Perception of electric properties of objects in electrolocating weakly electric fish: two-dimensional similarity scaling reveals a City-Block metric

During electrolocation weakly electric fish monitor their self-emitted electric signals in order to detect and evaluate nearby objects. Individuals of the mormyrid species Gnathonemus petersii were trained to discriminate between resistive and capacitive objects that differed only in their electric properties. Capacitive properties are found almost exclusively among living objects, and are thus of special importance to the fish. Resistive and capacitive properties of objects influence the amplitude and waveform of the perceived electrolocation signals in different ways. Resistive objects change only signal amplitude, whereas capacitive objects affect both amplitude and waveform. The electro-perceptual system of weakly electric fish was investigated by systematic variation of amplitude and waveform using objects of various electric properties as electrolocation targets. After training with a particular stimulus set, the fish reacted in a graded manner to differences in both signal parameters. The perception of each stimulus dimension was found to be independent of the other one. In a kind of ‘cross modality matching’ experiment, amplitude and waveform parameters were tested against one another. For each amplitude value there was a corresponding waveform value that was judged by the fish to be equally different from the training stimuli. Because of these results, a two-dimensional “perceptual space” is postulated with the two stimulus dimensions waveform and amplitude as its axes. A scaling procedure, using Minkowski metrics, was applied to determine the fish's “perceptual metric”. The City-Block metric, and not the Euclidean metric, provided the best description of the data. The two signal dimensions were found to be separable, i.e. to combine additively in complex stimuli. The results are discussed with regard to the discrimination of animate and inanimate objects in the natural environment of the fish.

[1]  C. Bell,et al.  Mormyromast electroreceptor organs and their afferent fibers in mormyrid fish. III. Physiological differences between two morphological types of fibers. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  W. R. Garner The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[3]  B. Ronacher Unabhängigkeit der bewertung zweier musterparameter von deren unterschiedlichkeitsgrad bei der Dressur , 1983, Biological Cybernetics.

[4]  B. Ronacher,et al.  Human pattern recognition: Individually different strategies in analyzing complex stimuli , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[5]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  Principles of Electrolocation and Jamming Avoidance in Electric Fish , 1977, Studies of Brain Function.

[6]  B. Ronacher Beitrag einzelner parameter zum wahrnehumungsgemäßen unterschied von zusammengesetzten reizen bei der honigbiene , 1979, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  R. Shepard Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. , 1964 .

[8]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Properties, Parts, and Objects , 1986 .

[9]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  Discrimination of objects through electrolocation in the weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  K. E. Machin,et al.  The Mechanism of Object Location in Gymnarchus Niloticus and Similar Fish , 1958 .

[11]  J. Dunn,et al.  Spatial metrics of integral and separable dimensions. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Willa Kay Wiener-Ehrlich,et al.  The Relation Between Stimulus Analyzability and Perceived Dimensional Structure1 , 1978 .

[13]  R N Shepard,et al.  Multidimensional Scaling, Tree-Fitting, and Clustering , 1980, Science.

[14]  Gerhard von der Emde,et al.  Differential responses of two types of electroreceptive afferents to signal distortions may permit capacitance measurement in a weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii , 1992, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[15]  R. Menzel,et al.  Multidimensional scaling of color similarity in bees , 1987, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  S. S. Stevens Cross-modality validation of subjective scales for loudness, vibration, and electric shock. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  David H. Krantz,et al.  The dimensional representation and the metric structure of similarity data , 1970 .

[18]  G. von der Emde,et al.  THE SENSING OF ELECTRICAL CAPACITANCES BY WEAKLY ELECTRIC MORMYRID FISH: EFFECTS OF WATER CONDUCTIVITY , 1993 .

[19]  Bernhard Ronacher,et al.  Pattern recognition in honeybees: Multidimensional scaling reveals a city-block metric , 1992, Vision Research.

[20]  W. R. Garner The effect of absolute size on the separability of the dimensions of size and brightness , 1977 .

[21]  G. von der Emde,et al.  Responses of cells in the mormyrid electrosensory lobe to EODs with distorted waveforms: implications for capacitance detection , 1994, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[22]  G. von der Emde,et al.  Capacitance discrimination in electrolocating, weakly electric pulse fish , 1993, Naturwissenschaften.

[23]  M. Toerring,et al.  Motor programmes and electroreception in mormyrid fish , 1979, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[24]  S. Imai,et al.  The free classification of analyzable and unanalyzable stimuli , 1972 .

[25]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Theory and Methods of Scaling. , 1958 .

[26]  R. E. Landsman The effects of captivity on the electric organ discharge and plasma hormone levels in Gnathonemus petersii (Mormyriformes) , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[27]  B. Ronacher,et al.  Äquivalenz zwischen größen- und helligkeitsunterschieden im rahmen der visuellen wahrnehmung der honigbiene , 1979, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  Louis W. Gellermann Chance Orders of Alternating Stimuli in Visual Discrimination Experiments , 1933 .

[29]  S. S. Stevens On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[30]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[31]  A. Tversky,et al.  Foundations of multidimensional scaling. , 1968, Psychological review.