Utilising nuclear energy for low carbon heating services in the UK

If new build nuclear reactors are built in the UK they will provide a large low carbon thermal resource that can be recovered for heating services through heat networks (district heating). There are however questions about the geographic location of nuclear sites relative to heating demand and public/user interpretations of a potentially controversial technology to consider. This thesis includes three research themes that explore these issues. The first is an assessment of potential non-technical barriers to nuclear heat network development. The second is a focus group approach to studying local resident responses to nuclear heat network technology both as potential users, and as public groups. The third theme considers the technical potential for a heat network connecting the Hartlepool nuclear site to local heating demand centres. The research finds that there is potential for nuclear heat networks to take 70,000 existing users off the natural gas in the Hartlepool area. Following series of expert interviews it finds no non-technical barriers that would be unique to nuclear heat networks as opposed to other heat network types. It also suggests that the technology could be acceptable to local residents if it is framed as a local resource that benefits the local area. These findings indicate that there could be similar potential at Heysham and Oldbury nuclear sites.

[1]  K. Green,et al.  System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability , 2004 .

[2]  B. Boardman,et al.  Making cold homes warmer: the effect of energy efficiency improvements in low-income homes A report to the Energy Action Grants Agency Charitable Trust , 2000 .

[3]  R. Blong,et al.  Defining area at risk and its effect in catastrophe loss estimation: a dasymetric mapping approach , 2004 .

[4]  Denis Loveridge,et al.  Nano-worlds as Schumpeterian emergence and Polanyian double-movements , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[5]  Paul Upham,et al.  Don’t lock me in: Public opinion on the prospective use of waste process heat for district heating , 2012 .

[6]  Rob P. J. M. Raven,et al.  Multi-Regime Interactions in the Dutch Energy Sector: The Case of Combined Heat and Power Technologies in the Netherlands 1970–2000 , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[7]  Alexey Makarov,et al.  Basic principles of energy policy in the U.S.S.R , 1987 .

[8]  Yupeng Wu,et al.  Interactions between the physical soil environment and a horizontal ground coupled heat pump, for a domestic site in the UK , 2012 .

[9]  M. Nagai,et al.  Small PWRs using coated particle fuel for district heating, PFPWR50 , 2005 .

[10]  Paul Dewick,et al.  Networks and Innovation: Sustainable Technologies in Scottish Social Housing , 2004 .

[11]  B. Verspagen,et al.  Knowledge flows : analyzing the core literature of innovation, entrepreneurship and science and technology studies , 2012 .

[12]  R. Lamb,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..

[13]  Ramiz Babus'Haq,et al.  Combined heat-and-power implementation in the UK: Past, present and prospective developments , 1996 .

[14]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Climate change or nuclear power-No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain , 2008 .

[15]  Greg F. Naterer,et al.  Synergistic roles of off-peak electrolysis and thermochemical production of hydrogen from nuclear energy in Canada , 2008 .

[16]  K. Anderson,et al.  From long-term targets to cumulative emission pathways: Reframing UK climate policy , 2008 .

[17]  Jungmin Kang Analysis of nuclear proliferation resistance , 2005 .

[18]  Materials Section Thorium fuel cycle : potential benefits and challenges , 2005 .

[19]  Timothy Abram,et al.  Generation-IV nuclear power: A review of the state of the science , 2008 .

[20]  Judi Marshall Centre for Action Research in Professional Practice , 2014 .

[21]  Neil Strachan,et al.  Methodological review of UK and international low carbon scenarios , 2010 .

[22]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[23]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Analysing the breakthrough of rock ‘n’ roll (1930–1970) Multi-regime interaction and reconfiguration in the multi-level perspective , 2007 .

[24]  Michael Nye,et al.  Sociopsychological Perspectives on the Active Roles of Domestic Actors in Transition to a Lower Carbon Electricity Economy , 2010 .

[25]  Stuart McLain,et al.  Nuclear power reactors , 1955, Electrical Engineering.

[26]  T. K. Thiyagarajan,et al.  A conceptual scheme for electrical power generation from nuclear waste heat using liquid metal magnetohydrodynamic energy converter , 1995 .

