 2011 .

[26]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research , 2002 .

[27]  T. Lawrence,et al.  Virtually Embedded Ties , 2004 .

[28]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  Mats Magnusson,et al.  How do firms make use of open source communities , 2008 .

[30]  S. Nambisan,et al.  Interactions in virtual customer environments: Implications for product support and customer relationship management , 2007 .

[31]  Stephen R. Barley,et al.  The emergence of a new commercial actor: community managed software projects , 2002 .

[32]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Community, Joining, and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation: A Case Study , 2003 .

[33]  W. Stam.  When Does Community Participation Enhance the Performance of Open Source Software Companies? , 2008 .

[34]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm , 2001, ArXiv.

[35]  Magnus Bergquist,et al.  Open source in the firm : Opening up professional practices of software development , 2011 .

[36]  J. West,et al.  Challenges of Open Innovation: The Paradox of Firm Investment in Open-Source Software , 2006 .

[37]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  Boundary Organizations: Enabling Collaboration among Unexpected Allies , 2008 .

[38]  Michel Avital,et al.  From Green IT to Sustainable Innovation , 2010, AMCIS.

[39]  Elson Szeto,et al.  Innovation capacity: working towards a mechanism for improving innovation within an inter‐organizational network , 2000 .

[40]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  The Promise of Research on Open Source Software , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[41]  Joel West,et al.  The Role of Participation Architecture in Growing Sponsored Open Source Communities , 2008 .

[42]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  Why Do Users Contribute to Firm-Hosted User Communities? The Case of Computer-Controlled Music Instruments , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[43]  W. Swap,et al.  Resource allocation beyond firm boundaries: A multi-level model for Open Source innovation , 2004 .

[44]  William G. Ouchi,et al.  Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans. , 1980 .

[45]  Roy T. Fielding,et al.  Shared leadership in the Apache project , 1999, CACM.

[46]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[47]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[48]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Making sense of qualitative data , 1996 .

[49]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[50]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[51]  Martin W. Wallin,et al.  A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets , 2006 .

[52]  M. Markus.  The governance of free/open source software projects: monolithic, multidimensional, or configurational? , 2007 .

[53]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[54]  Sonali K. Shah.  Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[55]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  The Penguin Has Entered the Building: The Commercialization of Open Source Software Products , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[56]  R. Veugelers.  Internal R & D expenditures and external technology sourcing , 1997 .

[57]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[58]  Martin W. Wallin,et al.  Organizing for Open Innovation:: Focus on the Integration of Knowledge , 2010 .

[59]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[60]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .

[61]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Relationships Between Open Source Software Companies and Communities: Observations from Nordic Firms , 2005 .

[62]  David Shields,et al.  A history of IBM's open-source involvement and strategy , 2005, IBM Syst. J..

[63]  Björn Lundell,et al.  The Servicitization of Peer Production: Reflections on the Open Source Software Experience , 2008, Information Technology in the Service Economy.

[64]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community , 2007 .

[65]  Sebastian Spaeth,et al.  Carrots and Rainbows: Motivation and Social Practice in Open Source Software Development , 2012, MIS Q..

[66]  Siobhan O’Mahony,et al.  The governance of open source initiatives: what does it mean to be community managed? , 2007 .

[67]  Siobhan O’Mahony.  Guarding the commons: how community managed software projects protect their work , 2003 .