Space Versus Time Separation for Wireless Virtualization on an Indoor Grid

The decreasing cost of wireless hardware and ever increasing number of wireless testbeds has led to a shift in the protocol evaluation paradigm from simulations towards emulation. In addition, with a large number of users demanding experimental resources and lack of space and time for deploying more hardware, fair resource sharing among independent co-existing experiments is important. We study the proposed approaches to wireless virtualization with a focus on schemes conserving wireless channels rather than nodes. Our detailed comparison reveals that while experiments sharing a channel by space separation achieve better efficiency than those relying on time separation of a channel, the isolation between experiments in both cases is comparable. We propose and implement a policy manager to alleviate the isolation problem and suggest scenarios in which either of the schemes would provide a suitable virtualization solution.

[1]  Zhibin Wu,et al.  Experimental investigation of PHY layer rate control and frequency selection in 802.11-based ad-hoc networks , 2005, E-WIND '05.

[2]  Dipankar Raychaudhuri,et al.  Interworking of Self-organizing Hierarchical Ad Hoc Networks and the Internet , 2006, International Conference on Computational Science.

[3]  Dipankar Raychaudhuri,et al.  Experimental evaluation of the TCP simultaneous-send problem in 802.11 wireless local area networks , 2005, E-WIND '05.

[4]  Sampath Rangarajan,et al.  Make-Before-Break MAC Layer Handoff in 802.11 Wireless Networks , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[5]  Roy D. Yates,et al.  Mapping link SNRs of wireless mesh networks onto an indoor testbed , 2006, 2nd International Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities, 2006. TRIDENTCOM 2006..

[6]  Wenyuan Xu,et al.  Jamming sensor networks: attack and defense strategies , 2006, IEEE Network.

[7]  Wenyuan Xu,et al.  Securing wireless systems via lower layer enforcements , 2006, WiSe '06.

[8]  Dipankar Raychaudhuri,et al.  INTEGRATING SHORT-RANGE AD-HOC RADIO TECHNOLOGIES INTO NEXT-GENERATION WIRELESS NETWORKS , 2004 .

[9]  Dipankar Raychaudhuri,et al.  Integration of heterogeneous networking testbeds , 2008 .

[10]  Marco Gruteser,et al.  Mobility Emulation Through Spatial Switching on a Wireless Grid , 2005 .

[11]  Gregory Smith,et al.  Wireless virtualization on commodity 802.11 hardware , 2007, WinTECH '07.

[12]  윤창근 해외동향 : Global Environment for Network Innovations(GENI): 미국의 미래 인터넷 전략 , 2010 .

[13]  Jennifer Rexford,et al.  Stealth Probing: Efficient Data-Plane Security for IP Routing , 2006, USENIX Annual Technical Conference, General Track.

[14]  Sanjit Krishnan Kaul,et al.  Creating wireless multi-hop topologies on space-constrained indoor testbeds through noise injection , 2006, 2nd International Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities, 2006. TRIDENTCOM 2006..

[15]  Manpreet Singh,et al.  Overview of the ORBIT radio grid testbed for evaluation of next-generation wireless network protocols , 2005, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2005.

[16]  Roy D. Yates,et al.  Wireless link SNR mapping onto an indoor testbed , 2005, First International Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the DEvelopment of NeTworks and COMmunities.

[17]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  SIP-Based Mobility Architecture for Next Generation Wireless Networks , 2005, Third IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications.

[18]  Marco Gruteser,et al.  Methods for restoring MAC layer fairness in IEEE 802.11 networks with physical layer capture , 2006, REALMAN '06.

[19]  Jeff Dike,et al.  A user-mode port of the Linux kernel , 2000, Annual Linux Showcase & Conference.