Robots as social mediators for children with Autism - A preliminary analysis comparing two different robotic platforms

Robots can be very helpful therapeutic tools, especially for children with special needs. In the present paper we describe the application of two robotic platforms with different design parameters in interaction with children with autism and other cognitive impairments. IROMEC is a mobile robotic platform designed for children with different levels of disabilities to encourage them to be engaged in social interactions. KASPAR is a humanoid child-size robot designed for social interaction. KASPAR has been used extensively in studies with children with autism. The aim of this study is to examine how KASPAR and IROMEC can support social interaction and facilitate the cognitive and social development of children with special needs via play activities. Natural engagement in social play behaviour is often a problem in the development of children with disabilities. Due to the nature of their disabilities they are often excluded from such activities. As part of a long-term study we carried out different play scenarios based on imitation, turn taking and the cause and effect game according to the main educational and therapeutic objectives considered important for child development. In this paper we focus on the turn taking and the imitation game scenarios. A preliminary analysis of the data showed encouraging results. The level of the improvement of the children depended on the level and nature of their disabilities.

[1]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  'Make it move': playing cause and effect games with a robot companion for children with cognitive disabilities , 2011, ECCE.

[2]  Susan Canizares,et al.  MAKE A MOVE , 2000 .

[3]  Serenella Besio,et al.  Analysis of critical factors involved uin using interactive robots for education and therapy of children with disabilities: IROMEC, Interactive robotic social mediators as companions, IST-FP6-045356 , 2008 .

[4]  Hideki Kozima,et al.  Designing and observing human-robot interactions for the study of social development and its disorders , 2005, 2005 International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation.

[5]  Stephen Langendorfer,et al.  Test of Gross Motor Development , 1986 .

[6]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Title of paper : KASPAR – A Minimally Expressive Humanoid Robot for Human-Robot Interaction Research , 2009 .

[7]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  From Isolation to Communication: A Case Study Evaluation of Robot Assisted Play for Children with Autism with a Minimally Expressive Humanoid Robot , 2009, 2009 Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions.

[9]  P. Mundy,et al.  Joint Attention and Early Social Communication: Implications for Research on Intervention with Autism , 1997, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[10]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Human-centred design methods: Developing scenarios for robot assisted play informed by user panels and field trials , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  B. Robins,et al.  Robot-mediated joint attention in children with autism : A case study in robot-human interaction , 2004 .

[12]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Therapeutic and educational objectives in robot assisted play for children with autism , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[13]  Patrizia Marti Bringing playfulness to disabilities , 2010, NordiCHI.

[14]  D. Perrett,et al.  Imitation, mirror neurons and autism , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[15]  T. Shibata,et al.  Engaging with artificial pets , 2005 .

[16]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Collaborating with Kaspar: Using an autonomous humanoid robot to foster cooperative dyadic play among children with autism , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[17]  J. Farber,et al.  Understanding Autism , 1984, Clinical pediatrics.

[18]  Aude Billard,et al.  Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? , 2005, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[19]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Tactile interaction with a humanoid robot for children with autism: A case study analysis involving user requirements and results of an initial implementation , 2010, 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[20]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[21]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Developing Play Scenarios for Tactile Interaction with a Humanoid Robot: A Case Study Exploration with Children with Autism , 2010, ICSR.

[22]  L. Wing,et al.  Severe impairments of social interaction and associated abnormalities in children: Epidemiology and classification , 1979, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[23]  T. Power Play and Exploration in Children and Animals , 1999 .

[24]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  Towards interactive robots in autism therapy: background, motivation and challenges , 2004 .

[25]  François Michaud,et al.  Perspectives on Mobile Robots as Tools for Child Development and Pediatric Rehabilitation , 2007, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[26]  A. Bondy,et al.  The Picture Exchange Communication System , 2001, Behavior modification.

[27]  P. Ravindra De Silva,et al.  Therapeutic-assisted robot for children with autism , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[28]  Emilia I. Barakova,et al.  Engaging Autistic Children in Imitation and Turn-Taking Games with Multiagent System of Interactive Lighting Blocks , 2010, ICEC.

[29]  S. Spitzer,et al.  14 – Play in Children with Autism: Structure and Experience , 2008 .