OBJECTIVES
This study examined the influence of six handling techniques on the strength of four phosphate-bonded investment (PBI) materials. The size and distribution of pores produced by the handling techniques were investigated and their effect on room temperature strength determined.
METHODS
Specimens were tested for strength using four point bend at a cross-head speed of 1 mm min-1. The fracture surface of randomly selected specimens was viewed through a light microscope to determine the pore size. A three-parameter Weibull distribution was used to describe strength giving values of Weibull modulus and characteristic strength.
RESULTS
The handling technique that produced the smallest pore size resulted in the highest strength. Significant differences in strength (90% confidence level) were found between most handling techniques. The reduction of pore size by mechanical spatulation and setting under pressure was found to be the most effective method of increasing the strength of PBI.
SIGNIFICANCE
Previous studies have related handling technique to the inclusion of air bubbles in dental investments but have not reported any consequent effect on strength. PBI materials are used in production of a range of dental appliances with a variety of different material forming processes and are required to withstand the loads applied without fracture or distortion to ensure accuracy of fit of these prostheses. The use of a handling technique that reduces pore size can significantly increase the strength of PBIs, thereby decreasing the possibility of die fracture or degradation.
[1]
A M Lacy,et al.
Incidence of bubbles on samples cast in a phosphate-bonded investment.
,
1985,
The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.
[2]
H. Luk,et al.
Strength of phosphate-bonded investments at high temperature.
,
1991,
Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[3]
J S Brudvik,et al.
Vacuum-air pressure investing.
,
1973,
The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.
[4]
W. J. O'brien,et al.
Dental Materials and Their Selection
,
2002
.
[5]
Jaroslav Menčík,et al.
Strength and fracture of glass and ceramics
,
1992
.
[6]
A. Juszczyk,et al.
Analysis of strength data using two- and three-parameter Weibull models
,
1998
.