Effects of Working Memory Load and Repeated Scenario Exposure on Emergency Braking Performance

Objective: The objective of the present study was to examine the effect of working memory load on drivers’ responses to a suddenly braking lead vehicle and whether this effect (if any) is moderated by repeated scenario exposure. Background: Several experimental studies have found delayed braking responses to lead vehicle braking events during concurrent performance of nonvisual, working memory—loading tasks, such as hands-free phone conversation. However, the common use of repeated, and hence somewhat expected, braking events may undermine the generalizability of these results to naturalistic, unexpected, emergency braking scenarios. Method: A critical lead vehicle braking scenario was implemented in a fixed-based simulator. The effects of working memory load and repeated scenario exposure on braking performance were examined. Results: Brake response time was decomposed into accelerator pedal release time and accelerator-to-brake pedal movement time. Accelerator pedal release times were strongly reduced with repeated scenario exposure and were delayed by working memory load with a small but significant amount (178 ms). The two factors did not interact. There were no effects on accelerator-to-brake pedal movement time. Conclusion:The results suggest that effects of working memory load on response performance obtained from repeated critical lead vehicle braking scenarios may be validly generalized to real world unexpected events. Application: The results have important implications for the interpretation of braking performance in experimental settings, in particular in the context of safety-related evaluation of in-vehicle information and communication technologies.

[1]  J Engstroem.  Scenario criticality determines the effect of working memory load on brake response time , 2010 .

[2]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Frank Drews,et al.  Profiles in Driver Distraction: Effects of Cell Phone Conversations on Younger and Older Drivers , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Marc Green,et al.  "How Long Does It Take to Stop?" Methodological Analysis of Driver Perception-Brake Times , 2000 .

[5]  K A Brookhuis,et al.  The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior Technical Report No. 8006. , 1980 .

[7]  M. Chun,et al.  Top-Down Attentional Guidance Based on Implicit Learning of Visual Covariation , 1999 .

[8]  H Alm,et al.  The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation. , 1995, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  James A. Caviness,et al.  Persistent Fear Responses in Rhesus Monkeys to the Optical Stimulus of "Looming" , 1962, Science.

[10]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  Effects of Memory Rehearsal on Driver Performance: Experiment and Theoretical Account , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[11]  Steven W. Keele,et al.  Compatibility and Time-Sharing in Serial Reaction Time. , 1967 .

[12]  Natasha Merat,et al.  The Effect of Stimulus Modality on Signal Detection: Implications for Assessing the Safety of In-Vehicle Technology , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Phase II – Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment , 2006 .

[14]  Timothy L. Brown,et al.  Speech-Based Interaction with In-Vehicle Computers: The Effect of Speech-Based E-Mail on Drivers' Attention to the Roadway , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[15]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[16]  J. Jonides.  Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[17]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Driving without a Clue , 2007 .

[18]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  Anand Tharanathan,et al.  Responses to deceleration during car following: roles of optic flow, warnings, expectations, and interruptions. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[20]  J. Krems,et al.  The effect of cognitive tasks on predicting eventis in traffic , 2008 .

[21]  Daniel V. McGehee,et al.  Collision Warning Timing, Driver Distraction, and Driver Response to Imminent Rear-End Collisions in a High-Fidelity Driving Simulator , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[22]  Johan Engström,et al.  Attention selection and task interference indriving: an action-oriented view , 2009 .