Sutures versus staplers for skin closure of midline incision in laparotomy patients and their outcome

Aim of the study is to compare the clinical outcome of staplers versus skin sutures in skin closure of midline incision in laparotomy patients in term of superficial surgical site of infection, pain, wound dehiscence, time of skin closure and cosmetic satisfaction and thus verify the authenticity of previous studies. Though many studies have shown the superiority of staples for speed of closure, it is unclear if staples give a superior cosmetic result or reduce pain. Several studies show that sutures are superior for cosmoses and that they decrease post-operative pain and are more cost effective. So cost of procedure should also be considered. Closure should serve both functions and aesthetic purposes. Aesthetically poor scar can have a negative impact on overall quality of life causing considerable distress and unhappiness. Precaution of would infection is also necessary as it may lead not only an ugly scar but also occurrence and recurrence of hernia. In our study we found.

[1]  A. Bayat,et al.  Skin scar preconceptions must be challenged: importance of self-perception in skin scarring. , 2010, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[2]  H. Stöltzing,et al.  Current practice of abdominal wall closure in elective surgery – Is there any consensus? , 2009, BMC surgery.

[3]  A Bayat,et al.  The hidden cost of skin scars: quality of life after skin scarring. , 2008, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[4]  F. Gottrup An overview of surgical site infections: aetiology, incidence and risk factors , 2005 .

[5]  J E Hollander,et al.  Laceration management. , 1999, Annals of emergency medicine.

[6]  M. Nicholson,et al.  Randomised trial of subcuticular suture versus metal clips for wound closure after thyroid and parathyroid surgery. , 1997, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[7]  J. Kanegaye,et al.  Comparison of skin stapling devices and standard sutures for pediatric scalp lacerations: a randomized study of cost and time benefits. , 1997, The Journal of pediatrics.

[8]  C. Cernea,et al.  Prospective study using skin staplers in head and neck surgery. , 1995, American journal of surgery.

[9]  R. Goldberg,et al.  Cost analysis of stapling versus suturing for skin closure. , 1995, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[10]  C. Ranaboldo,et al.  Closure of Iaparotomy wounds: skin staples versus sutures , 1992 .

[11]  P. de Ruiter,et al.  Subcuticular, continuous and mechanical skin closure: cosmetic results of a prospective randomized trial. , 1989, The Netherlands journal of surgery.

[12]  C. Harvey,et al.  A prospective trial of skin staples and sutures in skin closure , 1986, Irish journal of medical science.

[13]  D. Lubowski,et al.  Abdominal wound closure comparing the proximate stapler with sutures. , 2008, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.

[14]  C. Quick,et al.  Staples for wound closure: a controlled trial. , 1985, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[15]  M. Evans,et al.  Two methods of skin closure in abdominal operations: A controlled clinical trial , 1983, The British journal of surgery.

[16]  K. Cilliers,et al.  A comparison of a disposable skin stapler and nylon sutures for wound closure. , 1982, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[17]  U. Wied,et al.  Randomised trial comparing Proximate stapler with conventional skin closure. , 1981, Acta chirurgica Scandinavica.

[18]  D. Boyd,et al.  Davis-Christopher textbook of surgery : the biological basis of modern surgical practice , 1974 .