The Wave-Matching Boundary Integral Equation — An energy approach to Galerkin BEM for acoustic wave propagation problems

In this paper, a new Boundary Integral Equation (BIE) is proposed for solution of the scalar Helmholtz equation. Applications include acoustic scattering problems, as occur in room acoustics and outdoor and underwater sound propagation. It draws together ideas from the study of time-harmonic and transient BIEs and spatial audio sensing and rendering, to produce an energy-inspired Galerkin BEM that is intended for use with oscillatory basis functions. Pivotal is the idea that waves at a boundary may be decomposed into incoming and outgoing components. When written in its admittance form, it can be thought of setting the Burton–Miller coupling parameter differently for each basis function based on its oscillation; this is a discrete form of the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map. It is also naturally expressed in a reflectance form, which can be solved by matrix inversion or by marching on in reflection order. Consideration of this leads to an orthogonality relation between the incoming and outgoing waves, which makes the scheme immune to interior cavity eigenmodes. Moreover, the scheme is seen to have two remarkable properties when solution is performed over an entire obstacle: (i) it has a condition number of 1 for all positive-real wavenumber k on any closed geometry when a specific choice of cylindrical basis functions are used; (ii) when modelling two domains separated by a barrier domain, the two problems are numerical uncoupled when plane wave basis functions are used — this is the case in reality but is not achieved by any other BIE representation that the authors are aware of. Normalisation and envelope functions, as would be required to build a Partition-of-Unity or Hybrid-Numerical-Asymptotic scheme, are introduced and the above properties are seen to become approximate. The modified scheme is applied successfully to a cylinder test case: accuracy of the solution is maintained and the BIE is still immune to interior cavity eigenmodes, gives similar conditioning to the Burton–Miller method and iterative solution is stable. It is seen that for this test case themajority of values in the interaction matrices are extremely small and may be set to zero without affecting ∗ Corresponding author. E-mail address: j.a.hargreaves@salford.ac.uk (J.A. Hargreaves). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wavemoti.2018.07.003 0165-2125/© 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). J.A. Hargreaves and Y.W. Lam / Wave Motion 87 (2019) 4–36 5 conditioning or accuracy, thus the linear system become sparse a property uncommon in BEM formulations. ©2018 TheAuthors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CCBY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

[1]  H. A. Schenck Improved Integral Formulation for Acoustic Radiation Problems , 1968 .

[2]  G. F. Miller,et al.  The application of integral equation methods to the numerical solution of some exterior boundary-value problems , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[3]  T. Terai On calculation of sound fields around three dimensional objects by integral equation methods , 1980 .

[4]  G. Weinreich,et al.  Method for measuring acoustic radiation fields , 1980 .

[5]  H. Saunders,et al.  Acoustics: An Introduction to Its Physical Principles and Applications , 1984 .

[6]  R. Kress Minimizing the condition number of boundary integral operators in acoustic and electromagnetic scattering , 1985 .

[7]  A. Taflove,et al.  A new formulation of electromagnetic wave scattering using an on-surface radiation boundary condition approach , 1987 .

[8]  M. Hamdi,et al.  A new boundary finite element method for fluid–structure interaction problems , 1987 .

[9]  M. Tamura Spatial Fourier transform method of measuring reflection coefficients at oblique incidence. I: Theory and numerical examples , 1990 .

[10]  S. Amini On the choice of the coupling parameter in boundary integral formulations of the exterior acoustic problem , 1990 .

[11]  L. Schmerr,et al.  Hypersingular Boundary Integral Equations: Some Applications in Acoustic and Elastic Wave Scattering , 1990 .

[12]  Y. Kawai,et al.  The application of integral equation methods to the calculation of sound attenuation by barriers , 1990 .

[13]  P. Harris,et al.  On the Burton and Miller Boundary Integral Formulation of the Exterior Acoustic Problem , 1992 .

[14]  S. Amini Boundary integral solution of the exterior Helmholtz problem , 1993, Computational Mechanics.

[15]  T. Cox The optimization of profiled diffusers , 1995 .

[16]  J. Oden,et al.  Application of hp-adaptive BE/FE methods to elastic scattering , 1996 .

[17]  U. Svensson,et al.  An analytic secondary source model of edge diffraction impulse responses , 1999 .

[18]  E. Michielssen,et al.  Analysis of transient wave scattering from rigid bodies using a Burton–Miller approach , 1999 .

[19]  E. Michielssen,et al.  Analysis of transient electromagnetic scattering from closed surfaces using a combined field integral equation , 2000 .

[20]  Masataka Tanaka,et al.  On non‐linear transformations for accurate numerical evaluation of weakly singular boundary integrals , 2001 .

[21]  Linda P. Franzoni,et al.  An acoustic boundary element method based on energy and intensity variables for prediction of high-frequency broadband sound fields , 2001 .

[22]  T. Ha-Duong,et al.  A Galerkin BEM for transient acoustic scattering by an absorbing obstacle , 2003 .

[23]  Daniel W. Lozier,et al.  NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions , 2003, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[24]  P. Bettess,et al.  Plane-wave basis finite elements and boundary elements for three-dimensional wave scattering , 2004, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[25]  Yiu W. Lam,et al.  Performance of profiled single noise barriers covered with quadratic residue diffusers , 2005 .

