A nurse-coordinated intervention for primary care patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

AbstractOBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of a nurse-coordinated intervention delivered to patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus between office visits to primary care physicians. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Veterans Affairs general medical clinic. PATIENTS: 275 veterans who had NIDDM and were receiving primary care from general internists. INTERVENTION: Nurse-initiated contacts were made by telephone at least monthly to provide patient education (with special emphasis on regimens and significant signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia), reinforce compliance with regimens, monitor patients’ health status, facilitate resolution of identified problems, and facilitate access to primary care. MEASUREMENTS: Glycemic control was assessed using glycosylated hemoglobin (GHb) and fasting blood sugar (FBS) levels. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was measured with the Medical Outcomes Study SF-36, and diabetes-related symptoms were assessed using patients’ self-reports of signs and symptoms of hyper- and hypoglycemia during the previous month. MAIN RESULTS: At one year, between-group differences favored intervention patients for FBS (174.1 mg/dL vs 193.1 mg/dL, p=0.011) and GHb (10.5% vs 11.1%, p=0.046). Statistically significant differences were not observed for either SF-36 scores (p=0.66) or diabetes-related symptoms (p=0.23). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention, designed to be a pragmatic, low-intensity adjunct to care delivered by physicians, modestly improved glycemic control but not HRQOL or diabetes-related symptoms.

[1]  A. Feinstein,et al.  The importance of classifying initial co-morbidity in evaluating the outcome of diabetes mellitus. , 1974, Journal of chronic diseases.

[2]  Ware J.E.Jr.,et al.  THE MOS 36- ITEM SHORT FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF- 36) CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND ITEM SELECTION , 1992 .

[3]  A. Stewart,et al.  Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. , 1989, JAMA.

[4]  J. Wasson,et al.  Telephone care as a substitute for routine clinic follow-up. , 1992, JAMA.

[5]  Sherrie H. Kaplan,et al.  Patients’ participation in medical care , 1988, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[6]  M. Weinberger,et al.  Economic impact of diabetes mellitus in the elderly. , 1990, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[7]  R. Rubin,et al.  Effect of Diabetes Education on Self-Care, Metabolic Control, and Emotional Well-Being , 1989, Diabetes Care.

[8]  C. Safran,et al.  Interventions to Prevent Readmission: The Constraints of Cost and Efficacy , 1989, Medical care.

[9]  G A Colditz,et al.  The economic costs of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. , 1989, JAMA.

[10]  J. Hanlon,et al.  An Evaluation of a Brief Health Status Measure in Elderly Veterans , 1991, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[11]  E. DeLong,et al.  Impact of Glucose Self-Monitoring on Non-lnsulin-Treated Patients With Type II Diabetes Mellitus: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Blood and Urine Testing , 1990, Diabetes Care.

[12]  C. McHorney,et al.  The MOS 36‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey (SF‐36): II. Psychometric and Clinical Tests of Validity in Measuring Physical and Mental Health Constructs , 1993, Medical care.

[13]  S. Genuth,et al.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  R. Recker,et al.  A Randomized Study of the Effects of a Home Diabetes Education Program , 1986, Diabetes Care.

[15]  David M. Smith,et al.  A controlled trial to increase office visits and reduce hospitalizations of diabetic patients , 1987, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[16]  Increasing Prescribed Office Visits: A Controlled Trial in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus , 1986, Medical care.

[17]  Dawn K. Wilson,et al.  Effects of diet and exercise interventions on control and quality of life in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus , 1987, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[18]  N. Fineberg,et al.  The diabetes education study , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[19]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[20]  A. Krosnick Economic impact of type II diabetes mellitus. , 1988, Primary care.

[21]  R. Lasker,et al.  The diabetes control and complications trial. Implications for policy and practice. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  M. Weinberger,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of increased telephone contact for patients with osteoarthritis. A randomized, controlled trial. , 1993, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[23]  W. Tierney,et al.  Can the provision of information to patients with osteoarthritis improve functional status? A randomized, controlled trial. , 1989, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[24]  S. Mazzuca,et al.  Does patient education in chronic disease have therapeutic value? , 1982, Journal of chronic diseases.

[25]  E. Ford,et al.  Trends in Diabetes and Diabetic Complications, 1980–1987 , 1992, Diabetes Care.

[26]  C. Mulrow,et al.  Evaluation of an audiovisual diabetes education program , 1987, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[27]  W. Karmally,et al.  Randomized, Controlled Trial of Diabetic Patient Education: Improved Knowledge Without Improved Metabolic Status , 1987, Diabetes Care.

[28]  S H Kaplan,et al.  Patients' participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. , 1988, Journal of general internal medicine.

[29]  J E Ware,et al.  Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. , 1983, Evaluation and program planning.