Detonation cell size model based on deep neural network for hydrogen, methane and propane mixtures with air and oxygen

Abstract The aim of the present study was to develop model for detonation cell sizes prediction based on a deep artificial neural network of hydrogen, methane and propane mixtures with air and oxygen. The discussion about the currently available algorithms compared existing solutions and resulted in a conclusion that there is a need for a new model, free from uncertainty of the effective activation energy and the reaction length definitions. The model offers a better and more feasible alternative to the existing ones. Resulting predictions were validated against experimental data obtained during the investigation of detonation parameters, as well as with data collected from the literature. Additionally, separate models for individual mixtures were created and compared with the main model. The comparison showed no drawbacks caused by fitting one model to many mixtures. Moreover, it was demonstrated that the model may be easily extended by including more independent variables. As an example, dependency on pressure was examined. The preparation of experimental data for deep neural network training was described in detail to allow reproducing the results obtained and extending the model to different mixtures and initial conditions. The source code of ready to use models is also provided.

[1]  Christopher W. Wilson,et al.  The use of ignition delay time in genetic algorithms optimisation of chemical kinetics reaction mechanisms , 2005, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[2]  R. Knystautas,et al.  Measurement of Cell Size in Hydrocarbon-air Mixtures and Predictions of Critical Tube Diameter, Critical Initiation Energy and Detonability Limits , 1984 .

[3]  Mohammad Rahgoshay,et al.  Investigation of a Hydrogen Mitigation System During Large Break Loss-Of-Coolant Accident for a Two-Loop Pressurized Water Reactor , 2016 .

[4]  Zhi Shang,et al.  Application of artificial intelligence CFD based on neural network in vapor-water two-phase flow , 2005, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[5]  S. Dorofeev,et al.  Deflagration to detonation transition in large confined volume of lean hydrogen-air mixtures , 1996 .

[6]  Andrzej Teodorczyk,et al.  Propagation mechanism of quasi-detonations , 1989 .

[7]  M. Kendall Elementary Statistics , 1945, Nature.

[8]  Pablo H. Ibargüengoytia,et al.  Viscosity virtual sensor to control combustion in fossil fuel power plants , 2013, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[9]  L. Rodríguez-Aragón,et al.  Optimal designs for the Arrhenius equation , 2005 .

[10]  R. I. Soloukhin,et al.  Chemical Kinetics of Hydrogen-Air-Diluent Detonations , 1986 .

[11]  K. I. Shchelkin,et al.  Gasdynamics of combustion , 1965 .

[12]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[13]  A. A. Efimenko,et al.  A model for detonation cell size prediction from chemical kinetics , 2000 .

[14]  A G Venetsanos,et al.  Source, dispersion and combustion modelling of an accidental release of hydrogen in an urban environment. , 2003, Journal of hazardous materials.

[15]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks , 1991, Neural Networks.

[16]  Arthur E. Hoerl,et al.  Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal Problems , 2000, Technometrics.

[17]  E. S. Weiss,et al.  Methane–air detonation experiments at NIOSH Lake Lynn Laboratory , 2013 .

[18]  Prankul Middha,et al.  CFD calculations of gas leak dispersion and subsequent gas explosions: validation against ignited impinging hydrogen jet experiments. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[19]  Zhiqiang Fan,et al.  Experimental investigation of methane-oxygen detonation propagation in tubes , 2017 .

[20]  D. Goodwin,et al.  Cantera: An Object-oriented Software Toolkit for Chemical Kinetics, Thermodynamics, and Transport Processes. Version 2.2.0 , 2015 .

[21]  S. Tieszen,et al.  The influence of initial pressure and temperature on hydrogen-air-diluent detonations , 1991 .

[22]  Tamás Varga,et al.  Comparison of the performance of several recent hydrogen combustion mechanisms , 2014 .

[23]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Algorithms for Hyper-Parameter Optimization , 2011, NIPS.

[24]  Ali Elkamel,et al.  MODELING THE HYDROCRACKING PROCESS USING ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS , 1999 .

[25]  T. Jordan,et al.  Gas detonation cell width prediction model based on support vector regression , 2017 .

[26]  Browne,et al.  Cross-Validation Methods. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[27]  V V Molkov,et al.  Vented gaseous deflagrations modelling of hinged inertial vent covers. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[28]  Dmitriy Makarov,et al.  Numerical simulations of large-scale detonation tests in the RUT facility by the LES model. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[29]  A. Teodorczyk,et al.  Numerical and experimental investigation of methane-oxygen detonation in a 9 m long tube , 2016 .