Analysis of genetic interactions on a genome-wide scale in budding yeast: diploid-based synthetic lethality analysis by microarray.

Comprehensive collections of open reading frame (ORF) deletion mutant strains exist for the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. With great prescience, these strains were designed with short molecular bar codes or TAGs that uniquely mark each deletion allele, flanked by shared priming sequences. These features have enabled researchers to handle yeast mutant collections as complex pools of approximately 6000 strains. The presence of any individual mutant within a pool can be assessed indirectly by measuring the relative abundance of its corresponding TAG(s) in genomic DNA prepared from the pool. This is readily accomplished by wholesale polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the TAGs using fluorescent oligonucleotide primers that recognize the common flanking sequences, followed by hybridization of the labeled PCR products to a TAG oligonucleotide microarray. Here we describe a method-diploid-based synthetic lethality analysis by microarray (dSLAM)-whereby such pools can be manipulated to rapidly construct and assess the fitness of 6000 double-mutant strains in a single experiment. Analysis of double-mutant strains is of growing importance in defining the spectrum of essential cellular functionalities and in understanding how these functionalities interrelate.

[1]  B. Birren,et al.  Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements , 2003, Nature.

[2]  Ping Ye,et al.  Commensurate distances and similar motifs in genetic congruence and protein interaction networks in yeast , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[3]  F. Winston,et al.  A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli. , 1987, Gene.

[4]  J. Boeke,et al.  A DNA Microarray-Based Genetic Screen for Nonhomologous End-Joining Mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2001, Science.

[5]  B. Barrell,et al.  Life with 6000 Genes , 1996, Science.

[6]  Rafael A. Irizarry,et al.  Improved statistical analysis of budding yeast TAG microarrays revealed by defined spike-in pools , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  Jef D Boeke,et al.  dSLAM analysis of genome-wide genetic interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2007, Methods.

[8]  J. Mccusker,et al.  Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1999, Yeast.

[9]  A. Goffeau,et al.  The uses of genome-wide yeast mutant collections , 2004, Genome Biology.

[10]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2002, Nature.

[11]  Rafael A. Irizarry,et al.  Improved microarray methods for profiling the yeast knockout strain collection , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  Nader Pourmand,et al.  Characterization of synthetic DNA bar codes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene-deletion strains. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Q. Zeng,et al.  Systematic discovery of new genes in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. , 2003, Genome research.

[14]  A. Tong,et al.  Synthetic genetic array analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2006, Methods in molecular biology.

[15]  J. Bader,et al.  A robust toolkit for functional profiling of the yeast genome. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[16]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  Exploration of the Function and Organization of the Yeast Early Secretory Pathway through an Epistatic Miniarray Profile , 2005, Cell.

[17]  Brian D. Peyser,et al.  Statistical analysis of fitness data determined by TAG hybridization on microarrays. , 2008, Methods in molecular biology.

[18]  Kelvin Xi Zhang,et al.  Pandora, a PAthway and Network DiscOveRy Approach based on common biological evidence , 2009, Bioinform..

[19]  Jef D Boeke,et al.  Functional genomics of genes with small open reading frames (sORFs) in S. cerevisiae. , 2006, Genome research.

[20]  B. Dujon,et al.  The complete DNA sequence of yeast chromosome III , 1992, Nature.

[21]  T. Ideker,et al.  Comprehensive curation and analysis of global interaction networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Journal of biology.

[22]  Brian D. Peyser,et al.  Gene function prediction from congruent synthetic lethal interactions in yeast , 2005, Molecular systems biology.

[23]  P. Philippsen,et al.  New heterologous modules for classical or PCR‐based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1994, Yeast.

[24]  Jonathan Pevsner,et al.  Bioinformatics and functional genomics , 2003 .

[25]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic Genetic Analysis with Ordered Arrays of Yeast Deletion Mutants , 2001, Science.

[26]  Rafael A Irizarry,et al.  Global synthetic-lethality analysis and yeast functional profiling. , 2006, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[27]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. , 1999, Science.

[28]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Global Mapping of the Yeast Genetic Interaction Network , 2004, Science.

[29]  G. Natsoulis,et al.  5-Fluoroorotic acid as a selective agent in yeast molecular genetics. , 1987, Methods in enzymology.

[30]  David Collingwood,et al.  Genomic mapping of single-stranded DNA in hydroxyurea-challenged yeasts identifies origins of replication , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[31]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Effects of atmospheric ozone on microarray data quality. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[32]  Sourav Chatterji,et al.  Prediction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication origins , 2004, Genome Biology.