Utilization of Interspinous Devices Throughout the United States Over a Recent Decade: An Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample

Study Design: Retrospective database study. Objectives: Analysis of economic and demographic data concerning interspinous device (ID) placement throughout the United States to improve value-based care and health care utilization. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried for patients who underwent insertion of an interspinous process spinal stabilization device (ICD-9-CM 84.80) between 2008 and 2014 across 44 states. Demographic and economic data were obtained which included the annual number of surgeries, age, sex, insurance type, location, and frequency of routine discharge. The NIS database represents a 20% sample of discharges from US hospitals, which is weighted to provide national estimates. Results: There was a 73% decrease in ID implanted from 2008 to 2014. The mean cost associated with insertion of the device increased 28% from $13 653 in 2008 to $17 515 in 2014. The mean length of stay (LOS) increased from 1.8 to 2.4 days. Patients aged 45 to 64 years increased from 14.1% to 34.3% while patients aged 65 to 84 years decreased from 74.4% to 60.6%. By region, 34% of ID placement occurred in the South followed by 19.7% that occured in the Northeast. When stratifying by median income for patient zip code, the procedure was performed more in cities designated as higher rather than lower income areas (74.2% and 19.5%, respectively). Conclusions: Throughout the United States, there was a progressive decline in the insertion of interspinous spacers by 73% over the study period. The total costs for the procedure increased by 28% while the aggregate national charges decreased by 55.6% between 2008 and 2014.

[1]  A. Mesfin,et al.  Impact of the Economic Downturn on Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery in the United States: A National Trend Analysis, 2003 to 2013 , 2017, Global spine journal.

[2]  P. Vahedi,et al.  Interspinous implants: are the new implants better than the last generation? A review , 2017, Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine.

[3]  R. Crawford,et al.  Change of sagittal spinal alignment and its association with pain and function after lumbar surgery augmented with an interspinous implant , 2017, Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders.

[4]  Y. Hai,et al.  [Radiographic study of Coflex interspinous device for lumbar spinal stenosis]. , 2016, Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery].

[5]  R. Mobbs,et al.  Interspinous process spacers versus traditional decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2016, Journal of spine surgery.

[6]  A. Alfieri,et al.  Failure rates and complications of interspinous process decompression devices: a European multicenter study. , 2015, Neurosurgical focus.

[7]  M. Boakye,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Inpatient and Outpatient Interspinous Process Device Placement for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 2015, Journal of Neurological Surgery—Part A.

[8]  S. Lydersen,et al.  Comparing Cost-effectiveness of X-Stop With Minimally Invasive Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2015, Spine.

[9]  B. Koes,et al.  Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomised controlled trial , 2014, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[10]  M. Arts,et al.  Interspinous process devices versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: cost-utility analysis. , 2014, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[11]  M. Boakye,et al.  Interspinous device versus laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative effectiveness study. , 2014, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[12]  Xiang-Yang Wang,et al.  Interspinous Spacer versus Traditional Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2014, PLoS ONE.

[13]  A. Alfieri,et al.  Controversies about Interspinous Process Devices in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases: Past, Present, and Future , 2014, BioMed research international.

[14]  D. Brodke,et al.  Reoperation and Revision Rates of 3 Surgical Treatment Methods for Lumbar Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Scoliosis and Spondylolisthesis , 2013, Spine.

[15]  N. Epstein A review of interspinous fusion devices: High complication, reoperation rates, and costs with poor outcomes , 2012, Surgical neurology international.

[16]  R. Delamarter,et al.  Spinal Fusion in the United States: Analysis of Trends From 1998 to 2008 , 2012, Spine.

[17]  R. Deyo,et al.  Point of View: In Response to Spinal Fusion in the United States Analysis of Trends From 1998 to 2008 , 2012 .

[18]  G. Skidmore,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of the X-STOP® Interspinous Spacer for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 2011, Spine.

[19]  D. Norvell,et al.  Efficacy of interspinous device versus surgical decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a modified network analysis , 2011, Evidence-based spine-care journal.

[20]  M. Burnett,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of current treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: nonsurgical care, laminectomy, and X-STOP. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[21]  H. Halm,et al.  Does an interspinous device (Coflex™) improve the outcome of decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis? One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients , 2010, European Spine Journal.

[22]  J. Kuchta,et al.  Interspinous implants (X Stop®, Wallis®, Diam®) for the treatment of LSS: is there a correlation between radiological parameters and clinical outcome? , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[23]  H. Wilke,et al.  Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[24]  G. Skidmore,et al.  P27. Cost-effectiveness of Interspinous Process Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comparison with Conservative Care and Laminectomy , 2007 .

[25]  J. Zucherman,et al.  Quality of life of lumbar stenosis-treated patients in whom the X STOP interspinous device was implanted. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[26]  A. Sanabria,et al.  Randomized controlled trial. , 2005, World journal of surgery.

[27]  J. Zucherman,et al.  A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Trial Evaluating the X STOP Interspinous Process Decompression System for the Treatment of Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication: Two-Year Follow-Up Results , 2005, Spine.

[28]  S. Majumdar,et al.  The Treatment Mechanism of an Interspinous Process Implant for Lumbar Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication , 2005, Spine.

[29]  Y. Iwasaki,et al.  An Interspinous Process Distractor (X STOP) for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Elderly Patients: Preliminary Experiences in 10 Consecutive Cases , 2004, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[30]  S. Yerby,et al.  The Effects of an Interspinous Implant on Intervertebral Disc Pressures , 2003, Spine.

[31]  M. Raimondi,et al.  Elastic stabilization alone or combined with rigid fusion in spinal surgery: a biomechanical study and clinical experience based on 82 cases , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[32]  J. Sénégas,et al.  Mechanical supplementation by non-rigid fixation in degenerative intervertebral lumbar segments: the Wallis system , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[33]  Minns Rj,et al.  Preliminary design and experimental studies of a novel soft implant for correcting sagittal plane instability in the lumbar spine. , 1997 .

[34]  V. Haughton,et al.  Anatomic Changes of the Spinal Canal and Intervertebral Foramen Associated With Flexion‐Extension Movement , 1996, Spine.

[35]  H. Matsui,et al.  Ceramic interspinous block (CISB) assisted anterior interbody fusion. , 1990, Journal of spinal disorders.

[36]  T. Albert,et al.  Interspinous process spacers. , 2007, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[37]  M. Moon Preliminary design and experimental studies of a novel soft implant for correcting sagittal plane instability in the lumbar spine. , 1999, Spine.