Instances and Category Structure in Intercategory Relationships

An experiment was performed to examine the role of category instances and category structure in the transfer of learning between categories. Two problems in learning of categories were presented using exemplars of categories that were individuals with specified demographic characteristics. One group received two problems in which the same individuals were used as exemplars in both problems. The categories in both problems partitioned the exemplars in the same way, such that learning of the first problem could be transferred to the second problem by learning the correspondence. A second group received two problems which did not overlap on specific exemplars, but the second problem categorization rule preserved the attribute-value structure of the first problem. A third group received two problems which overlapped completely on specific exemplars, but in which there was no correspondence between problems in the way the rule partitioned the set. Performance on the second problem showed different patterns for the three groups. Results suggest that intercategory relationships are mediated in part by some exemplar-based representation and in part by structural similarity.

[1]  L. A. Goodman The Multivariate Analysis of Qualitative Data: Interactions among Multiple Classifications , 1970 .

[2]  B. Ross,et al.  Reminding-based category learning , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  R. Nosofsky Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. , 1984 .

[4]  S. Geisser,et al.  An Extension of Box's Results on the Use of the $F$ Distribution in Multivariate Analysis , 1958 .

[5]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Context theory of classification learning. , 1978 .

[6]  David E. Oeschger,et al.  Cognitive strategies, field dependence, and the abstraction process , 1979 .

[7]  J. Mauchly Significance Test for Sphericity of a Normal $n$-Variate Distribution , 1940 .

[8]  D. Robbins,et al.  Role of distinctive features in the abstraction of related concepts. , 1975 .

[9]  D L Medin,et al.  Evaluation of exemplar-based generalization and the abstraction of categorical information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  A. Vandierendonck,et al.  A parallel rule activation and rule synthesis model for generalization in category learning , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  E. Heit Categorization using chains of examples , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  R. Nosofsky American Psychological Association, Inc. Choice, Similarity, and the Context Theory of Classification , 2022 .

[13]  Lee R. Brooks,et al.  After the learning is over: factors controlling the selective application of general and particular knowledge , 1994 .

[14]  Stimulus memory and contextual cues in the abstraction process. , 1977 .

[15]  Mark W. Altom,et al.  Given versus induced category representations: use of prototype and exemplar information in classification. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Irwin D. Nahinsky,et al.  The Influence of Specific Stimulus Information on the Concept Learning Process. , 1975 .