[26]  R. Duraiswami,et al.  Fast Multipole Methods for the Helmholtz Equation in Three Dimensions , 2005 .

[27]  Mark A. Poletti,et al.  Three-Dimensional Surround Sound Systems Based on Spherical Harmonics , 2005 .

[28]  Ralf Hiptmair,et al.  Regularized Combined Field Integral Equations , 2005, Numerische Mathematik.

[29]  X. Antoine,et al.  Alternative integral equations for the iterative solution of acoustic scattering problems , 2005 .

[30]  Y. Lu,et al.  An improved surface radiation condition for high-frequency acoustic scattering problems , 2006 .

[31]  O. Bruno,et al.  An O(1) integration scheme for three-dimensional surface scattering problems , 2007 .

[32]  X. Antoine,et al.  GENERALIZED COMBINED FIELD INTEGRAL EQUATIONS FOR THE ITERATIVE SOLUTION OF THE THREE-DIMENSIONAL HELMHOLTZ EQUATION , 2007 .

[33]  Tapio Lokki,et al.  The room acoustic rendering equation. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Stephen Langdon,et al.  A Galerkin Boundary Element Method for High Frequency Scattering by Convex Polygons , 2007, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[35]  Trevor J Cox,et al.  A transient boundary element method model of Schroeder diffuser scattering using well mouth impedance. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  M. Diligenti,et al.  A new space–time energetic formulation for wave propagation analysis in layered media by BEMs , 2008 .

[37]  M. Honnor,et al.  A numerical coordinate transformation for efficient evaluation of oscillatory integrals over wave boundary integrals , 2009 .

[38]  T. Cox,et al.  A transient boundary element method for acoustic scattering from mixed regular and thin rigid bodies , 2009 .

[39]  C. Langrenne,et al.  Measurement of confined acoustic sources using near-field acoustic holography. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  M. Diligenti,et al.  An energy approach to space–time Galerkin BEM for wave propagation problems , 2009 .

[41]  I. Graham,et al.  Condition number estimates for combined potential boundary integral operators in acoustic scattering , 2009 .

[42]  P. Harris,et al.  ON THE CHOICE OF COUPLING PARAMETER IN THE TIME DOMAIN BURTON―MILLER FORMULATION , 2009 .

[43]  P. Nelson,et al.  Nonuniqueness of the solution of the sound field reproduction problem with boundary pressure control , 2010 .

[44]  Preprint Mps Condition Number Estimates for Combined Potential Integral Operators in Acoustics and their Boundary Element Discretisation , 2010 .

[45]  I. Graham,et al.  A new frequency‐uniform coercive boundary integral equation for acoustic scattering , 2011 .

[46]  Craig T. Jin,et al.  Creating the Sydney York Morphological and Acoustic Recordings of Ears Database , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[47]  Stephen Langdon,et al.  Numerical-asymptotic boundary integral methods in high-frequency acoustic scattering* , 2012, Acta Numerica.

[48]  J. Trevelyan,et al.  Novel basis functions for the partition of unity boundary element method for Helmholtz problems , 2013 .

[49]  Stefano Giani,et al.  Boundary element dynamical energy analysis: A versatile method for solving two or three dimensional wave problems in the high frequency limit , 2012, J. Comput. Phys..

[50]  J. Trevelyan,et al.  A comparison of techniques for overcoming non‐uniqueness of boundary integral equations for the collocation partition of unity method in two‐dimensional acoustic scattering , 2013 .

[51]  F. Zotter,et al.  Is Sound Field Control Determined at All Frequencies? How Is It Related to Numerical Acoustics? , 2013 .

[52]  U. Svensson,et al.  An integral equation formulation for the diffraction from convex plates and polyhedra. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  M. Vorländer Computer simulations in room acoustics: concepts and uncertainties. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  Marion Darbas,et al.  Combining analytic preconditioner and Fast Multipole Method for the 3-D Helmholtz equation , 2013, J. Comput. Phys..

[55]  S. Creagh,et al.  In–out decomposition of boundary integral equations , 2013, 1307.3885.

[56]  Y. Lam,et al.  An energy interpretation of the Kirchhoff-Helmholtz boundary integral equation and its application to Sound Field synthesis , 2014 .

[57]  Stephen Langdon,et al.  A high frequency boundary element method for scattering by a class of nonconvex obstacles , 2014, Numerische Mathematik.

[58]  Samuel P. Groth,et al.  Hybrid numerical-asymptotic approximation for high-frequency scattering by penetrable convex polygons , 2015 .

[59]  Lauri Savioja,et al.  Overview of geometrical room acoustic modeling techniques. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  Markus Müller-Trapet,et al.  Cross-validation of measured and modeled head-related transfer functions , 2015 .

[61]  Y. Lam,et al.  A transformation approach for efficient evaluation of oscillatory surface integrals arising in three‐dimensional boundary element methods , 2016 .

[62]  S. Marburg The Burton and Miller method: Unlocking another mystery of its coupling parameter , 2016 .

[63]  Ralf Schweizer,et al.  Integral Equation Methods In Scattering Theory , 2016 .

[64]  Danna Zhou,et al.  d. , 1840, Microbial pathogenesis.