[27]  Webster Mort Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change , 2007 .

[28]  Neville Adrian Martin,et al.  Lerwick district heating scheme Shetland Islands, UK , 2010 .

[29]  Daniel Weisser,et al.  A guide to life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from electric supply technologies , 2007 .

[30]  K. Steemers,et al.  A method of formulating energy load profile for domestic buildings in the UK , 2005 .

[32]  R. Cowan Nuclear Power Reactors: A Study in Technological Lock-in , 1990, The Journal of Economic History.

[33]  Chang Huajian,et al.  Some features of the nuclear heating reactor (NHR) design in China , 1995 .

[34]  J. Krigger Air Source Heat Pumps , 2001 .

[35]  Carly McLachlan Technologies in Place: Symbolic Interpretations of Renewable Energy , 2009 .

[36]  P. Margen The use of nuclear energy for district heating , 1978 .

[37]  Leslie Daryl Danny Harvey,et al.  A Handbook on Low-Energy Buildings and District-Energy Systems : Fundamentals, Techniques and Examples , 2012 .

[38]  Vasilis Fthenakis,et al.  Greenhouse-gas emissions from solar electric-and nuclear power : A life-cycle study , 2007 .

[39]  Andreas Göbel Safety aspects of the 200 MWth Siemens Nuclear District Heating Plant, including accident management measures , 1991 .

[40]  Michelle Shipworth,et al.  Thermostat settings in English houses: No evidence of change between 1984 and 2007 , 2011 .

[41]  Rachel Warren,et al.  Impacts of global climate change at different annual mean global temperature increases , 2006 .

[42]  T. Oreszczyn,et al.  Determinants of winter indoor temperatures in low income households in England , 2006 .

[43]  Aikaterini Fragaki,et al.  Do liberalised electricity markets help or hinder CHP and district heating? The case of the UK , 2008 .

[44]  Paul Denholm,et al.  Decarbonizing the electric sector: Combining renewable and nuclear energy using thermal storage , 2012 .

[45]  G. Finnveden,et al.  Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user's guide , 2006 .

[46]  Karen Bickerstaff,et al.  PUBLIC UNDERSTANDINGS OF AIR POLLUTION: THE LOCALISATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RISK , 2001 .

[47]  Geoffrey F. Hewitt,et al.  Introduction to Nuclear Power , 1987 .

[48]  Matthew Leach,et al.  Building a roadmap for heat 2050 scenarios and heat delivery in the UK , 2010 .

[49]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[50]  Graeme Maidment,et al.  Combined cooling heat and power in supermarkets , 2002 .

[51]  R Winder,et al.  Impediments to policy implementation: the offer of free installation of central heating to an elderly community has limited uptake. , 2006, Public health.

[52]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear energy: A review , 2008 .

[53]  V. Utgikar,et al.  Life cycle assessment of high temperature electrolysis for hydrogen production via nuclear energy , 2006 .

[54]  William F. Pickard,et al.  Finessing the fuel: Revisiting the challenge of radioactive waste disposal , 2010 .

[55]  Peter Simmons,et al.  Absencing/presencing risk: Rethinking proximity and the experience of living with major technological hazards , 2009, Geoforum.

[56]  Dejan Mumovic,et al.  A review of bottom-up building stock models for energy consumption in the residential sector , 2010 .

[57]  Kristina Holmgren,et al.  Role of a district-heating network as a user of waste-heat supply from various sources : the case of Göteborg , 2006 .

[58]  Wang Dazhong,et al.  NHR-200 nuclear energy system and its possible applications , 1995 .

[59]  T. Foxon,et al.  Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of cleaner technologies: some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime , 2008 .

[60]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Valuing the Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Nuclear Power: A Critical Survey , 2008 .

[61]  F. Geels Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[62]  Gregory C. Unruh Escaping carbon lock-in , 2002 .

[63]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms : theories of technology transfer and energy in buildings , 1998 .

[64]  Eric D. Beinhocker The Origin of Wealth - Evolution, Complexity, and the Radical Remaking of Economics , 2007 .

