Does playing the serious game B-SaFe! make citizens more aware of man-made and natural risks in their environment?

The goal of the present study was to investigate whether playing a serious game concerning natural and man-made risks leads to increased risk awareness and additional information search. As an experimental task, we developed a serious board game. Fifty-six students participated in the experiment; half of them played the serious game whereas the other half only filled in a questionnaire at pretest and posttest (after two weeks). Participants who had played the game were more aware of risks in their own environment. Furthermore, playing the serious game counterbalanced the decline in self-efficacy as seen in the control condition. In both conditions, participants gathered more information on natural risks. This positive effect in the control condition is probably a side effect of the method used: a reasonably elaborate questionnaire in combination with a delay of two weeks. In all, the results provide a positive basis for further development of the game and to use it on a larger scale to empower citizens to take more responsibility for their own safety.

[1]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  R. Rimal,et al.  Closing the Knowledge-Behavior Gap in Health Promotion: The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy , 2000, Health communication.

[3]  Jan M. Gutteling,et al.  Yes, we can: motivate Dutch citizens to engage in self-protective behavior with regard to flood risks , 2011 .

[4]  A. Cremers,et al.  Construction of Health Preferences: A Comparison of Direct Value Assessment and Personal Narratives , 2009, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[5]  Shaaron E. Ainsworth,et al.  Endogenous fantasy and learning in digital games , 2015 .

[6]  P. Vorderer,et al.  Serious games : mechanisms and effects , 2009 .

[7]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  Jesse Schell,et al.  The Art of Game Design: A book of lenses , 2019 .

[9]  Ronald W. Perry,et al.  Behavioral foundations of community emergency planning , 1992 .

[10]  James M. Boyle,et al.  A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[11]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[12]  M. Allen,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns , 2000, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[13]  Jan M. Gutteling,et al.  How to trust? The importance of self‐efficacy and social trust in public responses to industrial risks , 2009 .

[14]  M. Kuttschreuter Communicating environmental risk in multiethnic communities , 2005 .

[15]  P. Ubel,et al.  Reducing the Influence of Anecdotal Reasoning on People’s Health Care Decisions: Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Statistics? , 2005, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[16]  Teun Terpstra,et al.  Emotions, Trust, and Perceived Risk: Affective and Cognitive Routes to Flood Preparedness Behavior , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Construction of Preference: The Affect Heuristic , 2006 .

[18]  Douglas Paton,et al.  Risk communication and natural hazard mitigation: how trust influences its effectiveness , 2008 .

[19]  Teun Terpstra,et al.  Flood preparedness : thoughts, feelings and intentions of the Dutch public , 2010 .