A novel risk evaluation method of technological innovation using an inferior ratio-based assignment model in the face of complex uncertainty

Abstract Technological innovation is critically important for high-tech firms in laying the groundwork for corporate growth and competitive advantages. It is hoped that evaluating risk accurately and effectively will contribute to assign appropriate priorities of technological innovation projects and to enhance the success rate for the whole project. In considering the issue of risk evaluation, the essential question that arises concerns strong fuzziness, ambiguity, and inexactness during the process of assessing risks. However, comparatively little research has focused on accommodating higher degrees of uncertainty in evaluating risks associated with technological innovation projects. Because the existing risk evaluation methods (such as models using net present values, internal rates of return, fuzzy logic, real options, and stochastic simulation) have certain limitations, this paper takes the powerfulness of interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy (IVPF) sets into account to handle imprecise and ambiguous information and to characterize complex uncertainty in practical risk evaluation problems. This paper aims to propose an IVPF inferior ratio (IR)-based assignment model and to establish a novel risk evaluation method of technological innovation for the purpose of appropriately tackling highly uncertain information in intricate and varied circumstances. The proposed method provides an effective way to fuse complicated information about risk assessments and to identify an aggregate ranking of technological innovation projects that has the closest agreement with all indicator-wise precedence ranks. The feasibility and applicability of the IVPF IR-based assignment model are illustrated via a real-world case concerning the risk evaluation of technological innovation in high-tech enterprises. Furthermore, the practicality and effectiveness of the developed methodology are verified through a comparative analysis with other relevant approaches.

[1]  Stephen Roper,et al.  Taking risks in the face of uncertainty: An exploratory analysis of green innovation , 2016 .

[2]  Bruce Gurd,et al.  Looking for leaders: ‘Balancing’ innovation, risk and management control systems , 2017 .

[3]  Juite Wang,et al.  A performance-oriented risk management framework for innovative R&D projects , 2010 .

[4]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  Likelihood-based assignment methods for multiple criteria decision analysis based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 2015, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[5]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  A linear assignment method for multiple-criteria decision analysis with interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2013, Appl. Soft Comput..

[6]  Shu-Hsien Liao,et al.  A fuzzy real option approach for investment project valuation , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Vasil Sgurev,et al.  Optimal Control of Technological Innovations in Post-conflict Regions by Minimization of Admissible Network Investments and Risks , 2015 .

[8]  D. Wu,et al.  Modeling technological innovation risks of an entrepreneurial team using system dynamics: An agent-based perspective , 2010 .

[9]  Juite Wang,et al.  Structuring Innovation Funnels for R&D Projects Under Uncertainty , 2017 .

[10]  Manfeng Liu,et al.  The Maximizing Deviation Method Based on Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Weighted Aggregating Operator for Multiple Criteria Group Decision Analysis , 2015 .

[11]  Ramiro Concepción,et al.  An intuitionistic method for the selection of a risk management approach to information technology projects , 2017, Inf. Sci..

[12]  Abdollah Arasteh,et al.  Considering the investment decisions with real options games approach , 2017 .

[13]  M. Cortimiglia,et al.  An economic–probabilistic model for risk analysis in technological innovation projects , 2014 .

[14]  Won Hee Lee,et al.  Technological Uncertainty and Firm Boundaries: The Moderating Effect of Knowledge Modularity , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[15]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Properties and Applications of Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets , 2016, Imprecision and Uncertainty in Information Representation and Processing.

[16]  Maria Rosaria Della Peruta,et al.  The Effects of Technological Innovation on the Banking Sector , 2015, Journal of the Knowledge Economy.

[17]  L. Manning,et al.  Agribusiness innovation: A pathway to sustainable economic growth in Africa , 2017 .

[18]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  A projection-based compromising method for multiple criteria decision analysis with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[19]  Claudia Som,et al.  Risk preventative innovation strategies for emerging technologies the cases of nano-textiles and smart textiles , 2014 .

[20]  Yuhan Wang,et al.  Risk analysis in ultra deep scientific drilling project — A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach , 2013 .

[21]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Pythagorean Membership Grades, Complex Numbers, and Decision Making , 2013, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[22]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Pythagorean Membership Grades in Multicriteria Decision Making , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[23]  Ting-Yu Chen An inclusion comparison approach for multiple criteria decision analysis based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 2015 .

[24]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Extension of TOPSIS to Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets , 2014, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[25]  Patrick Grüning International endogenous growth, macro anomalies, and asset prices , 2017 .

[26]  Xiaolu Zhang,et al.  Multicriteria Pythagorean fuzzy decision analysis: A hierarchical QUALIFLEX approach with the closeness index-based ranking methods , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[27]  Hans J.P. Marvin,et al.  Determinants of stakeholders’ attitudes towards a new technology: nanotechnology applications for food, water, energy and medicine , 2017 .

[28]  Yong Yang,et al.  Pythagorean Fuzzy Information Measures and Their Applications , 2017, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[29]  Abdollah Hadi-Vencheh,et al.  Fuzzy inferior ratio method for multiple attribute decision making problems , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[30]  Anastasia Ioannou,et al.  Risk-based methods for sustainable energy system planning: a review , 2017 .

[31]  Jian-Li Luo,et al.  Risk paradigm and risk evaluation of farmers cooperatives' technology innovation , 2015 .

[32]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  A new model for intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attributes decision making , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Harish Garg,et al.  A novel accuracy function under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment for solving multicriteria decision making problem , 2016, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[34]  K. Atanassov,et al.  Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets , 2019, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing.

[35]  Wang Yingming,et al.  Using the method of maximizing deviation to make decision for multiindices , 2012 .

[36]  Yong Yang,et al.  Fundamental Properties of Interval‐Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Aggregation Operators , 2016, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[37]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  The extended linear assignment method for multiple criteria decision analysis based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 2014 .

[38]  Krassimir T. Atanassov,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1986 .