Organizational Differences in Rates of Learning: Evidence from the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

This paper examines learning curves in the health care setting to determine whether organizations achieve performance improvements from cumulative experience at different rates. Although extensive research has shown that cumulative experience leads to performance improvement across numerous contexts, the question of how much of this improvement is due to mere experience and how much is due to collective learning processes has received little attention. We argue that organizational learning processes may allow some organizations to benefit more than others from equivalent levels of experience. We thus propose that learning curves can vary across organizations engaged in the same "learning task," due to organizational learning effects. To investigate this proposition, we investigate cardiac surgery departments implementing a new technology for minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Data on operative procedure times from a sample of 660 patients who underwent the new operation at 16 different institutions are analyzed. The results confirm that cumulative experience is a significant predictor of learning, and further reveal that the slope of the learning curve varies significantly across organizations. Theoretical and practical implications of the work are discussed.

[1]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[2]  R. Duncan.  Organizational Learning : Implications for organizational design , 1979 .

[3]  H. Gruber.  The learning curve in the production of semiconductor memory chips , 1992 .

[4]  Danny Miller,et al.  The Icarus Paradox: How Exceptional Companies Bring About Their Own Downfall , 1990 .

[5]  L. Argote,et al.  Learning Curves in Manufacturing , 1990, Science.

[6]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[7]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  Learning new technical and interpersonal routines in operating room teams The case of minimally invasive cardiac surgery , 2000 .

[8]  G M McKhann,et al.  Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  L. Argote,et al.  The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings , 1990 .

[10]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Ugly Duckling No More: Pasts and Futures of Organizational Learning Research , 1996 .

[11]  F L Grover,et al.  Volume requirements for cardiac surgery credentialing: a critical examination. The Ad Hoc Committee on Cardiac Surgery Credentialing of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  Gustavo Stubrich.  The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[13]  Linda Argote,et al.  Group Learning Curves: The Effects of Turnover and Task Complexity on Group Performance1 , 1995 .

[14]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[15]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Perspectives on Technology. , 1978 .

[16]  D. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction , 1994 .

[17]  T. Reid.  Shared learning. , 1996, Nursing times.

[18]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  How learning by doing is done: problem identification in novel process equipment☆ , 1995 .

[19]  Bertrand Moingeon,et al.  When to Learn How and When to Learn Why: Appropriate Organizational Learning Processes as a Source of Competitive Advantage , 1996 .

[20]  D. Mowery,et al.  Process Innovation and Learning by Doing in Semiconductor Manufacturing , 1998 .

[21]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[22]  A. Edmondson,et al.  From Organizational Learning to the Learning Organization , 1998 .

[23]  P PisanoGary,et al.  Organizational Differences in Rates of Learning , 2001 .

[24]  T. P. Wright,et al.  Factors affecting the cost of airplanes , 1936 .

[25]  J. Ruiz Moreno.  [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[26]  Ron S. Jarmin,et al.  Learning by Doing and Competition in the Early Rayon Industry , 1994 .

[27]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[28]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[29]  K Sheikh,et al.  The relation between volume and outcome in health care. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  Linda Argote,et al.  Organizational Learning Curves: A Method for Investigating Intra-Plant Transfer of Knowledge Acquired Through Learning by Doing , 1991 .

[31]  James A. Narus,et al.  Turn Your Industrial Distributors into Partners , 1986 .

[32]  J. Dutton,et al.  Treating Progress Functions as a Managerial Opportunity , 1984 .

[33]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Behind the learning curve: a sketch of the learning process , 1991 .

[34]  Carol A. Saslow,et al.  Basic research methods , 1982 .

[35]  H. Gruber.  The yield factor and the learning curve in semiconductor production , 1994 .

[36]  Linda Argote,et al.  Training People to Work in Groups , 2002 .

[37]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Appropriability of innovation benefit as a predictor of the source of innovation , 1982 .

[38]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  What's Experience Got to Do With It? Sources of Cost Reduction in a Large Specialty Chemicals Producer , 2000 .

[39]  S. Winter,et al.  The Schumpeterian Tradeoff Revisited , 1982 .