Ultrasound Myocardial Elastography and Registered 3D Tagged MRI: Quantitative Strain Comparison

Ultrasound Myocardial Elastography (UME) and Tagged Magnetic Resonance Imaging (tMRI) are two imaging modalities that were developed in the recent years to quantitatively estimate the myocardial deformations. Tagged MRI is currently considered as the gold standard for myocardial strain mapping in vivo. However, despite the low SNR nature of ultrasound signals, echocardiography enjoys the widespread availability in the clinic, as well as its low cost and high temporal resolution. Comparing the strain estimation performances of the two techniques has been of great interests to the community. In order to assess the cardiac deformation across different imaging modalities, in this paper, we developed a semi-automatic intensity and gradient based registration framework that rigidly registers the 3D tagged MRIs with the 2D ultrasound images. Based on the two registered modalities, we conducted spatially and temporally more detailed quantitative strain comparison of the RF-based UME technique and tagged MRI. From the experimental results, we conclude that qualitatively the two modalities share similar overall trends. But error and variations in UME accumulate over time. Quantitatively tMRI is more robust and accurate than UME.

[1]  Jonathan Chan,et al.  Comparison of two-dimensional speckle and tissue velocity based strain and validation with harmonic phase magnetic resonance imaging. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2005, 8th International Conference, Palm Springs, CA, USA, October 26-29, 2005, Proceedings, Part I , 2005, MICCAI.

[3]  A. Montillo,et al.  Use of Bandpass Gabor Filters for Enhancing Blood-Myocardium Contrast and Filling-in tags in tagged MR Images , 2004 .

[4]  Richard D. White,et al.  P Cardiac Imaging easurement of Ventricular Torsion by Two-imensional Ultrasound Speckle Tracking Imaging , 2005 .

[5]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Extraction and Tracking of MRI Tagging Sheets Using a 3D Gabor Filter Bank , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  Elisa E. Konofagou,et al.  Validation of myocardial elastography using MR tagging in normal and abnormal human hearts in vivo , 2007, 2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[7]  Patrick Clarysse,et al.  A review of cardiac image registration methods , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Rigid registration of 3-D ultrasound with MR images: a new approach combining intensity and gradient information , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  David Rubin,et al.  Introduction to Continuum Mechanics , 2009 .

[10]  Jonas Crosby,et al.  New Noninvasive Method for Assessment of Left Ventricular Rotation: Speckle Tracking Echocardiography , 2005, Circulation.

[11]  Jing Ren,et al.  Dynamic 3D Ultrasound and MR Image Registration of the Beating Heart , 2005, MICCAI.

[12]  Wei-Ning Lee,et al.  P1A-5 Analysis of 3D Motion Effects in Myocardial Elastography , 2006, 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[13]  J. Ophir,et al.  Myocardial elastography--a feasibility study in vivo. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  F. Kallel,et al.  A Least-Squares Strain Estimator for Elastography , 1997, Ultrasonic imaging.

[15]  Jing Ren,et al.  Dynamic 2D Ultrasound and 3D CT Image Registration of the Beating Heart , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.