Computing Nash Equilibria of Action-Graph Games

This talk will survey two graphical models which the authors have proposed for compactly representing single-shot, finite-action games in which a large number of agents contend for scarce resources. The first model considered is Local-Effect Games (LEGs). These games often (but not always) have pure-strategy Nash equilibria. Finding a potential function is a good technique for finding such equilibria. We give a complete characterization of which LEGs have potential functions and provide the functions in each case; we also show a general case where pure-strategy equilibria exist in the absence of potential functions. Action-graph games (AGGs) are a fully expressive game representation which can compactly express both strict and context-specific independence between players' utility functions, and which generalize LEGs. We present algorithms for computing both symmetric and arbitrary equilibria of AGGs, based on a continuation method proposed by Govindan and Wilson. We analyze the worst- case cost of computing the Jacobian of the payoff function, the exponential- time bottleneck step of this algorithm, and in all cases achieve exponential speedup. When the indegree of G is bounded by a constant and the game is symmetric, the Jacobian can be computed in polynomial time.

[1]  Eric van Damme,et al.  Non-Cooperative Games , 2000 .

[2]  J. Mertens,et al.  ON THE STRATEGIC STABILITY OF EQUILIBRIA , 1986 .

[3]  Yishay Mansour,et al.  Efficient Nash Computation in Large Population Games with Bounded Influence , 2002, UAI.

[4]  Pierfrancesco La Mura Game Networks , 2000, UAI.

[5]  Robert Wilson,et al.  A global Newton method to compute Nash equilibria , 2003, J. Econ. Theory.

[6]  L. Shapley,et al.  Potential Games , 1994 .

[7]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Local-Effect Games , 2003, IJCAI.

[8]  Michael L. Littman,et al.  Graphical Models for Game Theory , 2001, UAI.

[9]  Paul Klingsberg,et al.  A Gray Code for Compositions , 1982, J. Algorithms.

[10]  Daphne Koller,et al.  Multi-agent algorithms for solving graphical games , 2002, AAAI/IAAI.

[11]  T. C. Hu,et al.  Combinatorial algorithms , 1982 .

[12]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Algorithms, Games, and the Internet , 2001, ICALP.

[13]  Robert Wilson,et al.  Computing Nash equilibria by iterated polymatrix approximation , 2004 .

[14]  J. Nash Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games. , 1950, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Daphne Koller,et al.  Multi-Agent Influence Diagrams for Representing and Solving Games , 2001, IJCAI.

[16]  Daphne Koller,et al.  A Continuation Method for Nash Equilibria in Structured Games , 2003, IJCAI.

[17]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Bounding the inefficiency of equilibria in nonatomic congestion games , 2004, Games Econ. Behav..

[18]  R. Rosenthal A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria , 1973 .

[19]  R. McKelvey,et al.  Computation of equilibria in finite games , 1996 .