WEEP: weight based energy efficient priority scheduling of data packets in mobile ad-hoc networks

In order to build a mobile ad hoc network, only some battery powered nodes are required to be deployed; no additional infrastructure is necessary. Routing, scheduling etc. algorithms for this kind of networks have to be designed in such a manner that battery power in nodes can be saved, that is, algorithms should be energy efficient. In most cases, an external priority is assigned to data packets which we have to take care. Along with that, in WEEP, we consider residual lifetime of source and destination nodes to estimate whether the current packet can be sent to destination. Moreover, if possibility of completion of a communication session is less, then more weight is given to data packets belonging to those sessions. The present article aims at reducing the number of route discovery sessions through energy efficient scheduling policy. Therefore, packets travelling through paths consisting of delicate links, are blessed with more priority than those travelling through strong wireless links. Simulation results show that performance improvement produced by WEEP is very significant compared to other protocols used to scheduling in ad hoc networks. As far as the authors know, WEEP is a unique scheduling algorithm in ad hoc network that considers expected residual lifetime of destination along with performance and fragility of a path.

[1]  Paramartha Dutta,et al.  Survey of Various Real and Non-real-time Scheduling Algorithms in Mobile Ad hoc Networks , 2018 .

[2]  C Annadurai Review of Packet Scheduling Algorithms in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2011 .

[3]  J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves,et al.  An efficient routing protocol for wireless networks , 1996, Mob. Networks Appl..

[4]  S. Senthil Kumar,et al.  Efficient Bandwidth Allocation for Packet Scheduling , 2012 .

[5]  Mario Gerla,et al.  Global state routing: a new routing scheme for ad-hoc wireless networks , 1998, ICC '98. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Record. Affiliated with SUPERCOMM'98 (Cat. No.98CH36220).

[6]  Ashema Hasti,et al.  Study of Impact of Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and its Future Applications , 2011 .

[7]  Paramartha Dutta,et al.  Fuzzy-Controlled Scheduling of Route-Request Packets (FSRR) in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2019, ArXiv.

[8]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing , 1999, Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

[9]  Sunil Taneja,et al.  A Survey of Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2010 .

[10]  Eytan Modiano Scheduling packet transmissions in a multi-hop packet switched network based on message length , 1997, Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks.

[11]  Chai-Keong Toh,et al.  Associativity-Based Routing for Ad Hoc Mobile Networks , 1997, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[12]  Dharma P. Agrawal,et al.  Efficient message scheduling in ad hoc networks , 2000, 2000 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference. Conference Record (Cat. No.00TH8540).

[13]  Y. Jay Guo,et al.  Synchronisation Techniques for HIPERLAN , 1997, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[14]  Yogesh Rathi,et al.  A_AODV: A Modern Routing Algorithm for Mobile Ad-Hoc Network , 2015 .

[15]  Vishal Jain,et al.  FUZZY-PRoPHET: a novel routing protocol for opportunistic network , 2017 .