Towards a Theoretical Model for Co-Realization of IT Value in Government

Despite decades of heavy investments in information technology (IT) and information systems (IS) in government systems and considerable amounts of research on how IS contributes to organizational performance and success, IS investments are still considered risky business. Fewer than 50% of IS projects deliver the expected functionality on time and on budget. As the world becomes increasingly more complex, IS increasingly needs to function across organizational boundaries. The added complexity is likely to add to the risks of IS investments. Hence, there is a need to improve practice and to increase the success rate of IS investments, especially in government settings. To address this fundamental issue, we carried out a case study. Two strands of theoretical literature guided the study, namely benefits management and co-creation of IT value. Our contributions include a novel theoretically grounded and empirically validated approach for co-realization of IT value in collaborative settings.

[1]  John Krogstie,et al.  What is the value of eGovernment – and how can we actually realize it? , 2009 .

[2]  France Bélanger,et al.  Trust and Risk in eGovernment Adoption , 2008, AMCIS.

[3]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[4]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Stakeholder Governance: Adapting Stakeholder Theory to the E-Government Field , 2005 .

[5]  Sylwia Męcfal Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[6]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  Exploring Value Cocreation in Relationships Between an ERP Vendor and its Partners: A Revelatory Case Study , 2012, MIS Q..

[7]  Frank Bannister,et al.  ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[8]  Zahir Irani,et al.  An exploratory study of information technology evaluation and benefits management practices of SMEs in the construction industry , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[9]  J. Ward,et al.  Evaluation and realisation of IS/IT benefits: an empirical study of current practice , 1996 .

[10]  Henri Barki,et al.  Rethinking the Concept of User Involvement , 1989, MIS Q..

[11]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements , 2002 .

[12]  Elizabeth Daniel,et al.  Benefits management : delivering value from IS & IT investments , 2005 .

[13]  Hans Solli-Sæther,et al.  Benefits Realization in eGovernment: Institutional Entrepreneurship or Just Hype? , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  Chad Lin,et al.  The practice of IS/IT benefits management in large Australian organizations , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[15]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[16]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Editors' Comments - Special Issue on IS Capabilities , 2007, MIS Q. Executive.

[17]  John M. Ward,et al.  Managing the Realization of Business Benefits from IT Investments , 2007, MIS Q. Executive.

[18]  Henri Barki,et al.  Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude , 1994, MIS Q..

[19]  Tero Päivärinta,et al.  Diverging approaches to benefits realization from public ICT investments , 2013 .

[20]  Roger Elvin,et al.  A new framework for managing IT‐enabled business change , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..