Leveling the Playing Field: A New Proposed Method to Address Relative Age- and Maturity-Related Bias in Soccer

Despite various solutions proposed to solve the relative age effect (RAE), it is still a major problem confounding talent identification and selection processes. In the first phase, we sampled 302 under 7–21 academy soccer players from two Belgian professional soccer clubs to explore the potential of a new approach to solve the inequalities resulting from relative age- and maturity-related bias. This approach allocates players into four discrete quartile groups based on the midway point of their chronological and estimated developmental (ED) birth dates (calculated using the growth curves for stature of Belgian youth). With the use of chi square analyses, a RAE was found (p < 0.01) for the overall sample (Q1 = 41.4% vs. Q4 = 14.9%) that completely disappeared after reallocation (Q1 = 26.5%; Q2 = 21.9%; Q3 = 27.5%; Q4 = 24.2%). According to the new allocation method, the stature difference was reduced, on average, by 11.6 cm (from 24.0 ± 9.9 to 12.4 ± 3.4 cm, d = 1.57). Body mass difference between the two methods was 1.9 kg (20.1 ± 11.3–18.2 ± 13.1 kg, respectively, d = 0.15). The new method created a maximum chronological age difference of 1.9 vs. 0.8 years for the current method. With the use of this method, 47% of the players would be reallocated. Twenty-three percent would be moved up one age category, and 21% would be moved down. In the second phase, we also examined 80 UK academy soccer players to explore if reallocating players reduces the within-playing group variation of somatic and physical fitness characteristics. The percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) was reduced (0.2–10.1%) in 15 out of 20 metrics across U11–U16 age categories, with the U13 age category demonstrating the largest reductions (0.9–10.1%) in CV. The U12 and U13 age categories and associated reallocation groupings showed trivial to small (ES = 0.0–0.5) between-method differences and trivial to moderate (ES = 0.0–1.1) differences within the U14–U16 age categories. A reduction in RAE may lead to fewer dropouts and thus a larger player pool, which benefits, in turn, talent identification, selection, and development.

[1]  J. Sampaio,et al.  The effect of bio-banding on physical and psychological indicators of talent identification in academy soccer players , 2020, Science & medicine in football.

[2]  Allistair P. McRobert,et al.  Research in Another un-Examined (RAE) context. A chronology of 35 years of relative age effect research in soccer: is it time to move on? , 2020, Science & medicine in football.

[3]  Jack D. Ade,et al.  Maturity-associated considerations for training load, injury risk, and physical performance in youth soccer: One size does not fit all , 2020, Journal of sport and health science.

[4]  W. Helsen,et al.  Relative Age Effects in Youth and Elite Sport , 2020 .

[5]  D. Born,et al.  Bio-banding in junior soccer players: a pilot study , 2020, BMC Research Notes.

[6]  J. M. Izquierdo,et al.  The relative effect of age in international football: Europe vs South America , 2020, European Journal of Human Movement.

[7]  N. Smeeton,et al.  Effects of Bio-Banding upon Physical and Technical Performance during Soccer Competition: A Preliminary Analysis , 2019, Sports.

[8]  D. Court,et al.  Practitioners’ multi-disciplinary perspectives of soccer talent according to phase of development and playing position , 2019, International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching.

[9]  S. Cobley,et al.  When does the influence of maturation on anthropometric and physical fitness characteristics increase and subside? , 2018, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[10]  Daniel J. Brown,et al.  Premier League academy soccer players’ experiences of competing in a tournament bio-banded for biological maturation , 2018, Journal of sports sciences.

[11]  M. Reeves,et al.  Stakeholders’ understanding and perceptions of bio-banding in junior-elite football training , 2018 .

[12]  W. Helsen,et al.  The interaction between constituent year and within‐1‐year effects in elite German youth basketball , 2017, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[13]  R. Malina,et al.  Bio-banding in Sport: Applications to Competition, Talent Identification, and Strength and Conditioning of Youth Athletes , 2017 .

