Argentina: Macroeconomic Crisis and Household Vulnerability

Using urban household surveys, we constructed a panel dataset to study the effects of the Argentine macroeconomic crisis of 1999-2002 with the aim of (1) identifying the most vulnerable households, (2) investigating whether employment in the public sector and government spending served to decrease vulnerability, and (3) understanding the mechanisms used by households to smooth the effects of the crisis. Households whose heads were male, less educated, and employed in the construction sector were more vulnerable to the crisis, experiencing larger-than-average declines in income and higher dispersion. Households whose heads were employed in the public sector were more protected from the crisis, although higher public spending did not serve to decrease their vulnerability. A significant source of vulnerability was linked to changes in employment status, and we studied the determinants of the probability of being unemployed and of becoming unemployed. Last, we found that households were unable to perfectly smooth income shocks. Given these results, there is room for broadening social safety nets, particularly in the form of public works programs.

[1]  Paul Glewwe,et al.  Are some groups more vulnerable to macroeconomic shocks than others , 1998 .

[2]  P. Agénor.  Macroeconomic Adjustment and the Poor: Analytical Issues and Cross-Country Evidence , 2002 .

[3]  Michael L. Mussa,et al.  Argentina and the Fund: From Triumph to Tragedy , 2002 .

[4]  Household behavior in the presence of economic crisis: evidence from Argentina, 2002 , 2003 .

[5]  D. McKenzie.  How do Households Cope with Aggregate Shocks? Evidence from the Mexican Peso Crisis , 2003 .

[6]  Stefan Dercon,et al.  Growth and shocks: evidence from rural Ethiopia , 2004 .

[7]  A. Thomas,et al.  Lessons from the Crisis in Argentina , 2005 .

[8]  Sergio L. Schmukler,et al.  Living and Dying with Hard Pegs: The Rise and Fall of Argentina's Currency Board , 2003 .

[9]  Petya Koeva,et al.  What Determines Individual Preferences over Reform? Microeconomic Evidence from Russia , 2002, IMF Staff Papers.

[10]  James P. Smith,et al.  California Center for Population Research On-Line Working Paper SeriesEconomic shocks, wealth and welfare , 2003 .

[11]  Ariel Fiszbein,et al.  The Argentine crisis and its impact on household welfare , 2003 .

[12]  G. Calvo,et al.  Sudden Stops, the Real Exchange Rate, and Fiscal Sustainability: Argentina's Lessons , 2002 .

[13]  Paul Glewwe,et al.  Poverty, Inequality, and Living Standards during Unorthodox Adjustment: The Case of Peru, 1985-1990 , 1994, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[14]  A. Velasco,et al.  The Argentine Collapse: Hard Money’s Soft Underbelly , 2002 .

[15]  Ariel Fiszbein,et al.  El impacto de la crisis argentina en el bienestar de los hogares , 2003 .

[16]  D. McKenzie.  Aggregate Shocks and Urban Labor Market Responses: Evidence from Argentina's Financial Crisis , 2004, Economic Development and Cultural Change.