In vitro and in vivo corrosion of the novel magnesium alloy Mg–La–Nd–Zr: influence of the measurement technique and in vivo implant location

For the evaluation of new magnesium-based alloys, many different in vitro and in vivo methods are used. It was the aim of the current study to perform in vitro and in vivo corrosion studies of the new alloy Mg-La-Nd-Zr for its evaluation as a promising new degradable material and to compare commonly used evaluation methods. Die casted and subsequent extruded cylindrical pins (Ø1.5 mm; length 7 mm, [Formula: see text]) were implanted subcutaneously ([Formula: see text]), intramuscular ([Formula: see text]) and intramedullary ([Formula: see text]) in female Lewis rats with a postoperative follow up of 8 weeks; subsequent μ-computed tomographical analyses (XTremeCT and μCT80) were performed as well as weight analysis prior to and after implantation. Cubes (5 mm  ×  4 mm  ×  4 mm; surface area, 1.12 cm(2); [Formula: see text]) were used for in vitro corrosion (HBSS and RPMI 1640 + 10% FBS medium) and cytocompatibility studies (L929 cells). First of all it could be stated that implant location strongly influences the in vivo corrosion rate. In particular, intramedullary implanted pins corroded faster than pins in a subcutaneous or intramuscular environment. Considering the different evaluation methods, the calculated ex vivo μCT-based corrosion rates resulted in comparable values to the corrosion rates calculated by the weight loss method, especially after chromatic acid treatment of the explanted pins. The in vitro methods used tend to show similar corrosion rates compared to in vivo corrosion, especially when a RPMI medium was used, and therefore are suitable to predict corrosion trends prior to in vivo studies. Regarding cytocompatibility, the novel magnesium alloy Mg-La-Nd-Zr showed sufficient cell viability and therefore can be considered as a promising alloy for further applications.

[1]  Frank Witte,et al.  Corrosion of magnesium alloy AZ31 screws is dependent on the implantation site , 2011 .

[2]  Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  In Vivo Degradation Behavior of the Magnesium Alloy LANd442 in Rabbit Tibiae , 2011, Materials.

[3]  R. Willumeit,et al.  Optimization of Cell Adhesion on Mg Based Implant Materials by Pre-Incubation under Cell Culture Conditions , 2014, International journal of molecular sciences.

[4]  Karl Ulrich Kainer,et al.  Element distribution in the corrosion layer and cytotoxicity of alloy Mg-10Dy during in vitro biodegradation. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[5]  V. Balasubramanian,et al.  Comparison of the corrosion behaviour of AZ31B magnesium alloy under immersion test and potentiodynamic polarization test in NaCl solution , 2014 .

[6]  Henning Windhagen,et al.  In Vivo Corrosion of Two Novel Magnesium Alloys ZEK100 and AX30 and Their Mechanical Suitability as Biodegradable Implants , 2011, Materials.

[7]  Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  Degrading magnesium screws ZEK100: biomechanical testing, degradation analysis and soft-tissue biocompatibility in a rabbit model , 2013, Biomedical materials.

[8]  C. Ceccarini,et al.  pH as a determinant of cellular growth and contact inhibition. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  H. Haferkamp,et al.  In vivo corrosion of four magnesium alloys and the associated bone response. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[10]  Frank Witte,et al.  In vitro and in vivo corrosion measurements of magnesium alloys. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[11]  Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  Long-term in vivo degradation behaviour and biocompatibility of the magnesium alloy ZEK100 for use as a biodegradable bone implant. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[12]  T. Woodfield,et al.  The in vitro and in vivo evaluation of the biocompatibility of Mg alloys , 2013, Biomedical materials.

[13]  P. Uggowitzer,et al.  In vivo degradation performance of micro-arc-oxidized magnesium implants: a micro-CT study in rats. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[14]  Henning Windhagen,et al.  In vivo assessment of the host reactions to the biodegradation of the two novel magnesium alloys ZEK100 and AX30 in an animal model , 2012, Biomedical engineering online.

[15]  Janine Fischer,et al.  Improved cytotoxicity testing of magnesium materials , 2011 .

[16]  G. Sjögren,et al.  Cytotoxicity of dental alloys, metals, and ceramics assessed by millipore filter, agar overlay, and MTT tests. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  S. Stanzl-Tschegg,et al.  Bone-implant interface strength and osseointegration: Biodegradable magnesium alloy versus standard titanium control. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[18]  E. Wintermantel,et al.  Fibroblastic response and surface characterization of O2-plasma-treated thermoplastic polyetherurethane , 2010, Biomedical materials.

[19]  Yang Song,et al.  Research on an Mg-Zn alloy as a degradable biomaterial. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[20]  E. Willbold,et al.  Biodegradation of a magnesium alloy implant in the intercondylar femoral notch showed an appropriate response to the synovial membrane in a rabbit model in vivo , 2014, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[21]  Andrej Atrens,et al.  Measurement of the corrosion rate of magnesium alloys using Tafel extrapolation , 2010 .

[22]  Fritz Thorey,et al.  Biomechanical testing and degradation analysis of MgCa0.8 alloy screws: a comparative in vivo study in rabbits. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[23]  J. Nellesen,et al.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of biodegradable, open-porous scaffolds made of sintered magnesium W4 short fibres. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[24]  P. Uggowitzer,et al.  Magnesium alloys for temporary implants in osteosynthesis: in vivo studies of their degradation and interaction with bone. , 2012, Acta biomaterialia.

[25]  Bryan E. Anderson,et al.  The Netter Collection of medical illustrations , 1994 .

[26]  H. Wong,et al.  A biodegradable polymer-based coating to control the performance of magnesium alloy orthopaedic implants. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[27]  F. Beckmann,et al.  In vivo corrosion and corrosion protection of magnesium alloy LAE442. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[28]  Henning Windhagen,et al.  Novel magnesium alloy Mg-2La caused no cytotoxic effects on cells in physiological conditions. , 2014, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[29]  Frank Feyerabend,et al.  Mg and Mg alloys: how comparable are in vitro and in vivo corrosion rates? A review. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.

[30]  Andrej Atrens,et al.  The in vivo and in vitro corrosion of high-purity magnesium and magnesium alloys WZ21 and AZ91 , 2013 .

[31]  J. Seitz,et al.  Characterization of MgNd2 alloy for potential applications in bioresorbable implantable devices. , 2012, Acta biomaterialia.

[32]  M. Gupta,et al.  Insight into Designing Biocompatible Magnesium Alloys and Composites: Processing, Mechanical and Corrosion Characteristics , 2015 .

[33]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Zirconium and Niobium Affect Human Osteoblasts, Fibroblasts, and Lymphocytes in a Similar Manner to More Traditional Implant Alloy Metals , 2006 .

[34]  J. Reifenrath,et al.  Influence of the grain size on the in vivo degradation behaviour of the magnesium alloy LAE442 , 2013, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[35]  Tim Woodfield,et al.  Magnesium alloys: predicting in vivo corrosion with in vitro immersion testing. , 2012, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[36]  W. Tillmann,et al.  Biocompatibility of rapidly solidified magnesium alloy RS66 as a temporary biodegradable metal. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.