[14]  D. Mann,et al.  Age-ordered shirt numbering reduces the selection bias associated with the relative age effect , 2017, Journal of sports sciences.

[15]  W. Helsen,et al.  Geographical Variations in the Interaction of Relative Age Effects in Youth and Adult Elite Soccer , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[16]  Stephen Cobley,et al.  Relative Age, Maturation and Physical Biases on Position Allocation in Elite-Youth Soccer , 2017, International Journal of Sports Medicine.

[17]  S. Cobley,et al.  Soccer Player Characteristics in English Lower-League Development Programmes: The Relationships between Relative Age, Maturation, Anthropometry and Physical Fitness , 2015, PloS one.

[18]  Job Fransen,et al.  Characteristics of high-level youth soccer players: variation by playing position , 2015, Journal of sports sciences.

[19]  J. Schorer,et al.  Correction: A New Dimension to Relative Age Effects: Constant Year Effects in German Youth Handball , 2013, PLoS ONE.

[20]  W. Helsen,et al.  The relative age effect in European professional soccer: Did ten years of research make any difference? , 2012, Journal of sports sciences.

[21]  Kevin Till,et al.  The Long-Term Athlete Development model: Physiological evidence and application , 2011, Journal of sports sciences.

[22]  G. Howell,et al.  Hockey success and birth date: The relative age effect revisited , 2010 .

[23]  M. Roelants,et al.  References for growth and pubertal development from birth to 21 years in Flanders, Belgium , 2009, Annals of human biology.

[24]  C. Carling,et al.  Do anthropometric and fitness characteristics vary according to birth date distribution in elite youth academy soccer players? , 2008, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[25]  R. Malina,et al.  TW3 and Fels skeletal ages in elite youth soccer players , 2007, Annals of human biology.

[26]  G. Beunen,et al.  Indicators of Biological Maturation and Secular Changes in Biological Maturation , 2006, Food and nutrition bulletin.

[27]  Jan Bourgois,et al.  The relationship between peak height velocity and physical performance in youth soccer players , 2006, Journal of sports sciences.

[28]  A Mark Williams,et al.  The relative age effect in youth soccer across Europe , 2005, Journal of sports sciences.

[29]  Jochen Musch,et al.  Unequal Competition as an Impediment to Personal Development: A Review of the Relative Age Effect in Sport☆ , 2001 .

[30]  William Hurley,et al.  A Proposal to Reduce the Age Discrimination in Canadian Minor Hockey , 2001 .

[31]  Janet L. Starkes,et al.  Effect of a change in selection year on success in male soccer players , 2000, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[32]  Jochen Musch,et al.  The Relative Age Effect in Soccer: Cross-Cultural Evidence for a Systematic Discrimination against Children Born Late in the Competition Year , 1999 .

[33]  L. Epstein,et al.  Do children lose and maintain weight easier than adults: a comparison of child and parent weight changes from six months to ten years. , 1995, Obesity research.

[34]  J Verhulst,et al.  Seasonal birth distribution of west European soccer players: a possible explanation. , 1992, Medical hypotheses.

[35]  O. Bar-or,et al.  Growth, Maturation and Physical Activity , 1992 .

[36]  A. Thompson,et al.  Birthdate and success in minor hockey: The key to the NHL , 1988 .

[37]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[38]  S. Marshall,et al.  Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[39]  J. Baker,et al.  Annual Age-Grouping and Athlete Development , 2009, Sports medicine.

[40]  Rebecca K. Tanner,et al.  Physiological tests for elite athletes , 2000 .

[41]  W. Helsen,et al.  The influence of relative age on success and dropout in male soccer players , 1998, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[42]  J. Boucher,et al.  The Novem System: a practical solution to age grouping. , 1991 .

[43]  Ja Draper,et al.  The 505 test : a test for agility in horizontal plane , 1985 .