Effects of Stereo Viewing Conditions on Distance Perception in Virtual Environments

Several studies from different research groups investigating perception of absolute, egocentric distances in virtual environments have reported a compression of the intended size of the virtual space. One potential explanation for the compression is that inaccuracies and cue conflicts involving stereo viewing conditions in head mounted displays result in an inaccurate absolute scaling of the virtual world. We manipulate stereo viewing conditions in a head mounted display and show the effects of using both measured and fixed inter-pupilary distances, as well as bi-ocular and monocular viewing of graphics, on absolute distance judgments. Our results indicate that the amount of compression of distance judgments is unaffected by these manipulations. The equivalent performance with stereo, bi-ocular, and monocular viewing suggests that the limitations on the presentation of stereo imagery that are inherent in head mounted displays are likely not the source of distance compression reported in previous virtual environment studies.

[1]  William B. Thompson,et al.  Visual Cues for Perceiving Distances from Objects to Surfaces , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[2]  Stephen R. Ellis,et al.  Judgments of the Distance to Nearby Virtual Objects: Interaction of Viewing Conditions and Accommodative Demand , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[3]  J. M. Foley.  Binocular distance perception. , 1980, Psychological review.

[4]  Mark Mon-Williams,et al.  Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments , 1995, Vision Research.

[5]  James P. Bliss,et al.  Distance Estimation in Virtual Environments , 1995 .

[6]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Throwing versus walking as indicators of distance perception in similar real and virtual environments , 2005, TAP.

[7]  Joshua Maclvor Knapp,et al.  The visual perception of egocentric distance in virtual environments , 2002 .

[8]  William Ribarsky,et al.  A Geometric Comparison of Algorithms for Fusion Control in Stereoscopic HTDs , 2002, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[9]  J M Loomis,et al.  Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Limited Field of View of Head-Mounted Displays Is Not the Cause of Distance Underestimation in Virtual Environments , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[11]  Bob G. Witmer,et al.  Judging Perceived and Traversed Distance in Virtual Environments , 1998, Presence.

[12]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Quantitative Evaluation of Perspective and Stereoscopic Displays in Three-Axis Manual Tracking Tasks , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  Bing Wu,et al.  Evidence for a sequential surface integration process hypothesis from judging egocentric distance with restricted view of the ground , 2010 .

[14]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  The effects of head-mounted display mechanics on distance judgments in virtual environments , 2004, APGV '04.

[15]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Chapter 3 – Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth* , 1995 .

[16]  David Drascic,et al.  Skill Acquisition and Task Performance in Teleoperation Using Monoscopic and Stereoscopic Video Remote Viewing , 1991 .

[17]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Perceived egocentric distances in real, image-based, and traditional virtual environments , 2002, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2002.

[18]  Harry L. Snyder,et al.  Comparison of depth cues for relative depth judgments , 1990, Other Conferences.

[19]  J. Thomson.  Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. , 2003 .

[21]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  The Influence of Restricted Viewing Conditions on Egocentric Distance Perception: Implications for Real and Virtual Indoor Environments , 2005, Perception.

[22]  Wallace J. Sadowski,et al.  Nonvisually Guided Locomotion to a Previously Viewed Target in Real and Virtual Environments , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[23]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Does the Quality of the Computer Graphics Matter when Judging Distances in Visually Immersive Environments? , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[24]  S S Fukusima,et al.  Visual perception of egocentric distance as assessed by triangulation. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  J. Loomis,et al.  Visual space perception and visually directed action. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Perceiving distance accurately by a directional process of integrating ground information , 2004, Nature.

[27]  G. Sperling,et al.  Tradeoffs between stereopsis and proximity luminance covariance as determinants of perceived 3D structure , 1986, Vision Research.

[28]  John P. Lewis,et al.  Perceptuomotor adaptation: more than meets the eye , 2002 .

[29]  J. Rieser,et al.  Visual Perception and the Guidance of Locomotion without Vision to Previously Seen Targets , 1990, Perception.

[30]  Warren Robinett,et al.  A Computational Model for the Stereoscopic Optics of a Head-Mounted Display , 1991, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[31]  Larry F. Hodges,et al.  The Perception of Distance in Simulated Visual Displays:A Comparison of the Effectiveness and Accuracy of Multiple Depth Cues Across Viewing Distances , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[32]  William F. Reinhart,et al.  Depth cueing for visual search and cursor positioning , 1991, Electronic Imaging.

[33]  W C GOGEL,et al.  Convergence as a cue to the perceived distance of objects in a binocular configuration. , 1961, Report. Army Medical Research Laboratory.

[34]  Paul Milgram,et al.  Perceptual issues in augmented reality , 1996, Electronic Imaging.

[35]  Paul Milgram,et al.  Perceptual Effects in Aligning Virtual and Real Objects in Augmented Reality Displays , 1997 .

[36]  G P Bingham,et al.  Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: a comparison of actual versus virtual environments. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Sarah S. Chance,et al.  Spatial Updating of Self-Position and Orientation During Real, Imagined, and Virtual Locomotion , 1998 .

[38]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Absolute motion parallax weakly determines visual scale in real and virtual environments , 1995, Electronic Imaging.