Exploratory drug safety: a discovery strategy to reduce attrition in development.

Identification of novel new molecules which hold the greatest promise of safe and effective therapies remains a continuous challenge to the pharmaceutical industry. This has led the industry to implement strategies for identification of the most promising candidates during the discovery phase and for their safe and expeditious advancement through development. Testing for potential liable properties in the discovery phase has included the evaluation of major areas of pharmaceutics that have led to failure such as its physical and pharmaceutical properties, drug metabolism and pharmacokinetic characteristics, various safety endpoints including pre-development safety pharmacology, general toxicology and genetic toxicology and interrogation of counter-screen data to identify off-target affinities (i.e., receptors, ion channels, transporters, kinases, etc.) that pose a concern. Amongst the many important areas of concern is the potential for toxicities of the major organ systems. To mitigate this concern, a strategy pursued is to identify the prominent toxicological properties of the candidate prior to its recommendation for development. The results of these studies in discovery allow exclusion of the candidate before the expenditure of resources and time typical of development. In addition, the discovery phase toxicology studies serve to address key questions that may have arisen from the study of another molecule, the phenotypic profile from pre-clinical models where the therapeutic target has been genetically modified or concerns that have been raised as a result of other investigations. Importantly, the results of the exploratory drug safety studies will be used by the sponsor to judge the potential risks associated with continued pursuit of a potential development candidate. In many ways, pre-clinical toxicological investigations in discovery serve the important objective of identifying the most promising candidates to progress into development and onto registration.

[1]  Michael Markert,et al.  Developing a strategy for the nonclinical assessment of proarrhythmic risk of pharmaceuticals due to prolonged ventricular repolarization. , 2004, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[2]  Francesco Prati,et al.  From bench to bedside: a novel technique of acquiring OCT images. , 2008, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[3]  D. Roden,et al.  Cellular basis of drug‐induced torsades de pointes , 2008, British journal of pharmacology.

[4]  D. Murphy,et al.  Comprehensive non-clinical respiratory evaluation of promising new drugs. , 2005, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[5]  M K Pugsley,et al.  Principles of Safety Pharmacology , 2008, Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology.

[6]  A. P. Harrison,et al.  Gastrointestinal-tract models and techniques for use in safety pharmacology. , 2004, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[7]  R. Boyd,et al.  Nontraditional approaches to first‐in‐human studies to increase efficiency of drug development: will microdose studies make a significant impact? , 2007, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[8]  Andreas Ebneth,et al.  HTS techniques to investigate the potential effects of compounds on cardiac ion channels at early-stages of drug discovery. , 2003, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[9]  Martin Wehling,et al.  Translational medicine: can it really facilitate the transition of research “from bench to bedside”? , 2006, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[10]  Craig Montell,et al.  International Union of Pharmacology. XLIII. Compendium of Voltage-Gated Ion Channels: Transient Receptor Potential Channels , 2003, Pharmacological Reviews.

[11]  Ronald D Snyder,et al.  Computational prediction of genotoxicity: room for improvement. , 2005, Drug discovery today.

[12]  Walter A. Korfmacher,et al.  Rapid in vivo oral screening in rats: Reliability, acceptance criteria, and filtering efficiency , 2006, The AAPS Journal.

[13]  Maria L Webb,et al.  Kinase inhibitors as drugs for chronic inflammatory and immunological diseases: progress and challenges , 2008 .

[14]  Susan G. Emeigh Hart,et al.  Assessment of renal injury in vivo. , 2005 .

[15]  Donald P. McDonnell,et al.  International Union of Pharmacology. LXV. The Pharmacology and Classification of the Nuclear Receptor Superfamily: Glucocorticoid, Mineralocorticoid, Progesterone, and Androgen Receptors , 2006, Pharmacological Reviews.

[16]  C. January,et al.  International Life Sciences Institute (Health and Environmental Sciences Institute, HESI) initiative on moving towards better predictors of drug‐induced torsades de pointes , 2008, British journal of pharmacology.

[17]  Alan S Bass,et al.  Benchmarking safety pharmacology regulatory packages and best practice. , 2008, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[18]  Dennis Murphy,et al.  Current Practices in Safety Pharmacology , 2010 .

[19]  S. Venkatesh,et al.  Role of the development scientist in compound lead selection and optimization. , 2000, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[20]  M. Fielden,et al.  The role of early in vivo toxicity testing in drug discovery toxicology , 2008 .

[21]  Gary A Gintant,et al.  Preclinical Torsades-de-Pointes screens: advantages and limitations of surrogate and direct approaches in evaluating proarrhythmic risk. , 2008, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[22]  S. Irwin,et al.  Comprehensive observational assessment: Ia. A systematic, quantitative procedure for assessing the behavioral and physiologic state of the mouse , 1968, Psychopharmacologia.

