Modelling and analysis of floating spar-type wind turbine drivetrain

This paper studies the drivetrain dynamics of a 750 kW spar-type floating wind turbine (FWT). The drivetrain studied is a high-speed generator, one-stage planetary, two-stage parallel and three-point support type. The response analysis is carried out in two steps. First, global aero-hydro-elastic-servo time-domain analyses are performed using HAWC2. The main shaft loads, which include the axial forces, shear forces and bending moments, are obtained in this integrated wind–wave response analysis. These loads are then used as inputs for the multi-body drivetrain time-domain analyses in SIMPACK. The investigations are largely based on comparisons of the main shaft loads and internal drivetrain responses from 1 h simulations. The tooth contact forces, bearing loads and gear deflections are the internal drivetrain response variables studied. The comparisons are based on the mean values, standard deviations and maximum values extrapolated using a 10 − 5 up-crossing rate. Both operational and parked conditions are considered. The investigation consists of three parts. First, the responses are compared between the FWT and its equivalent land-based version. Second, the contributions from the main shaft loads (shear forces, axial forces and bending moments) and nacelle motions are investigated individually. Third, an improved four-point support (4PT) system is studied and compared against the original three-point support system for the FWT. The results show that there are general increases in the standard deviations of the main shaft loads and internal drivetrain responses in the FWT. In addition, these increases are a result of the increased main shaft loads in the FWT, especially the non-torque loads. Last, the 4PT system, when applied to a FWT drivetrain, significantly reduces the tooth contact forces and bearing loads in the low-speed stage, but this result comes at the expense of increased main bearing radial loads. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  EFFECT OF SPAR-TYPE FLOATING WIND TURBINE NACELLE MOTIONS ON DRIVETRAIN DYNAMICS: DE-RISKING OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE DESIGN, Scientific proceedings of the European Wind Energy Conference (EWEA2012), 16-19 April 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark , 2012 .

[2]  Paul Sas,et al.  Analysis of internal drive train dynamics in a wind turbine , 2004 .

[3]  F. Oyague.  Gearbox Modeling and Load Simulation of a Baseline 750-kW Wind Turbine Using State-of-the-Art Simulation Codes , 2009 .

[4]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  A simplified method for coupled analysis of floating offshore wind turbines , 2012 .

[5]  F. Oyague.  Progressive Dynamical Drive Train Modeling as Part of NREL Gearbox Reliability Collaborative (Poster) , 2008 .

[6]  Madjid Karimirad.  Stochastic Dynamic Response Analysis of Spar-Type Wind Turbines with Catenary or Taut Mooring Systems , 2011 .

[7]  Wim Desmet,et al.  Multibody modelling of varying complexity for modal behaviour analysis of wind turbine gearboxes , 2010 .

[8]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Hydroelastic code-to-code comparison for a tension leg spar-type floating wind turbine , 2011 .

[9]  Wim Desmet,et al.  The influence of flexibility within multibody modeling of multi-megawatt wind turbine gearboxes , 2008 .

[10]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Extreme Dynamic Structural Response Analysis of Catenary Moored Spar Wind Turbine in Harsh Environmental Conditions , 2011 .

[11]  Torben J. Larsen,et al.  A method to avoid negative damped low frequent tower vibrations for a floating, pitch controlled wind turbine , 2007 .

[12]  H. Madsen,et al.  A Beddoes-Leishman type dynamic stall model in state-space and indicial formulations , 2004 .

[13]  Wim Desmet,et al.  Optimized inclusion of flexibility in wind turbine gearbox multibody model in view of model updating on dynamic test rig , 2010 .

[14]  Finn Gunnar Nielsen,et al.  Integrated Dynamic Analysis of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines , 2006 .

[15]  Arvid Naess,et al.  Extreme response prediction for nonlinear floating offshore structures by Monte Carlo simulation , 2007 .

[16]  Yihan Xing,et al.  Effect of spar-type floating wind turbine nacelle motion on drivetrain dynamics , 2012 .

[17]  F. Oyague.  Progressive Dynamical Drive Train Modeling as Part of NREL Gearbox Reliability Collaborative: Preprint , 2008 .

[18]  Moo-Hyun Kim,et al.  Mathieu instability of a spar platform with mooring and risers , 2004 .

[19]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  An inertia-capacitance beam substructure formulation based on the bond graph method with application to rotating beams , 2011 .

[20]  W. LaCava,et al.  Gearbox Reliability Collaborative Project Report: Findings from Phase 1 and Phase 2 Testing , 2011 .

[21]  Paul Sas,et al.  Flexible multibody model of a three-stage planetary gearbox in a wind turbine , 2004 .

[22]  Sungho Lee,et al.  Floating Offshore Wind Turbines: Responses in a Seastate Pareto Optimal Designs and Economic Assessment , 2008 .

[23]  Odd M. Faltinsen,et al.  Sea loads on ships and offshore structures , 1990 .

[24]  F. Oyague,et al.  NREL Gearbox Reliability Collaborative Experimental Data Overview and Analysis: Preprint , 2010 .

[25]  S. Sheng,et al.  Gearbox Reliability Collaborative Analysis Round Robin: Preprint , 2009 .

[26]  Jason Jonkman,et al.  Definition of the Floating System for Phase IV of OC3 , 2010 .

[27]  Yi Guo,et al.  Determining Wind Turbine Gearbox Model Complexity Using Measurement Validation and Cost Comparison: Preprint , 2012 .

[28]  J. Mann.  The spatial structure of neutral atmospheric surface-layer turbulence , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[29]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Extreme Structural Dynamic Response of a Spar Type Wind Turbine , 2010 .

[30]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Wave- and Wind-Induced Dynamic Response of a Spar-Type Offshore Wind Turbine , 2012 .

[31]  E. Haug,et al.  Geometric non‐linear substructuring for dynamics of flexible mechanical systems , 1988 .

[32]  Jason Jonkman,et al.  Dynamics Modeling and Loads Analysis of an Offshore Floating Wind Turbine , 2007 .

[33]  S. Haver,et al.  Joint Distribution For Wind And Waves In the Northern North Sea , 2002 .

[34]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Short-Term Fatigue Analysis of Semi-Submersible Wind Turbine Tower , 2011 .

[35]  Wim Desmet,et al.  Insights in wind turbine drive train dynamics gathered by validating advanced models on a newly developed 13.2 MW dynamically controlled test-rig , 2011 .

[36]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Dynamic Motion Analysis of Catenary Moored Spar Wind Turbine in Extreme Environmental Condition , 2009 .