The Impact of Voxel Size-Based Inaccuracies on the Mechanical Behavior of Thin Bone Structures

Computed tomography (CT)-based measures of skeletal geometry and material properties have been widely used to develop finite element (FE) models of bony structures. However, in the case of thin bone structures, the ability to develop FE models with accurate geometry derived from clinical CT data presents a challenge due to the thinness of the bone and the limited resolution of the imaging devices. The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of voxel size on the thickness and intensity values of thin bone structure measurements and to assess the effect of voxel size on strains through FE modeling. Cortical bone thickness and material properties in five thin bone specimens were quantified at voxel sizes ranging from 16.4 to 488 μm. The measurements derived from large voxel size scans showed large increases in cortical thickness (61.9–252.2%) and large decreases in scan intensity (12.9–49.5%). Maximum principal strains from FE models generated using scans at 488 μm were decreased as compared to strains generated at 16.4 μm voxel size (8.6–64.2%). A higher level of significance was found in comparing intensity (p = 0.0001) vs. thickness (p = 0.005) to strain measurements. These findings have implications in developing methods to generate accurate FE models to predict the biomechanical behavior of thin bone structures.

[1]  G. Hounsfield Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part I. Description of system. 1973. , 1973, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  V Gilsanz,et al.  Age-related changes in cortical and cancellous vertebral bone density in girls: assessment with quantitative CT. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  J. Weiss,et al.  Subject-specific finite element model of the pelvis: development, validation and sensitivity studies. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  W. Kalender,et al.  Accuracy limits for the determination of cortical width and density: the influence of object size and CT imaging parameters. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Effects of thresholding techniques on microCT-based finite element models of trabecular bone. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  M Viceconti,et al.  Material properties assignment to finite element models of bone structures: a new method. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  Andrew H. Gee,et al.  High resolution cortical bone thickness measurement from clinical CT data , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  M. Viceconti,et al.  A modified method for assigning material properties to FE models of bones. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[9]  T. Hangartner,et al.  Evaluation of cortical bone by computed tomography , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  R Huiskes,et al.  From structure to process, from organ to cell: recent developments of FE-analysis in orthopaedic biomechanics. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  T D Szwedowski,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of a Validated Subject-Specific Finite Element Model of the Human Craniofacial Skeleton , 2011, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[12]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  An improved method for the automatic mapping of computed tomography numbers onto finite element models. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  T R Overton,et al.  Quantitative Measurement of Bone Density Using Gamma‐Ray Computed Tomography , 1982, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  O. Houser,et al.  Radiology of the Skull and Brain , 1976 .

[15]  T. H. Newton,et al.  Anatomy and pathology , 1977 .

[16]  M J Pearcy,et al.  A new approach for assigning bone material properties from CT images into finite element models. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  W. Hayes,et al.  Direct and computed tomography thickness measurements of the human, lumbar vertebral shell and endplate. , 1994, Bone.

[18]  T N Hangartner,et al.  Thresholding technique for accurate analysis of density and geometry in QCT, pQCT and microCT images. , 2007, Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions.

[19]  G. Dougherty,et al.  Limitations of clinical CT in assessing cortical thickness and density. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.