[23]  R. Snyder,et al.  Toxicogenomics in drug discovery and development: mechanistic analysis of compound/class-dependent effects using the DrugMatrix database. , 2006, Pharmacogenomics.

[24]  G. Gintant,et al.  Tissue and species distribution of mRNA for the IKr-like K+ channel, erg. , 1997, Circulation research.

[25]  John Sharkey,et al.  Acquired QT interval prolongation and HERG: implications for drug discovery and development. , 2004, European journal of pharmacology.

[26]  P. Sager,et al.  Moving towards better predictors of drug‐induced torsades de pointes , 2008, British journal of pharmacology.

[27]  J. Kramer,et al.  The application of discovery toxicology and pathology towards the design of safer pharmaceutical lead candidates , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[28]  Shayne C. Gad,et al.  Preclinical Development Handbook , 2008 .

[29]  Esther F. Schmid,et al.  Do Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetic Departments Make Any Contribution to Drug Discovery? , 2002, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[30]  Robert L Hamlin,et al.  Animal models of ventricular arrhythmias. , 2007, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[31]  D. Rosskopf,et al.  Pharmacogenomics of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Ligands in Cardiovascular Medicine , 2008, Pharmacological Reviews.

[32]  Gavin Harper,et al.  Assessment of chemical coverage of kinome space and its implications for kinase drug discovery. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[33]  Darrell R. Abernethy,et al.  International Union of Pharmacology: Approaches to the Nomenclature of Voltage-Gated Ion Channels , 2003, Pharmacological Reviews.

[34]  Icilio Cavero,et al.  Moving towards better predictors of drug-induced Torsade de Pointes , 2006, Expert opinion on drug safety.

[35]  Patricia Williams,et al.  Origins, practices and future of safety pharmacology. , 2004, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[36]  Ismail Kola,et al.  Innovation and greater probability of success in drug discovery and development -- from target to biomarkers. , 2005, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[37]  Rob Wallis,et al.  Corrigendum to “Relationships between preclinical cardiac electrophysiology, clinical QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes for a broad range of drugs: evidence for a provisional safety margin in drug development” [Cardiovasc. Res. 58 (2003) 32–45] , 2004 .

[38]  J. Valentin,et al.  Strategies to reduce the risk of drug‐induced QT interval prolongation: a pharmaceutical company perspective , 2008, British journal of pharmacology.

[39]  R C MacPhail,et al.  Comparison of chlordimeform and carbaryl using a functional observational battery. , 1988, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[40]  Yuichi Sugiyama,et al.  Impact of Drug Transporter Studies on Drug Discovery and Development , 2003, Pharmacological Reviews.

[41]  Richard R. Neubig,et al.  International Union of Pharmacology. XLVI. G Protein-Coupled Receptor List , 2005, Pharmacological Reviews.

[42]  R. Snyder,et al.  Comparison of the results of a modified miniscreen and the standard bacterial reverse mutation assays , 2000, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[43]  B. Car,et al.  Commentary: Discovery Toxicology—A Nascent Science , 1999, Toxicologic pathology.

[44]  A. Palmer,et al.  New horizons in drug metabolism, pharmacokinetics and drug discovery. , 2003, Drug news & perspectives.

[45]  Roger D. Porsolt,et al.  Central Nervous System (CNS) Safety Pharmacology Studies , 2006 .

[46]  Martin Biel,et al.  International Union of Pharmacology. XLII. Compendium of Voltage-Gated Ion Channels: Cyclic Nucleotide-Modulated Channels , 2003, Pharmacological Reviews.

[47]  A. Camm,et al.  Relationships between preclinical cardiac electrophysiology, clinical QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes for a broad range of drugs: evidence for a provisional safety margin in drug development. , 2003, Cardiovascular research.

[48]  A. Sullivan,et al.  Evaluation of blood flow parameters in addition to blood pressure and electrocardiogram in the conscious telemetered beagle dog. , 2007, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[49]  L Martin Cloutier,et al.  Needed: system dynamics for the drug discovery process. , 2008, Drug discovery today.

[50]  J. Valentin,et al.  A Rabbit Langendorff Heart Proarrhythmia Model: Predictive Value for Clinical Identification of Torsades de Pointes , 2006, British journal of pharmacology.

[51]  M. Chen,et al.  Mechanisms of Cardiac Dysfunction Associated With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Cancer Therapeutics , 2008, Circulation.

[52]  I. Kola,et al.  The State of Innovation in Drug Development , 2008, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[53]  D. K. Walker,et al.  The use of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data in the assessment of drug safety in early drug development. , 2004, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[54]  R. R. Albee,et al.  A Performance Standard for Clinical and Functional Observational Battery Examinations of Rats , 1996 .

[55]  I. Kola,et al.  Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[56]  R. Shah,et al.  Cardiac Repolarisation and Drug Regulation , 2007, Drug safety.