[65]  Anique Hommels Obduracy and Urban Sociotechnical Change , 2000 .

[66]  Anders N. Andersen,et al.  Exploration of economical sizing of gas engine and thermal store for combined heat and power plants in the UK , 2008 .

[67]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  Science and technology studies: exploring the knowledge base , 2011 .

[68]  R. Gross,et al.  UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures , 2005 .

[69]  Robert Lowe,et al.  Evidence for heat losses via party wall cavities in masonry construction , 2007 .

[70]  D. Venables,et al.  From the familiar to the extraordinary: local residents’ perceptions of risk when living with nuclear power in the UK , 2010 .

[71]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  On the Difference between Chalk and Cheese—A Response to Whitmarsh et al's Comments on “beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change” , 2011 .

[72]  Communities English House condition Survey , 2013 .

[73]  ‘A Collision of Adverse Opinions’? Major Projects, Planning Inquiries, and Policy Change , 2002 .

[74]  R. M. E Diamant David Kut District heating and cooling for energy conservation , 1981 .

[75]  Ramiz Babus'Haq,et al.  Combined heat-and-power market-penetration in the UK: Problems and opportunities , 1994 .

[76]  Mark Harvey,et al.  Analysing distributed processes of provision and innovation , 2003 .

[77]  W. McDowall,et al.  Forecasts, scenarios, visions, backcasts and roadmaps to the hydrogen economy: A review of the hydrogen futures literature , 2006 .

[78]  Poul Erik Grohnheit,et al.  Competition in the market for space heating. District heating as the infrastructure for competition among fuels and technologies , 2003 .

[79]  Ghislaine M. Lawrence The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology , 1989, Medical History.

[80]  G. Walker,et al.  Carbon reduction, 'the public' and renewable energy: engaging with socio-technical configurations. , 2007 .

[81]  D. Edge,et al.  The social shaping of technology , 1988 .

[82]  E. Shove,et al.  Caution! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management , 2007 .

[83]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Recent Canadian advances in nuclear-based hydrogen production and the thermochemical Cu–Cl cycle , 2009 .

[84]  Stephen Potter,et al.  Getting warmer: a field trial of heat pumps , 2010 .

[85]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  The oxygen production step of a copper–chlorine thermochemical water decomposition cycle for hydrogen production: Energy and exergy analyses , 2009 .

[86]  J. Hertin,et al.  Socio-economic futures in climate change impact assessment: using scenarios as ‘learning machines’ , 2002 .

[87]  Ralph E.H. Sims,et al.  Carbon emission and mitigation cost comparisons between fossil fuel, nuclear and renewable energy resources for electricity generation , 2003 .

[88]  Malcolm Eames,et al.  Towards a sustainable hydrogen economy: A multi-criteria sustainability appraisal of competing hydrogen futures , 2007 .

[89]  Per Hall,et al.  25 years after Chernobyl: lessons for Japan? , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[90]  D. Bell,et al.  The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions: Explanations and Policy Responses , 2005 .

[91]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy , 2005 .

[92]  Jørgen Erik Christensen,et al.  Low-energy district heating in energy-efficient building areas , 2011 .

[93]  B. Metz,et al.  Climate change 2007 : mitigation of climate change :contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth assessmentreport of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[94]  E. Shove Converging Conventions of Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience , 2003 .

[95]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Dynamics in socio-technical systems : typology of change processes and contrasting case studies , 2007 .

[96]  David J. C. MacKay Sustainable Energy - Without the Hot Air , 2008 .

[97]  Geoff Green,et al.  Psychosocial routes from housing investment to health: Evidence from England's home energy efficiency scheme , 2012 .

[98]  Lingai Luo,et al.  Heat transportation from the Bugey power plant , 2009 .

[99]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[100]  Carly McLachlan,et al.  'You don't do a chemistry experiment in your best china': Symbolic interpretations of place and technology in a wave energy case , 2009 .

[101]  Andrew Hargadon,et al.  When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the Design of the Electric Light , 2001 .

[102]  Andrew J. Wright What is the relationship between built form and energy use in dwellings , 2008 .