A laser-optical system to re-enter or lower low Earth orbit space debris

Collisions among existing Low Earth Orbit (LEO) debris are now a main source of new debris, threatening future use of LEO space. Due to their greater number, small (1 - 10cm) debris are the main threat, while large (> 10cm) objects are the main source of new debris. Flying up and interacting with each large object is inefficient due to the energy cost of orbit plane changes, and quite expensive per object removed. Strategically, it is imperative to remove both small and large debris. Laser-Orbital-Debris-Removal (LODR), is the only solution that can address both large and small debris. In this paper, we briefly review ground-based LODR, and discuss how a polar location can dramatically increase its effectiveness for the important class of sun-synchronous orbit (SSO) objects. With 20% clear weather, a laser-optical system at either pole could lower the 8-ton ENVISAT by 40km in about 8 weeks, reducing the hazard it represents by a factor of four. We also discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a space-based LODR system. We estimate cost per object removed for these systems. International cooperation is essential for designing, building and operating any such system.

[1]  Scot S. Olivier,et al.  Intelligent sensor tasking for space collision mitigation , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[2]  C. Levit,et al.  Orbital debris–debris collision avoidance , 2011, 1103.1690.

[3]  O. V. Kulagin,et al.  Amplification and phase conjugation of weak signals , 1992 .

[4]  D. Kessler,et al.  Collision frequency of artificial satellites: The creation of a debris belt , 1978 .

[5]  W. Schall.  Orbital debris removal by laser radiation , 1991 .

[6]  P. Combis,et al.  Low-fluence laser-target coupling , 1991 .

[7]  J. Sinko.  Laser Ablation Propulsion Tractor Beam System , 2010 .

[8]  N. Basov,et al.  Gas-Dynamic Processes in Irradiation of Solids , 1969 .

[9]  Max M. Michaelis,et al.  Review: Laser-Ablation Propulsion , 2010 .

[10]  H. Klinkrad.  Space Debris: Models and Risk Analysis , 2006 .

[11]  Brian J. Bauman,et al.  Optical payload for the STARE pathfinder mission , 2011, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[12]  W. Wolfe,et al.  The Infrared Handbook , 1985 .

[13]  Momentum Transfer by Laser Ablation of Irregularly Shaped Space Debris , 2010, 1004.0390.

[14]  Claude Phipps,et al.  An Alternate Treatment of the Vapor-Plasma Transition , 2011 .

[15]  R. F. Harrison,et al.  Impulse coupling to targets in vacuum by KrF, HF, and CO2 single‐pulse lasers , 1988 .

[16]  Thomas A. Sebring,et al.  Development of lightweight stiff stable replicated glass mirrors for the Cornell Caltech Atacama Telescope (CCAT) , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[17]  K. Baker,et al.  Removing orbital debris with lasers , 2011, 1110.3835.

[18]  C. Phipps.  Laser Ablation and its Applications , 2007 .

[19]  John E. Sinko,et al.  Applying New Laser Interaction Models to the ORION Problem , 2010 .

[20]  C. Phipps,et al.  “Catcher’s Mitt” as an Alternative to laser Space Debris Mitigation , 2010 .

[21]  Douglas S. Malchow,et al.  Overview of SWIR detectors, cameras, and applications , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[22]  I. Bekey.  Project Orion: Orbital Debris Removal Using Ground-Based Sensors and Lasers , 1997 .

[23]  O. V. Kulagin,et al.  AMPLIFICATION AND PHASE CONJUGATION OF WEAK SIGNALS , 1993 .

[24]  John A. Caird,et al.  Compact, Efficient Laser Systems Required for Laser Inertial Fusion Energy , 2011 .

[25]  Thomas Sinn,et al.  ISU Team Project: An Integral View on Space Debris Mitigation and Removal , 2013 .

[26]  John A. Caird,et al.  Laser Systems for Orbital Debris Removal , 2010 .

[27]  C. Phipps,et al.  Pulsed laser interactions with space debris: Target shape effects , 2013, 1305.3659.