Parameter and rating curve uncertainty propagation analysis of the SWAT model for two small Mediterranean catchments

Abstract The SWAT model was tested to simulate the streamflow of two small Mediterranean catchments (the Vène and the Pallas) in southern France. Model calibration and prediction uncertainty were assessed simultaneously by using three different techniques (SUFI-2, GLUE and ParaSol). Initially, a sensitivity analysis was conducted using the LH-OAT method. Subsequent sensitive parameter calibration and SWAT prediction uncertainty were analysed by considering, firstly, deterministic discharge data (assuming no uncertainty in discharge data) and secondly, uncertainty in discharge data through the development of a methodology that accounts explicitly for error in the rating curve (the stage−discharge relationship). To efficiently compare the different uncertainty methods and the effect of the uncertainty of the rating curve on model prediction uncertainty, common criteria were set for the likelihood function, the threshold value and the number of simulations. The results show that model prediction uncertainty is not only case-study specific, but also depends on the selected uncertainty analysis technique. It was also found that the 95% model prediction uncertainty interval is wider and more successful at encompassing the observations when uncertainty in the discharge data is considered explicitly. The latter source of uncertainty adds additional uncertainty to the total model prediction uncertainty. Editor D. Koutsoyiannis; Associate editor D. Gerten Citation Sellami, H., La Jeunesse, I., Benabdallah, S., and Vanclooster, M., 2013. Parameter and rating curve uncertainty propagation analysis of the SWAT model for two small Mediterranean watersheds. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58 (8), 1635−1657.

[1]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[2]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[3]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[4]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 1992 .

[5]  K. Beven,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Uncertainty in Runoff Prediction and the Value of Data: An Application of the GLUE Approach , 1996 .

[6]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[7]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information , 1998 .

[8]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[9]  Stephen R. Workman,et al.  SIMULATION OF DAILY AND MONTHLY STREAM DISCHARGE FROM SMALL WATERSHEDS USING THE SWAT MODEL , 2000 .

[10]  Eduardo Mario Mendiondo,et al.  Uncertainties in mean discharges from two large South American rivers due to rating curve variability , 2000 .

[11]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[12]  Keith Beven,et al.  Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology , 2001 .

[13]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  A Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters , 2002 .

[14]  Stephen R. Workman,et al.  STATISTICAL PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATING DAILY AND MONTHLY HYDROLOGIC MODEL PREDICTIONS , 2004 .

[15]  J. McDonnell,et al.  Constraining dynamic TOPMODEL responses for imprecise water table information using fuzzy rule based performance measures , 2004 .

[16]  K. Abbaspour,et al.  Estimating Uncertain Flow and Transport Parameters Using a Sequential Uncertainty Fitting Procedure , 2004 .

[17]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  An evaluation of the impact of model structure on hydrological modelling uncertainty for streamflow simulation , 2004 .

[18]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  Towards the characterization of streamflow simulation uncertainty through multimodel ensembles , 2004 .

[19]  Hans-Georg Frede,et al.  Automatic model calibration , 2005 .

[20]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Multi-Model Combination Techniques for Hydrological Forecasting: Application to Distributed Model Intercomparison Project Results , 2005 .

[21]  A. Petersen-Øverleir,et al.  Objective segmentation in compound rating curves , 2005 .

[22]  Misgana K. Muleta,et al.  Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model , 2005 .

[23]  Clyde L. Munster,et al.  MODELING EFFECTS OF BRUSH MANAGEMENT ON THE RANGELAND WATER BUDGET: EDWARDS PLATEAU, TEXAS 1 , 2005 .

[24]  C. Diks,et al.  Improved treatment of uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Combining the strengths of global optimization and data assimilation , 2005 .

[25]  Alberto Montanari,et al.  Large sample behaviors of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) in assessing the uncertainty of rainfall‐runoff simulations , 2005 .

[26]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Multimodel Combination Techniques for Analysis of Hydrological Simulations: Application to Distributed Model Intercomparison Project Results , 2006 .

[27]  J. M. Zaldívar,et al.  Modelling water discharges and nitrogen inputs into a Mediterranean lagoon: Impact on the primary production , 2006 .

[28]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Uncertainty assessment of integrated distributed hydrological models using GLUE with Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling , 2006 .

[29]  Yakov A. Pachepsky,et al.  Modeling bacteria fate and transport in watersheds to support TMDLs , 2006 .

[30]  M. Cannarozzo,et al.  Influence of rating curve uncertainty on daily rainfall–runoff model predictions. , 2006 .

[31]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models , 2006 .

[32]  Predictions in ungauged basins : promise and progress , 2006 .

[33]  K. C. Abbaspour,et al.  Calibration and uncertainty issues of a hydrological model (SWAT) applied to West Africa , 2006 .

[34]  Keith Beven,et al.  A manifesto for the equifinality thesis , 2006 .

[35]  Qingyun Duan,et al.  An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction , 2006 .

[36]  Thomas Meixner,et al.  A global and efficient multi-objective auto-calibration and uncertainty estimation method for water quality catchment models , 2007 .

[37]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions , 2007 .

[38]  Bruce A. Robinson,et al.  Treatment of uncertainty using ensemble methods: Comparison of sequential data assimilation and Bayesian model averaging , 2007 .

[39]  Mazdak Arabi,et al.  A probabilistic approach for analysis of uncertainty in the evaluation of watershed management practices , 2007 .

[40]  K. Abbaspour,et al.  Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT , 2007 .

[41]  Jing Yang,et al.  Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China , 2008 .

[42]  P. Chapman,et al.  Investigating hydrological regimes and processes in a set of catchments with temporary waters in Mediterranean Europe , 2008 .

[43]  Kuniyoshi Takeuchi,et al.  Regionalisation of hydrological model parameters under parameter uncertainty : A case study involving TOPMODEL and basins across the globe , 2008 .

[44]  Hong Yang,et al.  Water availability, demand and reliability of in situ water harvesting in smallholder rain-fed agriculture in the Thukela River Basin, South Africa , 2009 .

[45]  M. Tournoud,et al.  Hydrological processes controlling flow generation in a small Mediterranean catchment under karstic influence , 2009 .

[46]  G. La Loggia,et al.  Daily streamflow prediction with uncertainty in ephemeral catchments using the GLUE methodology , 2009 .

[47]  Claire Baffaut,et al.  Modeling Flow and Pollutant Transport in a Karst Watershed with SWAT , 2009 .

[48]  Assefa M. Melesse,et al.  SWAT model application and prediction uncertainty analysis in the Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia , 2009 .

[49]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Parameter and modeling uncertainty simulated by GLUE and a formal Bayesian method for a conceptual hydrological model , 2010 .

[50]  Gabriele Freni,et al.  Bayesian approach for uncertainty quantification in water quality modelling: The influence of prior distribution , 2010 .

[51]  Florian Pappenberger,et al.  Impacts of uncertain river flow data on rainfall‐runoff model calibration and discharge predictions , 2010 .

[52]  V. Singh,et al.  Evaluation of the subjective factors of the GLUE method and comparison with the formal Bayesian method in uncertainty assessment of hydrological models , 2010 .

[53]  Lei Chen,et al.  Analysis of parameter uncertainty in hydrological and sediment modeling using GLUE method: a case study of SWAT model applied to Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China , 2011 .

[54]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009 , 2011 .

[55]  Nanée Chahinian,et al.  Flow and nutrient transport in intermittent rivers: a modelling case-study on the Vène River using SWAT 2005 , 2011 .

[56]  Qian Hong,et al.  Parameter uncertainty analysis in watershed total phosphorus modeling using the GLUE methodology , 2011 .