On the Performance of Combined Quadrature Amplitude Modulation and Convolutional Codes for Cross-Coupled Multidimensional Channels

The performance of cross-coupled, M -ary quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) systems is determined when bandwidth efficient trellis codes are used to combat interference. Performance with and without compensation for cross-coupled interference is presented. It is found that simple trellis codes can maintain the error probability at an acceptable level for cross-coupling parameters that render uncoded systems unusable. Up to two-dimensional trellis codes are considered for four-dimensional QAM signals, and possibilities of obtaining diversity advantages in the form of higher total system throughput by prolonged availability of the two signals are explored. This is accomplished through joint coding over two different constellations. The probability of the most likely error events is calculated by using the method of moments. The results are applicable to any digital communication system using multidimensional quadrature amplitude modulation, e.g., voiceband modems, cross-polarized radio systems and, to some extent, optical systems. In the paper the analysis is restricted to nondispersive cross-coupling models. In most cases the coding gain is larger than in the absence of cross-coupling interference. Specifically, it is found that simple codes have coding gains increased by at least 2 dB with cross-coupling interference relative to that obtained on the additive white Gaussian noise channel.

[1]  Won Lee,et al.  A Maximum-Likelihood Sequence Estimator with Decision-Feedback Equalization , 1977, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[2]  Gottfried Ungerboeck,et al.  Channel coding with multilevel/phase signals , 1982, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[3]  V. Prabhu,et al.  Error-Rate Considerations for Digital Phase-Modulation Systems , 1969 .

[4]  J. Bibb Cain,et al.  Error-Correction Coding for Digital Communications , 1981 .

[5]  Peter J. McLane A residual intersymbol interference error bound for truncated-state Viterbi detectors , 1980, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[6]  Allen Gersho,et al.  Multidimensional Signal Constellations for Voiceband Data Transmission , 1984, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[7]  G. David Forney,et al.  Efficient Modulation for Band-Limited Channels , 1984, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[8]  Lee-Fang Wei Rotationally Invariant Convolutional Channel Coding with Expanded Signal Space-Part I: 180° , 1984, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[9]  Hemant K. Thapar Real-Time Application of Trellis Coding to High-Speed Voiceband Data Transmission , 1984, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[10]  A. R. Calderbank,et al.  Four-dimensional modulation with an eight-state trellis code , 1985, AT&T Technical Journal.

[11]  Stephen G. Wilson,et al.  Four-Dimensional Modulation and Coding: An Alternative to Frequency-Reuse , 1984, ICC.

[12]  V. K. Prabhu,et al.  Some considerations of error bounds in digital systems , 1971 .

[13]  M. Kavehrad,et al.  Performance of cross-polarized M-ary QAM signals over nondispersive fading channels , 1984, AT&T Bell Laboratories Technical Journal.

[14]  Marco Ajmone Marsan,et al.  Combined coding and modulation: Theory and applications , 1988, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[15]  M. Kavehrad Performance of nondiversity receivers for spread spectrum in indoor wireless communications , 1985, AT&T Technical Journal.