Parenting motives: Validation of the Italian version of the parental care and tenderness scale

Relevant individual differences can be observed in relation to parenting motives. The Parental Care and Tenderness (PCAT) scale is an important tool aimed at assessing them. We here investigated the psychometric properties of an Italian version of the scale (N = 946). The scale had a very high reliability and its internal structure closely reproduced the one obtained in different cultural contexts. Two major subscales, namely nurturance and protection, could be identified. In addition, we explored the validity of the scale in relation to a novel domain. Individual differences in parenting motivations, and more specifically those related to nurturance, emerged to be associated with a spontaneous behavioral tendency to approach children. Scores in the PCAT, and more specifically scores in the protection subscale, were also associated with a more conservative political orientation. The present work contributes to the growing literature about the key role of parenting motives in affecting social behaviors.

[1]  Khandis R. Blake,et al.  Experimental and cross-cultural evidence that parenthood and parental care motives increase social conservatism , 2022, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[2]  P. Bos,et al.  What a cute baby! Preliminary evidence from a fMRI study for the association between mothers’ neural responses to infant faces and activation of the parental care system , 2020, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  M. Schaller.  Evolutionary psychology meets socio-ecological psychology: the motivational psychologies of disease-avoidance and parental care. , 2020, Current opinion in psychology.

[4]  Damian R. Murray,et al.  Politics and Parental Care: Experimental and Mediational Tests of the Causal Link Between Parenting Motivation and Social Conservatism , 2020, Social Psychological and Personality Science.

[5]  François Ric,et al.  The online-VAAST: A short and online tool to measure spontaneous approach and avoidance tendencies. , 2019, Acta psychologica.

[6]  M. Schaller,et al.  Evolution, motivation, and the mating/parenting trade–off , 2019 .

[7]  Damian R. Murray,et al.  Conservative parenting: Investigating the relationships between parenthood, moral judgment, and social conservatism , 2018, Personality and Individual Differences.

[8]  M. Schaller.  The Parental Care Motivational System and Why It Matters (for Everyone) , 2018, Current Directions in Psychological Science.

[9]  François Ric,et al.  A new look at sensorimotor aspects in approach/avoidance tendencies: The role of visual whole-body movement information , 2018 .

[10]  Jarret T. Crawford.  Are Conservatives More Sensitive to Threat than Liberals? It Depends on How We Define Threat and Conservatism , 2017 .

[11]  M. Bornstein,et al.  On Cuteness: Unlocking the Parental Brain and Beyond , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Erin E Buckels,et al.  Individual differences in activation of the parental care motivational system: assessment, prediction, and implications. , 2015, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Kevin B Smith,et al.  Disgust, politics, and responses to threat , 2014, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  N. Liberman,et al.  We Take Care of Our Own , 2014, Psychological science.

[15]  D. Fessler,et al.  Stranger danger: Parenthood increases the envisioned bodily formidability of menacing men , 2014 .

[16]  M. Bornstein,et al.  Human Infant Faces Provoke Implicit Positive Affective Responses in Parents and Non-Parents Alike , 2013, PloS one.

[17]  E. Viding,et al.  Here's looking at you, kid: attention to infant emotional faces in mothers and non-mothers , 2013, Developmental science.

[18]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  Species-specific response to human infant faces in the premotor cortex , 2012, NeuroImage.

[19]  Luigi Castelli,et al.  The Automatic Conservative: Ideology-Based Attentional Asymmetries in the Processing of Valenced Information , 2011, PloS one.

[20]  Morten L. Kringelbach,et al.  The Motivational Salience of Infant Faces Is Similar for Men and Women , 2011, PloS one.

[21]  Steven E. Mock,et al.  The vigilant parent: Parental role salience affects parents' risk perceptions, risk-aversion, and trust in strangers , 2011 .

[22]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Renovating the Pyramid of Needs , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[23]  K. Lorenz,et al.  Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Erfahrung. , 2010 .

[24]  Richard P. Eibach,et al.  Priming family values: How being a parent affects moral evaluations of harmless but offensive acts , 2009 .

[25]  J. Coan,et al.  Viewing cute images increases behavioral carefulness. , 2009, Emotion.

[26]  Tobias Brosch,et al.  That baby caught my eye... attention capture by infant faces. , 2007, Emotion.

[27]  J. Jost,et al.  Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  Gijsbert Stoet,et al.  PsyToolkit: A Novel Web-Based Method for Running Online Questionnaires and Reaction-Time Experiments , 2017 .

[29]  J. Duckitt,et al.  A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice , 2001 .

[30]  D. Jackson.  Personality research form manual , 1974 .

[31]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  A. Maslow.  A Theory of Human Motivation , 1943 .